The first player on frog finder has a massive disadvantage if he hits a frog, there is a 10 points difference in the score which is impossible to make up... maybe the first person to go should have a free shot, if he hits a frog the board is reset ........ just a thought
WellyWales: I have thought about that also. But also on the flip side, the first player has the advantage of the first turn - that is player 1 could win the game in 5 turns (with 5 perfect guesses), and the 2nd player would not get a last "equal" amount of turns to tie.
So to give player 1 a "free shot" - and even a chance to find an opponents frog for free would give player 1 a VERY BIG advantage.
Looking at the game stats, the game seems VERY even right now.
red 2626 (49.82 %) blue 2633 (49.96 %) Draws 11 (0.20 %)
I did not go through all the games, but after 5,000+ games - that is as close as even that almost any game could get!
WellyWales: As said, that might give the player going first a bit of an advantage.
Perhaps it's better to have a rule that the second player cannot play his first move adjacent to the first move of the first player.
However, I don't think the second player has that much of a disadvantage - certainly less than white has in chess. Yes, the first player has the disadvantage of having to make a blind shot - but there are only five enemy frogs. He's more likely to make a shot right next to an enemy frog, revealing a non-zero number, leaving the second player to make a blind shot.
(скрий) Ако искате да поздравите някого на родния му език, пробвайте нашия Речник на играча, който се намира при препратката "още за езиците", точно под знамената. (pauloaguia) (покажи всички подсказки)