hello all programming- and web-design-experts here -
i just uploaded a site called

centro verde

and i put in two scripts for a navigation-bar and for changing images. tested it in different browsers and there are occuring some mysterious mistakes... . those simple scripts should work cross-platform, but in some browsers i cant use my navigation-bar and in some the image-change-funktion seems to have problems. (one of the pages with image-change-function is this one
anyone has got an idea? sunny thanks for looking - diogenes

BerniceC: yeah! the VLC is a good thing -

burning probs? hmmm, try another software, to be downloaded for free here:

http://www.chip.de/downloads/c1_downloads_13008349.html

BerniceC:

download this small and powerful player "VLC media player"

here:

http://www.videolan.org/

this one should work even with incomplete files and you shouldnt have to download all thos codec-packs, that may cause trouble on your cpu...

Rose: sure. the quality of a graphic may vary. within word, there is no chance to change and/or increase the quality, because word is not the program one should use to embed graphics. unfortunately, naby people just know word and nothing else. if possible, the graphic should be sent as a graphic and not embedded into word. the average graphic with a good quality on a screen is a 72dpi-jpeg file. to be printed it should be minimum 150dpi. there are many easy-to-handle freeware-progs that help people to view and resize graphics. i recommend e.g. "irfan view"

Gr☺uch☺: how about leftklicking it. then copying it and opening and saving it with a graphic-program?

oh really?didnt know that firefox just supports OperatingSystems that will occur after 2010 or before 98...;-) - this cannot be... maybe there are some hidden windows you cant see????

that sounds good... ;-)

WatfordFC: check out the firefox-adjusts: "extras -> adjusts (or "preferences" or "options"- i dont know cause i use the german version) -> content - there is a checkbox "load graphics". is it checked?

and plaintiger: for it-(semi-professionals and up its not that important to get virii or not. today, you have four hard-disks with four windows-versions, so the average loss of two whole windowsOS per week on windows isnt that enerving and not very expensive...

temo and plaintiger: as one of the few who use both systems for many years now my experience tells me there are real benefits from both systems: the huge amount of software and general compatibilities, and of course less cost for the whole hardware count for microsoft. but i would never use something else than a macintosh if i was a professional dj or photographer and needed for example a 9-hour-stability of my eqipment ;-) using a mac is not only the question of prestige and as a mac user i do not need many many software-applications windows-fans would probably like...

the windows updates... . 

Rose: is it moreorless safe to do those updates anyway?