Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.
If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).
Fencer: Perhaps the Knights could be allowed to enter up to 10 tournaments of any type or just remove the tournament game type restriction completely instead of limiting them to 1 of each type. Seeing how they are limited to 50 going games total, that should be plenty of tournament admissions. I also fail to see why a Knight is limited by what type of game the tournament is. The total number of games going should be the limiting factor. If someone only wants to play Backgammon, why not let them?
Another thing that can be done, would be to lower the fee for a Knight membership while leaving the restrictions in place and the create a new membership category priced at or near the current Knight membership that would have the restrictions removed and increase the number of going games to 80 or 100. It could be called a Bishop membership and would fit right into the scheme of things. This would give people an extra choice to choose the membership that best suits their needs.
playBunny: I believe that a member is allowed to pay the difference of the price of a Knight member to a Rook membership prorated for the remainder of the Knight membership and get the upgrade in membership. The difference between the two is about 10 euros for a whole year, isn't it? Maybe you can check into that. It doesn't seem like it would cost you much more and your friend's gift would still bare most of the cost.
Purple: But u shouldnt have to do that, i should have got the brains, end of story. But thanks anyway , you r one of a few nice people on here that support one other
playBunny: Scarlet Rose, mabe you she read all the entires properly so u will understand what is going on here before u accuse people of "skimping" I was not skimping at all, so get your facts right please.
got a question: i've just clicked the "remove" link at the bottom of Fencer's latest news post to make it go away, but having never used that link before, i don't know: will the next news Fencer posts appear when he posts it? or have i just turned his news off until i turn it back on again somewhere?
Princess Alison: I am so sorry to have upset you.. and yes.. I didn't think of how the outcome would be. For I really didn't have the intentions of it being taken personally as you had.. please pardon.. and I will remove that post promptly..
It is kind of amazing that this referral program has generated such heated debate!? It's an imperfect system, that doesn't seem to be in doubt. But in the blink of an eye, Filip could just as easily scrap the whole thing, and we'd all have "no brains"! Not that he'd want to necessarily, he has his own reasons for it being there, but he could do away with it.
For example, over two years ago, when I was a pawn, I referred a player who immediately became a Rook, and that player referred several other players of a specific game type who also became Rooks, but I got nothing. I later became a Knight, then a Rook, then back to a Pawn, then a Knight, but there was no retroactive payment for my referral; just the way it goes.
There seems to be about five times as many Rooks as Knights, so it is obviously the optimum choice for those who do pay (or get a membership via grant). However, this is common knowledge, so retroactive rewards do not seem in order, but that is Filip's domain, so I'll say nothing more.... I'd become a Rook again, except that with over 50 games going, I cannot devote enough attention to each and play as sharply as I'd like, although this may not be of concern to many other players that just to have a lot of games going. The main drawback of the Knight membership is having to wait for other players to finish their games before another tournament of that type can be entered, but by trying new games I have adjusted to that somewhat; also, I look for events with shorter time limits.
After experiencing many different internet games sites over the past several years, I believe beyond question that this site is by far the best, all things considered.
um...new question: why are there Google ads for other gaming sites ("Play Backgammon with Us!") out on the login page? isn't that a bit self-defeating? wouldn't Filip rather people came and played backgammon *here*?
plaintiger: Google Ads works by reading the page that will contain the ads and deciding which are the key words. It then hauls out one of a selection of ads based on those words. I don't believe participants in the scheme have much control over what Google chooses though it would make sense, as you point out, not to have competitors advertised.
plaintiger: So what? I have nothing against people trying other game sites as well. It doesn't matter if they find an URL here or elsewhere. But if they click on the ad here, I can get some extra income from Google.
Is it possible we could get a feature that would let each players color be chosen randomly once the game starts? I really hate having to choose wether im white or black, I'd like it to randomly pick for me at game start.
I was just looking, and notice that Fencer made a new board: Missing people - This is a temporary board to post information about the members who are missing since the hurricane Katrina which hit hard several states in the USA
I usually try not to post information on multiple boards, but I thought many people would be interested in this board.
BIG BAD WOLF:
Please list any members that you know of that are missing on that board, maybe someone else has heard from them or has a way of contacting family that would know!
I would just like to say, and i am sure my thoughts are echoed, here, in the UK, our thoughts are with all American people during this very difficult and traumatic time.