Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.
If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).
another fake newspaper site:
note links to other various joke fake documents
----
PS this isnt fake,I'm not joking about this,just saw a show on tv(TVO) that said years ago,in some part of italy?( I think)..it was illegal to lick an ice cream cone.
because it was thought this was an an ladylike behavior & might indicate unsavory habits..is this true?really?I am searching on the internet,just curious,can find anything yet.
rtv, put simply, your rating depends on your opponents rating too. If you win 10 games with players who have ratings of 1000 or less, your rating will likely be lower than if you'd won games against players with 1800+ ratings.
Its quite a bit more complicated, but thats a very basic idea of it.
I am new to this site and wondering can someone tell me how the ratings are arrived at? I'm primarily interested in how for the extinction chess. I see players with better won/loss ratios that have lower ratings than
someone with a worse won/loss ratio.
Is there anywhere on this site that explains how the ratings are arrived at etc?
Thanks
The wins/losses ratio is useful in conjunction with the rating but is not directly comparable. It depends on the ratings of your opponents, so, for example, a high win count against weak players will not achieve a high rating.
And here are two in depth articles on the formula. It's a chess formula but is used for all games. [so far, hint hint, Filip, lol]
USCF Rating System and Chess ratings.
They're a bit mathematical but have a read of them and see how much sense they make.
I am new to this site and wondering can someone tell me how the ratings are arrived at? I'm primarily interested in how for the extinction chess. I see players with better won/loss ratios that have lower ratings than
someone with a worse won/loss ratio.
Is there anywhere on this site that explains how the ratings are arrived at etc?
Thanks
Fencer: Yes, I'd like that too. That's make four options, right? Active Provisional, Active Established, Inactive Provisional, and Inactive Established?
Not sure if it's a bug or if it is suppose to be this way.
In the games which I have not completed a game for awhile (lets take Maharajah Chess for example), even though I do have a rating, it shows me as "unrated" while playing a game.
I would still think it should show my rating during a game, but just keep me off the "high ratings" list.
I, for one, am happy to see that "Nellaf" is finally gone from the Gothic Chess rating list So thanks for that.
There seems to have been a lot of "dead wood" on the lists, in some cases 40% - 50% of the players were pawns clinging to the posts. Has anyone else noticed that?
题目: Re: Shopping?? Why.. did someone say shopping??
harley: Grabs sweater and purse.. let's go.. HMmm.. LQQks around.. and snatches CC's from all the males on the boards.. Come on Harley.. whoo hoo.. lotsa moola here.. :)
Grim Reaper: You re-read the contract, Edward. It uses the words "description of the rules of the game". And I am the one to decide which pages fulfil these conditions.