用户名: 密码:
新用户注册
监管者: Hrqls , coan.net ,  rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


每页的消息:
讨论板列表
您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑马级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。
状态: 所有人能发表
帖子搜索:  

<< <   546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555   > >>
25. 七月 2004, 22:10:23
danoschek 
题目: Re:
people who are not within your specified range, won't see your invitation. ~*~

25. 七月 2004, 22:05:03
BuilderQ 
When I define a new game with a rating restriction, it still shows that my opponent will be "any player." Shouldn't it show that my opponent must have a rating within the parameters I selected? Looking at my invitations waiting for response, I would like to able to remind myself how I defined them. And maybe others seeing them would like to know what restrictions I made?

25. 七月 2004, 19:10:51
Stevie 
but looking to see if certain friend is on line now makes it awkward and easy to miss someone :o(

25. 七月 2004, 18:29:37
Eriisa 
well the one advantage of last action, is you can tell quickly who just showed up.

25. 七月 2004, 17:56:07
Stevie 
last action I think Eriisa :o) I prefered it alphabetical

25. 七月 2004, 17:55:08
Eriisa 
题目: Friends
I don't remember an answer to this before, so what the heck....

What order does the 'Friends Online' list?

25. 七月 2004, 16:51:26
leprechaun 
It works. Thanks, Fencer!

25. 七月 2004, 15:48:38
Fencer 
Of course. There was a bug in new user registration process. My fault.

25. 七月 2004, 15:45:18
Fencer 
Try it now.

25. 七月 2004, 15:11:55
leprechaun 
题目: OK...
I don't know then. What do you think could be the problem, Fencer?

25. 七月 2004, 15:09:19
Fencer 
All registered users can modify settings.

25. 七月 2004, 15:08:18
leprechaun 
题目: Hmmm...
Maybe that is it. Are there any pawns that can confirm it?

25. 七月 2004, 15:04:34
Dolittle 
Works for me but then I am using a pc! You can even put them in reverse alphabetical order..thanks for the tip rod!

25. 七月 2004, 15:03:49
Jason 
pawns might not be able to modify settings like paid members can , not sure on that though ;)

25. 七月 2004, 13:59:52
leprechaun 
题目: Re:
I don't know. I'm doing exactly as you said. I guess theres just something wrong with my system. Thanks for the advice anyway.

25. 七月 2004, 12:58:04
rod03801 
rod03801修改(25. 七月 2004, 12:59:38)
I am also on WebTV
Go to Who is Online.
at the top of the chart you will see "Level, Name, Last action, etc... One of those columns will have a little green arrow by it.. Click on "Name" and the page will reload with all the people who are currently online in alphabetical order, and the green arrow will be by the Name column. It works fine. You must have done something wrong.

25. 七月 2004, 12:51:20
leprechaun 
题目: Sorry
Sorry, rod. That didn't work( or maybe i did it wrong?). Is that the only way? I use web TV, does that make a difference?

25. 七月 2004, 12:43:36
leprechaun 
题目: Ohh
Thank you, rod.

25. 七月 2004, 12:31:48
rod03801 
Click the column where the names are, and it will be arranged alphabetically by the person's name.

25. 七月 2004, 11:45:47
leprechaun 
题目: Who is online
Umm, I'm looking for a way to sort my "Who is online" list. Right now, it is in no type of order and repeats player's names multiple times. How (or can) I fix this?

24. 七月 2004, 23:15:38
Antje 
ooops too late(about pming the now-pawn). i have another captain already!!!

24. 七月 2004, 23:11:59
rod03801 
Oh, I think I found the answer. Make someone else the captain. That works.

24. 七月 2004, 23:08:36
rod03801 
I PM'd mine that turned to pawns to see if they planned on renewing soon, first.. but you can always re-invite them if they upgrade again.

24. 七月 2004, 22:59:53
Antje 
im booting out all the pawns there now. they cant be in one anyway!

24. 七月 2004, 22:59:21
Antje 
yepp, no edit but next to the captain's name :)

24. 七月 2004, 22:54:40
rod03801 
Maybe in the team you have to edit them from captain to player before you can remove them as manager.. did you try it that way?

24. 七月 2004, 22:48:58
Antje 
i couldnt change it from manager to member Harley. i tried. and there's no edit button next to his name in the team list. i think i'll just have to remove him

24. 七月 2004, 22:43:19
danoschek 
题目: a similar problem
occured on the fellowships board - fencer solved it, 23. July 2004, 05:35:47 ~*~

24. 七月 2004, 22:43:05
harley 
My mistake! The 'edit' button is next to their name in the fellowship list. If you press that, it should give you the option to turn them into a 'member', and that should take away their captain status.

24. 七月 2004, 22:41:22
harley 
Antje, next to where it says 'captain', can't you use the edit button?

Otherwise its as Crissie says, you'd have to remove them from the fellowship. Maybe with a note to explain why?

24. 七月 2004, 22:28:53
Antje 
i thought of that Crissie, to remove him from the fellowship. i havent done that yet (to anyone) i suppose thats the only way?

24. 七月 2004, 22:25:09
Crissie 
i wonder if you just go to the remove player option, and remove them if it would delete them as captain as well... just a thought :)

24. 七月 2004, 22:23:04
Antje 
anyone able to help me on this? I have someone in my fellowship who has let their rook expire, (now a pawn). I need to remove that player from captain status on a team so i can add a new one. im not able to change his status from manager to member, and im not able to edit his captain status either. suggestions?

24. 七月 2004, 20:40:04
danoschek 
题目: thank you :)
danoschek修改(24. 七月 2004, 20:40:18)
I know it's an extra feature and no simple adjustment,
appreciating that you'll keep it in mind ... :") ... ~*~

24. 七月 2004, 20:38:48
Fencer 
There are more important things to do at the moment. When they are finished, I might look at it.

24. 七月 2004, 20:35:02
danoschek 
题目: So again
danoschek修改(24. 七月 2004, 20:39:11)
will you finally do something about that flaw in the tournament logic ?
I mean - uhhhm neat that you think the one who loses is qualified, many of
my opponents would support that *grin* but that does not fix the reality problem ... ~*~

24. 七月 2004, 19:11:58
The Listener 
Thanx Bernice -- I would, but I'm happy enough with the little things in life, I possess no need to belong to anything or climb to the top of a browny hill and scream at the farmland below ~ until next...

24. 七月 2004, 18:51:10
BuilderQ 

24. 七月 2004, 18:42:15
danoschek 
题目: builderq
that's the way it is ... as mentioned, inessential if a valid direct comparison exists. ~*~

24. 七月 2004, 18:37:29
BuilderQ 
Maybe there should be negative S-B, in which losses to weaker players matter more than to stronger ones?

24. 七月 2004, 18:18:13
danoschek 
题目: you made it for me
spammo attacks are just another problem every game server suffers ~*~

24. 七月 2004, 18:17:14
LongJohn 
I think Dano is trying to make a point about something LOL

24. 七月 2004, 18:15:38
danoschek 
题目: before spammo attacks bury the original here the text - thanks Jason, for an opinion after all - excited LJ playing in my group should not be considered to be having an own one, naturally
danoschek修改(24. 七月 2004, 18:15:59)
Another Flaw in the Tournaments
23. July 2004, 16:56:54

Simply said, an SB-Value is often pure humbug in small groups, Much better to
take the direct encounter as first choice - if just two are level, the one who won
the game between them, should rank higher (for that time) - beyond any doubt. ~*~

24. 七月 2004, 18:13:33
LongJohn 
I see you joined all 5 of my tourneys
No skin off my nose, there are no prizes in those.
FYI I had no idea those battleboats tourneys were yours or that you removed me. I couldnt care less for your tournaments. I only joined because it was about to start.
I will not boot you from mine though.

24. 七月 2004, 17:49:46
Jason 
longjohn , likes to creep in where not wanted . even tourneys hes been removed from

24. 七月 2004, 17:48:34
LongJohn 
others may have a differing opinion.
In this case, Fencer has a duifferent opinion.
Both are correct

24. 七月 2004, 17:47:26
LongJohn 
yes that is YOUR perspective

24. 七月 2004, 17:46:59
danoschek 
题目: It is clear and the only perspective.
danoschek修改(24. 七月 2004, 17:47:15)
direct comparison decides naturally, that's why it's handled that way worldwide but here. ~*~

24. 七月 2004, 17:44:15
LongJohn 
that is only one perspective.
Another argument could be made as to why the person that beat the other person lost to someone else that the other person beat.
It is not a clear cut solution, it depends on the perspective it is looked though

24. 七月 2004, 17:41:25
danoschek 
题目: of course it is, naturally
danoschek修改(24. 七月 2004, 17:43:37)
if just TWO are level, and one defeated the other,
he's beyond ANY doubt better that time, that group . ~*~

<< <   546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555   > >>
日期和时间
在线的朋友
最喜欢的讨论板
朋友群
每日提示
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有
回顶端