用户名: 密码:
新用户注册
监管者: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


每页的消息:
讨论板列表
您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑马级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。
状态: 所有人能发表
帖子搜索:  

<< <   636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645   > >>
9. 九月 2003, 15:01:40
Crissie 
题目: Re: game id #185618
Thanks Fencer! :o)

9. 九月 2003, 14:24:16
Stevie 
题目: Game moves.
Is it just me, or are we having to repeat some moves today ever so often, just the odd game though?

9. 九月 2003, 08:33:03
harley 
I've deleted too many messages this morning to message everyone individually. I realise some weren't offensive, but any and all posts concerning tonyhawk have been removed and I would appreciate it very much, if he posts again, that nobody reply. He has been warned and the next post he makes about unbeatable king will lead to him being banned also. Thanks :o)

9. 九月 2003, 07:33:19
Kevin 
Nope, it's based on when your opponent's last move was - so the game that has been your turn for the longest will show up next.

9. 九月 2003, 07:14:55
Lythande 
题目: Re: Question
Thanks for the reply, BBW. :) Is that regardless of 'time left for move' on the games?

9. 九月 2003, 04:11:16
coan.net 
The order is in the order that the other person played the game. So the "oldest" game in the list will be first to be played.

It is on the list to be able to sort the "next game" in other ways, but nothing will probable happen until there is a new server here.

9. 九月 2003, 04:08:49
Lythande 
题目: Question
What order do the games default to when you choose 'next game' from the drop-down? It would be nice if it when by the chosen order of your main page list. :)

If you could drop a note to my personal message box, I would appreciate it.

Thanks in advance,

Lyth

8. 九月 2003, 23:16:15
harley 
tony, I'm sorry but you have been ofered help and advice from lots of people on this subject. If you like, send me a private message and I will try to help further. But posting here will do no more good. I will have to start deleting any messages about this now.

8. 九月 2003, 22:51:05
tonyhawk2004 
题目: useless
look guys everything u said was fake this guy picks a user out of the hat and sends iyt ads/spam

8. 九月 2003, 12:32:40
danoschek 
题目: daemon :)
*melt* but psst - couldn't I rent that effect for personal use ? :D ~*~

8. 九月 2003, 12:27:20
Fencer 
题目: Re: ooogh - SUPERcrowded backgammon :O
Invisible BK daemon ;-)

8. 九月 2003, 12:25:29
danoschek 
题目: Re: ooogh - SUPERcrowded backgammon :O
ahhhhh - much better ...
whoever fixed it, Fencer/Liquid or Father Random, thanks ... :) ~*~

8. 九月 2003, 12:19:40
danoschek 
题目: ooogh - SUPERcrowded backgammon :O
g=192742

somebody please look at this game and tell me I don't hallucinate ...

try two moves back and forth on ... hyelp ! ~*~

8. 九月 2003, 11:45:01
Fencer 
题目: Re: game id #185618
Oops. I'll do it later today. Please give me several hours :-)

8. 九月 2003, 11:41:09
Crissie 
题目: game id #185618
Fencer could you please end this game! I've tried to. I've moved a piece out and then back in and yet it still continues to play though I've already won it twice. LOL Thanks!!!

Crissie :o)

8. 九月 2003, 09:18:44
Fencer 
题目: Re: tonyhawk2004
Thank you Harley.
I am trying to be as patient with any user as possible but sometimes it isn't possible at all.

8. 九月 2003, 08:45:39
harley 
题目: Re: tonyhawk2004
I sent tonyhawk a few private messages about this, advising him of his options.
Then, as Kev said, 'unbeatable king' began posting here. To cut a long story short he is now the first person to be banned from this board :o(

8. 九月 2003, 08:12:46
Fencer 
题目: Re: tonyhawk2004
I've already told this guy what to do [yesterday]. His response is still the same, about leaving BrainKing. Well, there is not much else to say to a person who sends complaints to all sides 16 hours after registering his BK account.

8. 九月 2003, 07:02:41
Kevin 
Well, i was online when tonyhawk's first post was made (the one about unbeatableking bothering him) and what happened was it was first posted with a different user name (i don't remember what). Then, i went on to another db, and saw another new post on this board. The first one was gone, and the exact same post was made with the userid unbeatableking (yes, himself complaining about himself bothering him! lol). Then again, another new post and it was again the exact same post, this time by tonyhawk2004 (the one currently there).

8. 九月 2003, 05:52:39
rabbitoid 
题目: tonyhawk2004
Profile: tonyhawk2004
First login: 7. September 2003, 04:21:54
Last action: 8. September 2003, 00:33:10 - logging out
Total score: 0 wins, 0 draws, 0 losses
no current games
how did you manage to find someone to bother you in such a short time? just curious.

8. 九月 2003, 03:56:31
coan.net 
tonyhawk2004: You could just change your name and then don't talk to the person who is bothering you. If the other person does not know your name here, then he could not contact you here.

Just a thought...

7. 九月 2003, 23:02:27
tonyhawk2004 
题目: Re:
look harely i can't put him in my enemies list then he'll find a way to keep bothering me just suspend him or warn him in a message okay!!!!

7. 九月 2003, 22:57:56
annabria 
题目: Re: Rules of Backgammon
With freedom comes responsibility, it is a fact no matter how many would try to dispute it. One has total freedom to step off the cliff, yet it is not always the most responsible thing to do, especially if there is a stair down. Truthfully, being rather new to backgammon, I was not aware of some of the rules, and the bugs that can be caused by software logic problems. If I have violated this rule (or any for that matter), please forgive my ignorance and point it out to me, I will happily reform my manner of play.

7. 九月 2003, 22:53:58
harley 
tonyhawk I can't suspend anyone from using the site. If he's bothering you put him on your 'enemies' list and he will not be able to message you or send you an invite to a game, or even see that you are online.

7. 九月 2003, 22:48:25
tonyhawk2004 
题目: i'm leaving brainking
as u know i reported on a guy callled unbeatableking and because of him i'll have to leave brainking if i stay he'll keep bothering me about IYT if u him tell him i'l leaving because of him if u want to help me get him suspended just go report him to harely and harely plz suspend that guy or lse ii'm leaving brainking!!!

6. 九月 2003, 22:07:44
danoschek 
题目: yes - hopefully the bg board
the brainking rules of backgammon are readable. and even if the
bk-logic would allow violating them, I'd surely not consider doing so.

but the questionable exception-rule is not written down, instead
only hoovering in somebody's assumption which seems odd here
where I live ... (to correct other assumptions met) - details about
(as repeatedly pointed) cAn be viewed at the backgammon board ... ~*~

6. 九月 2003, 21:50:55
harley 
Just what I was about to say rod! Thanks :o)
It is really a subject for the backgammon discussion board.

6. 九月 2003, 21:45:30
rod03801 
题目: Re: Rules of Backgammon
I agree completely, Pyloric Valve. As I'm sure MOST backgammon lovers do too.

I DO see Danoschek's point, that technically HERE, it is not cheating.
But it is NOT the universally accepted version of backgammon. PERIOD.
I'm sure that since a majority of backgammon players here would prefer the universally accepted rules to be implement here, I'm sure Fencer will at some point do this. He is a busy man!
I have often wondered if he would consider putting the game back a move if both parties agreed that would be the fair thing to do. (Maybe they weren't aware of the rule, and if you mention it to them, they agree to it).. Just a thought.

6. 九月 2003, 20:23:37
danoschek 
题目: will this never stop ?
here we have different rules, some even insist you cAn not put
more than 5 stones onto a single tacken and call that professional ...

it's a manner of agreement period.

for me people not respecting my free choice which die to use as first are
basically alogic - but I don't oppress and call them clueless or (ugh) amoralic ...

as for monopoly, to have adjustable rules should be possible, big deal ! ~*~

6. 九月 2003, 20:03:57
pyloric valve 
题目: Re: Rules of Backgammon
This discussion has veered into a very deep philosophical discussion on the nature of cheating the importance of rules. Let me be clear. Whether or not there is a glitch in the software, it is cheating by any definition to take advantage of a mistake. Period. There are no ways aroudn it unless you cheat and you require justification. There is now way in which you can call a game backgammon and not play both die every turn. That is the fundamental nature of backgammon. I defy anyone to find such a rule for backgammon anywhere that it is played seriously. As such, whether it is possible to lpay without using both die IS COMPLETELY BESIDE THE POINT. It's possible to shoot each other, that doesn't mean that isn't illegal. Possibility is never a justification for doing the wrong thing. I challenge every player on the site to never use a bug to their advantage. It not only tarnishes your reputation but it makes you an awful player because you have not learned to play backgammon and as such makes you worse than someone trying hard to do the right thing even though they may be tempted to cheat.

6. 九月 2003, 04:18:42
rgbdbg 
题目: Re: Rules of Backgammon
California man, the matter here isn't really one of backgammon, but rather rules, software, and sportmanship.

I have to agree with you. I checked the posted rules on backgammon here on this site, and there is no mention of the deviation from the game what one would expect to play as backgammon.

In fairness, the one-die deviation should be posted in the on-site backgammon rules until the game deviation is fixed, if ever. It took IYT awhile to get their backgammon software up to snuff. BK is a young site; I'm sure it will take awhile for everything to get worked out here.

Since the software allows for only one die to be played when bearing off, it's not really cheating when one exercises that option, but it is not very sporting. I personally would never exercise that option.

For the short period that BK has been online, Fencer & company have done an outstanding job. We just need to be patient for perfection. :-)

btw, you do have the highest backgammon rating at BK, so expect some unsportsmanship from those who can not defeat you otherwise, and just don't play them anymore in social games. Some people just don't take losing well.

Congrats on your outstanding backgammon BKR.

peace

6. 九月 2003, 02:12:36
danoschek 
题目: Re: Rules of Backgammon
you're wrong not only at which board to use for your objection,
as already mentioned - there's a debate from several weeks ago ...

and here, indeed it is allowed ... rules are
a manner of agreement and not of a personal view ... ~*~

6. 九月 2003, 02:06:52
california man 
题目: Rules of Backgammon
You cannot use just one dice and have a acompleted play,Nowhere in the world is that allowed, "Gold Token" and Daily Gammon have solved that problem of making just one move, the game will not progress, Also, To allow time to run out when you are losing should cost the quitter points and the winner plus points.....I can't see myself paying to play here when these problems continue to exist, Also, the scoring system here is "for the birds".........california man,,,,,,,

6. 九月 2003, 00:19:50
Uil 
题目: Re:
I am sure Linjon complaining does not help to get the site better and faster, but messages after a pretty rude answer from Fencer as "applauding" and "well said" and messages like that sure don't help

5. 九月 2003, 23:47:39
harley 
Thanks Jason, thats pretty much what I was trying to say! If the game allows it then it can't be classed as true cheating. It may be the other player has never played it before and doesn't know any different.
Anyway this really belongs on the backgammon board :o)

5. 九月 2003, 23:43:13
Jason 
i think there has been a big debate about this a few months back harley . some people say its cheating if you dont use both dice ,others dont agree . me personally always use both (even if it would lose me the game ) but if my opponent didnt use both dice then i feel i couldnt call them a cheat .. because the game allows it . just my opinion ;)

5. 九月 2003, 23:38:03
harley 
I think Fencer is aware of the dice problem in gammons? I'm sure I've seen it discussed on the backgammon board, but I could be wrong.
If this is the problem then its not eactly cheating... well, it is but the programme here allows it (for now), so it can't be helped.
I meant if there is an outside programme being used or anything like that. If it is just a disagreement on the dice then its best sorted with a polite message to your opponent. It may be they had not noticed the move?

5. 九月 2003, 23:37:03
Jason 
yes you can delete a game without affecting your bkr ,

5. 九月 2003, 23:34:10
ellieoop 
题目: DELETING
can someone tell me for sure, if you can delete a game after just 1 move, without penalizing your rating?
thx. ellie

5. 九月 2003, 23:27:44
ellieoop 
题目: Re:
there is a way to cheat in the gammons, by not using both dice when you can by swapping them, there is a bug in the gammons here. like harley said, it should be reported to fencer.

5. 九月 2003, 20:47:29
harley 
I guess if its serious cheating then Fencer should hear about it. He is the owner of the site. But I'm not sure how you can cheat on here?

5. 九月 2003, 20:35:36
california man 
题目: cheating in backgammon
To whom do I report such matters? califorina man

5. 九月 2003, 10:19:42
tonyh 
题目: Re: Im sorry
Bernice - I was happily playing on the site at 8.56 am (your message time); it is always the best time of the day. Hardly ever get any time-outs from now until noon.
So maybe it could be an Aussie problem; does Whisperz have your kind of problems?

5. 九月 2003, 10:12:46
Fencer 
Wait a minute.

5. 九月 2003, 10:08:15
Crissie 
题目: Re:
Fencer: Game id# 185618 is back on my games to play again, LOL. When you get a chance could you please fix it? Or if it would be easier I'll just move a piece out then back in again... hmmm... would that work? Thanks :o)

5. 九月 2003, 09:56:24
Bernice 
题目: Im sorry
to the 49 people that are waiting for me to have my turn...Im having terrible problems accessing any sort of games, as probably a lot of other people :(....love this site, but???....Fencer this is the main BRAINKING.COM page, and im afraid i cant see here an explanation of what is going on....the general chat board is way out of my depth ( reading wise)...too many messages...sorry

5. 九月 2003, 09:18:35
Crissie 
Fencer: I made the move again, however, it is still showing on opponent's turn to move, instead of a win.

5. 九月 2003, 09:03:00
Fencer 
Crissie: Try it again.

5. 九月 2003, 08:48:16
Crissie 
Fencer (or anyone): could you please look at game id# 185618? I already moved all of my pieces to win but it is still allowing moves. :o)

5. 九月 2003, 04:11:03
annabria 
题目: Re:
Fencer was accused of making an "inflammatory" remark (my words and spelling) about a user that posted a remarkably lackluster compaint. I think it is outrageous that anyone would bother the poor man after the last few days, especially when they play for free. You will have to scroll back a ways, there is a lot of litter on the highway

<< <   636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645   > >>
日期和时间
在线的朋友
最喜欢的讨论板
朋友群
每日提示
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有
回顶端