playBunny: lol

frolind: I've got google ads blocked. I'd tell you how but you've got me blocked! Lol.

frolind: Don't use Internet Explorer.

frolind: I came on about twenty minutes ago thru Google (my Home Page - pop ups blocked tho) - no problems here - played my games, looked around, etc... :)

Anyone else experiencing that the page loads takes 2-3 minutes, with "Connecting to pagead2.googlesyndication.com.." in the status bar?

I've never noticed any ads here after logging in.

Long time Fencer

alanback: LMFAO

playBunny: OMG....you 2 are so funny lOLOL

playBunny: I read your message with Disnay. I fear you are a Lyin' King. Or else you're just Goofy.

BerniceC: Walt a pity. But Disnay worry me so far. ;-)

(I know, I know ... poetic licence)

BIG BAD WOLF: it is just that Walt Disney is very touchy about usage...but if they were in public domain I guess it could be alright :)...just a query :)

BerniceC: As far as I know, when I got the images there were in the public domain free to use. So as long as money was not made from them, they should be OK to use - again, as far as I know.

BIG BAD WOLF: but with some of those you would have to be aware of copyright??

alanback: Yes, for the small picture - you can e-mail it to fencer at fencer@brainking.com - make sure you include your user name (and user # is also helpful if you know it.)

40x50 pixel picture - jpg format.

If anyone does not know how to do that and would like to use one that I set up - I'm pretty sure if you send Fencer a PM and let him know the page I listed below, and let him know which icon you would like to use, Fencer can pull it from there himself.

BIG BAD WOLF: Very nice. And to get one displayed, you just send it to Fencer?

Pioneer54: I made up some extra awhile back (already correctly sized) and open to anyone to use:

http://coan.net/2/

I actually have about 10 more that I made that I have not added to the page yet. When I change mine, I normally make a few to see which one I like best sized that small.

Again, the ones in the link are open for anyone to use if they want.

Pioneer54: You just find your own and send it to Fencer. Photo or any picture you like.

alanback: LMAO

pauloaguia: thanks tons, & tazman too - i'll try to remember your advice, though not act on it too frequently! :)

The storkatar brings them.

Where do the avatars come from?

dams: the only silly question is the un-asked one!

dams: It means that there are 22x games with the same characteristics waiting (same challenger, color, period, etc).
If you accept one of those invites, it will decrese (to 21x in your example)

This must have been asked - and answered - several times before, but since browsing through 300-odd pages is well-nigh impossible, hope someone will whet my curiousity:

In the Waiting Games page, below some games one finds in parantheses "nx", like (3x), (22x) etc. What does the number n stand for? Thanks 4 an answer from anyone.

ScarletRose:

alanback: I think Princess Alison meant she was having problems with the site yesterday..

Kipling ~ "Is anyone having problems with games loading?"

Princess Alison ~ "I was yesterday, but not today"

alanback: pardon??

Princess Alison: You left the UK today?

I was yesterday, but not today

Kipling: If you are in the UK yes!

Is anyone having problems with games loading?

Dryznik: Actually, as site owner, financier, developer and host Fencer probably really is the lone King of the Hill :)

Dryznik: i'm somewhat new to brainking, but i'll take this site over iyt

playBunny: Fencer does sound like he is the lone King Of The Hill. ;) It has been a long time since I played Ladders and I'm done with IYT. I just have to get used to Stairs and this site. Most everything is improvable in kife and play. Thanks for all comments. ;~)

Dryznik: The IYT Ladder system allows you to challenge 2 people within 20 places above yourself and have 2 challenges from other people below.

The BrainKing Stairs allows you to choose from 4 Steps (your own and the three below). That can mean a greater or lesser choice of players depending on how many people there are on those Steps. The fact that you look down rather than up to choose an opponent is a new perspective. It's too early to say how well it's going to work.

The GoldToken Ladders are the real "program induced" ones. Players are assigned to play one other on their current Step at random. That's neither a good thing nor a bad thing.

Fencer doesn't intend to sound rude when he says suck it up or go away... lolol.

Dryznik: You remember wrong. You could only play a maximum of 4 games in any one ladder and you were limited to playing those within a certain limit on the ladder.

Dryznik: Do not forget we have a Discussion board to talk about stairs.

Anyway, the computer program does not pick who you can play - you can choose anyone on the same (or below) level as you to play.

Dryznik: Your "freedom living" is to choose a site which fulfils your criteria the most. Nobody is forced to play here. Our system is our system and I won't change it.

As I recall Ladders at IYT any lower rung player could challenge anyone on the ladder and have several games going at once on that Ladder. That made challenges and play more worth playing--instead of 'program induced' persons to play! Not able to choose who one plays is like losing freedom living. Isn't Brainking made up of teamwork to make the site, games and player's challenges better for overal enjoyment?

I read the rules and i was wrong.
I am sory.

Fencer: Whats the game-id.

frolind: Two moves before.

kondiau: Hardly to check without the game ID.

kondiau: And with "checked him before", do you mean that you checked him in your last move before his rocade?

Can somebody tell me whats happening. I played a game of chess with a person who was able to do a rockad even though i checked him before. My question is.
How was he able to make that move...
Thanks for your time.
Greetings kondiau.

Fencer: I suppose my writing style might have led you to believe I was complaining, but I was questioning the workings of it. It doesn't make sense to me and if I was going to play it I needed that resolved well enough for me to give it a try. Just because you put a lot of time and effort into something doesn't mean that what is created is final, complete, or finished. This site itself is a good example of that, let alone any additions you make to it.

I will save any further questions I have for the "Stairs" feature for that board .

Walter Montego: What I want to say is that I spent too much time and effort to create the Stairs system and I don't want to change it when one person complains. A perfect system doesn't exist and there will be always someone who doesn't like it.
Btw, there is Stairs discussion board.

Walter Montego: From the few times I have played in some similar "ladders", I remember that the biggest point of the system is that the person you challenge can't decline, so you will get to play opponents that would have declined your challenge in normal time.

playBunny: But since you're now below him, he can challenge you, but you can't challenge him? I don't understand the reasoning behind this.

Thanks Fencer for explaining that I don't need to play it. I already understand that. Every time you've added something new to the site, there's always been questions about it. Remember when you added Ponds? Lots of people complained or suggested changes. You made a few of them. That's all I was doing by quetioning this "Stairs" deal you've added. You don't want my comments? Fine, I'll keep them to myself.