用户名: 密码:
新用户注册
监管者: Fencer 
 Stairs

Discuss about the BrainKing Stairs.

  • Stairs Rules
  • To find out what stairs you can currently challenge someone in, first go to the Main Stairs Page, then click on "Show your stairs only" link. The ones in BOLD are ones you can make a challenge in.
    .


    每页的消息:
    讨论板列表
    您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑马级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。
    状态: 所有人能发表
    帖子搜索:  

    << <   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   > >>
    21. 二月 2007, 15:33:30
    ~Tommes Pommes~ 
    题目: Say no to an invite?
    Hello, if someone invites me to a stair-game - can I say No to the invite or must I accept it?

    18. 二月 2007, 21:55:28
    ~Tommes Pommes~ 
    题目: Re: Opponents
    BIG BAD WOLF: I was in a stair but went out of it when I see. that I can't challenge every player.
    But I think the answer before yours is a good help: "...challange anyone in your step that isn't currently involved in a stairs match..."
    But thanks for your help!

    18. 二月 2007, 20:58:55
    coan.net 
    题目: Re: Opponents
    Tommes_Pommes: I'm looking at your profile, and don't see you involved in any stairs. Are you currently retired or something?

    18. 二月 2007, 20:48:05
    jessica 
    you should be able to challange anyone in your step that isn't currently involved in a stairs match or resigning from the stairs.

    18. 二月 2007, 20:45:46
    ~Tommes Pommes~ 
    题目: Opponents
    Why can't I choose any player from my step?

    18. 一月 2007, 20:28:46
    Fencer 
    题目: Re: More choice..
    whirlybabe: I don't want to create more public stairs but there is a possibility to make any kind of stairs in fellowships.

    18. 一月 2007, 18:24:16
    whirlybabe 
    题目: More choice..
    Could there be 3-wins stairs, please?

    12. 一月 2007, 18:36:23
    Andersp 
    题目: Re:
    alanback: My "crime" was that i said something about Fencer's autopasspromise..i deleted that post

    12. 一月 2007, 18:34:06
    alanback 
    题目: Re:
    Fencer: What's off topic about "Yup"?

    12. 一月 2007, 17:34:17
    Andersp 
    题目: Re:
    Andersp修改(12. 一月 2007, 17:50:13)
    Fencer: sorry, this board should of course be as much on topic as BrainKing.com is

    12. 一月 2007, 17:16:28
    Fencer 
    题目: Re:
    Andersp: No off topic please. This board is about Stairs.

    12. 一月 2007, 16:41:30
    Fencer 
    题目: Re:
    Andersp: I mean, tomorrow it will be 14 days.

    12. 一月 2007, 16:40:59
    Andersp 
    题目: Re:
    Fencer: yup

    12. 一月 2007, 16:40:12
    Fencer 
    题目: Re:
    Andersp: 14 days.

    12. 一月 2007, 16:39:12
    Andersp 
    题目: Re:
    Czuch Czuckers: I just checked...our last game was finished dec 30..so i guess it should be ok tomorrow

    12. 一月 2007, 16:22:57
    Czuch 
    How come in these stairs Very Fast Fischer's Stairs Andersp cannot invite me to a game?

    27. 十一月 2006, 11:03:34
    aaru 
    Thanks Picasso1012

    27. 十一月 2006, 08:51:54
    aaru 

    23. 十一月 2006, 16:06:10
    Adaptable Ali 
    题目: Re:
    aaru: nooooooo dont display our game, i will get laughed at LOL

    23. 十一月 2006, 15:19:28
    aaru 
    Fast Stairs
    Small Pente
    Pente (xmas is soon vs. aaru)
    ;)
    thx

    23. 十一月 2006, 14:43:17
    Adaptable Ali 
    题目: Re:
    aaru: I've signed up, but haveny a clue how to play it lol

    23. 十一月 2006, 09:16:09
    aaru 

    14. 十一月 2006, 09:08:53
    Adaptable Ali 
    题目: Re:
    WellyWales: Excuse me, i wasnt and havent gone running to Fencer, i was merely asking how it could be done.

    13. 十一月 2006, 12:10:00
    WellyWales 
    题目: Re:
    WellyWales修改(13. 十一月 2006, 12:14:42)
    xmas is soon: Do you mean me? I will remove myself, no need to run to Fencer...I am sorry about that, you can be on top now

    13. 十一月 2006, 10:37:25
    Adaptable Ali 
    题目: Re:
    Vikings: OK i will pm Fencer. The ex-player cant remove himself becasue hhe isnt in the feloowship anymore. Thanks for your advice anyway

    13. 十一月 2006, 00:34:36
    Vikings 
    scratch that, I didn't read it right, the only 2 ways I know to remove them from the stair would be to 1. pm them and ask them to remove themselves. or 2. ask fencer

    13. 十一月 2006, 00:29:58
    Vikings 
    题目: Re:
    xmas is soon: on the main page of the fellowship, right under the player list there is a box for removal of members

    13. 十一月 2006, 00:23:41
    Adaptable Ali 
    I have somebody on a top stair, who is no longer in my fellowship, how can i remove them?

    12. 十一月 2006, 19:35:38
    Vikings 
    题目: Re: Sweeping up the leaves...
    playBunny: thats good

    12. 十一月 2006, 18:26:28
    srnity 
    题目: Re: Sweeping up the leaves...
    playBunny: I second that one

    12. 十一月 2006, 17:10:59
    playBunny 
    题目: Sweeping up the leaves...
    pauloaguia: Simplest rule of all. Timeout on the bottom step and you're off the Stairs.

    11. 十一月 2006, 17:33:27
    rod03801 
    题目: Re:
    pauloaguia: I was talking about how people are saying things about being informed when there are challenges available, without having to go to that list and check.

    11. 十一月 2006, 16:45:07
    pauloaguia 
    题目: Re:
    rod03801: There's a link on the Stairs page that displays only the Stairs you're in. If you can make a challenge in any one of them, that Stair is displayed differently...
    Or are you talking about fellowships? I wouldn't know how those are displayed, then... :/

    11. 十一月 2006, 16:41:53
    rod03801 
    题目: Re:
    MadMonkey: I suggested a year ago or so, having a red number in parentheses next to the Stairs link, that would be clickable. This number would be the number of stairs you are in where you can make a challenge. When clicking on it, it would take you to your personal list of stairs. (The same page you get when clicking "Show me my Stairs Only"), where you would see those you can make a challenge in, in bold.
    Obviously, there will be occasions (relatively rare, I imagine) that you click on this number, and there may no longer be a challenge available. I guess that depends on how often that red number can be updated. I imagine pretty quickly, since the other red numbers are updated instantly.

    10. 十一月 2006, 23:04:15
    MadMonkey 
    题目: Re:
    BIG BAD WOLF: I like that idea, i put that in my Brainking DB post. There has to be a time limit somewhere before they are removed or retired. I could not possibly challenge on all the Stairs i am in, although i do try to keep up.
    I think that Brainking should still run a script once a week to see what ones you are open for a challenge on. Sometimes i finish a game & go to the Stair in question and there is no one to challenge, but who is to say 2 hours later there wont be ?
    To save having to check all the time we could have a message sent to us listing what Stairs we can make/except a challenge on.

    10. 十一月 2006, 23:03:56
    Vikings 
    题目: Re:
    BIG BAD WOLF: agreed, but in my case, I never challange anyone below me, only equal to me, that does not make me inactive, just in waiting for someone who has earned the privillage of the challange, if someone is above me, then I don't expect them to play me, I have to work myself to their level, ladders in reverse

    10. 十一月 2006, 22:58:16
    coan.net 
    I don't like the idea of it punishing someone who does not challenge - for example, myself - I'm not challenging anyone until I get my total number of games down, but I will take any challenge.

    I think if a person is not on the site for 1 month, then they should be placed in retirement so no one can challenge them. That would be my vote. (And if the person comes back to the site, they can unretire and continue from where they were at.)

    10. 十一月 2006, 22:57:10
    MadMonkey 
    题目: Re:
    MadMonkey修改(10. 十一月 2006, 22:58:27)
    Vikings: I understand what you are saying, in that case they would have to be an exception to the rule, but they would still be in-active.
    There has to be some sort of rule set i think. Maybe they have to challenge if someone is one step below them & available.
    Something would have to be there though to check they still are an active player on Brainking.
    Until Fencer gives us his views or what he intends to do with the Stairs(if anything) all we can do is come up with ideas lol

    10. 十一月 2006, 22:41:09
    Vikings 
    题目: Re:
    MadMonkey: why should someone at the top have to challange someone 3 steps below them, they have already earned the top spot and only have to defend it when someone reaches them

    10. 十一月 2006, 22:38:07
    MadMonkey 
    题目: Re:
    Vikings: I did put on the Brainking DB earlier that the script could also check if a person does not have anyone to challenge, then it would not effect them, hence if you are at the top, you stay there, but when a person becomes available you should have to challenge someone after a certain time.

    10. 十一月 2006, 22:37:05
    Vikings 
    题目: Re:
    pauloaguia: those people tend to run out of vacation days and time out quickly, otherwise they are active and just slow, another problem altogether

    10. 十一月 2006, 21:50:49
    pauloaguia 
    题目: Re:
    Vikings: Or that new people starting on a stair have no option other to battle those that are already inactive (waiting sometimes almost a month before climbing up and maybe playing a game for real).

    Also, with all the inactive players pilling up in the first level, the staircase may grow articially longer than it should be...

    10. 十一月 2006, 21:43:29
    Vikings 
    actually people who are inactive (either from the site or the stair) will take care of themselves over time, they will fall to the lowest step and the stair will grow well past them, the only real problem is the fact that many people don't like cheap wins

    10. 十一月 2006, 21:31:50
    pauloaguia 
    题目: Re:
    Vikings: hence the alternative I proposed...

    10. 十一月 2006, 21:28:21
    Vikings 
    题目: Re:
    MadMonkey: Fencer was already going to impliment taking away of empty stairs, I believe he said monthly, but your suggestion punishes the person who makes it to the top and then wants to wait for someone to catch up, he should not have to play until someone proves worthy

    10. 十一月 2006, 19:49:45
    pauloaguia 
    题目: Re:
    MadMonkey: Probably easier to implement:
    If you timeout all your games in a match you get automatically thrown out, with a message telling you why.

    Only exception - you have already retired from the stairs (to prevent the case that you legitimatelly retired for going on holiday or something but had already a game running that you timed out). In that case you get to stay in the Stairs.

    10. 十一月 2006, 18:50:26
    MadMonkey 
    题目: Re:
    Vikings: Brainking should be able to check each player/step to see if there are people for them to play. Maybe an automated message could be sent to them. If they do not play anyone after a certain time of being available then, either removed from the stairs or dropped a place. It could all be done automatically after Fencer writes the code

    10. 十一月 2006, 17:53:05
    King Reza 
    题目: Re:
    Vikings:

    10. 十一月 2006, 17:51:57
    Vikings 
    题目: Re:
    King Reza: that can be a little tricky as there are some people who have reached the top of the stairs and are inactive waiting for someone to catch them

    10. 十一月 2006, 15:10:19
    King Reza 
    题目: Re:
    MadMonkey:Oh thanks for the offer.  Yeah, I think they should be taken out of stairs after a period of time too.

    << <   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   > >>
  • 日期和时间
    在线的朋友
    最喜欢的讨论板
    朋友群
    每日提示
    Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有
    回顶端