Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
It was around the 12th of June when guantanamo went Palau, a good solution for 17 Uyghurs. All that China had to protest (they only protest and do not have the power for more), these Uyghurs are suspected terrorists. Listen Chinese: We do not care about what you think.
Chinas contribution to the world problems (money, Guantanamo, trading) is none. They like to look hyper correct, but their way is abuse. They pest their environment to be able to deliver us their TRASH. Typical transgressors the chinese.
Tuesday: Isnt it one and the same smile. It needs something in ones head to understand that those who lost an election (lets say the republicans with Obama) AND those who don't go to the ballot usually build the majority. Obama's no saint, he's under watch as everyone else too.
Tuesday: Demos are ment to protest ok. But it often enough makes not more than a silly 'I'm mighty'-smile on the faces of the transgressors. It's all about good mood, bad mood in this ugly circles. It doesn't need big demos to bring down the mood of a failed politician. It's all about mood. There is no violence needed, no stike, no masses needed IMO, I have my own ways.
题目: Re:I would have destroyed his ego to start with.
gogul: And that can be more destructive if done. Such destruction has been likened to taking a sledge hammer to a brick wall surrounded by glass houses.
Tuesday: Michael was fine, but if i would have been the one helping him, I would have destroyed his ego to start with. He didn't need the excess, nobody needs.
Tuesday: Michael gave up his life to sharks, that is sad for this man. That is the lesson, make your own coffee yourself, choose the color of your socks yourself, wash yourself in the bathroom. Not the you and me kind of problems.
题目: Re:omosexuals are tired as being seen as predators.
Tuesday: Sexuality has nothing to do with abuse or predatory acts. A heterosexual man or woman is just as likely to commit such acts as someone who is gay. I think the stats (though I'm not 100%) say that heterosexual people are more likely, but if that is due to the difference in numbers of sexual preference I'm not sure.
It's all down to a long cycle and whether you are the 'one in eight', as I'm led to believe that is the likelihood of such a mindset being passed down from one generation of abused->abuser.
You don't solve your problems by taking a look at mj's life. People who don't know how to get decent, I don't know. Should I care? All that michael can teach is a howto 'be a puffed up ego' in five steps.
gogul: You know some people know they need to solve problems but don't know how.... or put into a state where they think such solving is not possible, or find such a task too daunting.
"Aww" reminds me of attitudes that have kept the cycle of abuse going, people led to believe that what they have been through is an unmentioned subject. It's normal...
It is not.
And if MJ's life leads to even just a small number of adults and children escaping such a vicious cycle then it'll never be a waste.
That's like the people who think that their spleens, little maniac tendencies, crazy ideas, their sweet depressions and all these bugs are tools to stress their surrounding. One day you come to a point where it is too late to solve your personal problems, and then you get the mess.
(V): Right. there is michael, there are kids, there is his daddy and his family. Michael serves as an example of somebody who didn't see the need to solve his personal problems. Lost childhood the poor michael? Aww
gogul: Politically.. not really... but as a matter of human interest... no.
We don't want to go back to the old days of abuse being hidden and not talked about.
And it is a politically talked about subject here in the UK, as several cases of abuse have come to light through those who are supposed to monitor at risk children have let down children resulting in deaths. Some people have lost their jobs over certain cases.
Tuesday: If (as I've never seen any proof) Michael J had the skin disease then by all means he had the right to sort out that problem... But he started changing his appearance before the skin disorder became publicly known.
IMO many of his family were affected. Looking at how some of his brothers and sisters talk and look Michael was not the only one to suffer from his fathers wrath. He was just the most evident of the affect of long term abuse.
I'm not dissing him, just being honest in my thoughts.
There have been many cases come to light of long term abuse recently.. especially about one in Austria.... It can devastate a persons emotional growth.
As to him committing homosexual acts with these kids... unknown. But statistically the odds are that he might have had some out of the norm emotional deviations. Yet thanks to the first case being settled out of court, unless someone opens up we will never be quite sure.