用户名: 密码:
新用户注册
监管者: Vikings 
 Politics

Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.


All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..

As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.

Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!


*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."


每页的消息:
讨论板列表
您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑兵级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。
状态: 所有人能发表
帖子搜索:  

<< <   177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186   > >>
3. 十月 2010, 00:55:11
rod03801 
题目: Re: that is why we are truly a free country
Artful Dodger: Yeah, Hannity's radio show deals with that a lot. He always tries to get the libs that call to tell him one great thing that the anointed one has done or has been successful at. Very rarely do they list anything specific. They either turn to bashing the past president, or keep talking in generalizations. I love his show.

3. 十月 2010, 00:53:24
Bernice 
题目: Re:
Bernice修改(3. 十月 2010, 03:12:15)
Artful Dodger: you said..."too lazy" and that is another reason why obesity is so rife in our communities.

Weekday,get up out of your comfortable chair and twiddle a nob for gods sake. LOL

It is amazing as you say how people want to be controlled, but then some find that is a turn-on.

3. 十月 2010, 00:46:05
rod03801 
题目: Re: that is why we are truly a free country
(V): Doesn't bother me, you calling him that. He was a nasty president too.

I'm sure I have stated over time that I'm truly not a fan of either "defined" major politcal party in the USA.

I am NO fan of Bush.

3. 十月 2010, 00:45:01
Bernice 
题目: Re: that is why we are truly a free country
Bernice修改(3. 十月 2010, 00:47:11)
rod03801: we have the same set up of Govt...3 levels that is...it is generally thought where I live that, that is one too many, so really the only one to go would have to be the Local one. The cost of the 3 is phenomenal and getting rid of the lower levels would save billions of dollars per year that could be put to better use.

as for the level of noise in TV advertising....what the hell is stopping pefople from using their "mute" button...

3. 十月 2010, 00:44:24
Mort 
题目: Re: that is why we are truly a free country
rod03801: So when Bush had protesters against the Iraq war moved away from the route he was taking to special zones.... he was being what??

A Fascist dictator?

3. 十月 2010, 00:37:44
rod03801 
题目: Re: that is why we are truly a free country
rod03801修改(3. 十月 2010, 00:38:13)
(V): This country has an ingenious set up, (or it DID originally, unfortunately we have a socialist dictator who sees differently), where there are (simply) 3 levels of government. Federal, State, and Local. The Federal level was NEVER intended to INTRUDE upon our lives the way it is starting to do. Really, the level CLOSEST to the common person is the one that should be most involved in our lives. You don't like what your local government is doing, you either vote them out, or you MOVE to an area that is suitable to what you want.

Stupid votes like the volume of TV commercials irritate me, and if I find out that someone I CAN vote for was responsible for wasting the federal government's time with it then I will certainly keep that in mind with the next election. Now, the FCC is a totally different thing. THAT was set up for that sort of thing, and if THEY had regulated on it? Well, I would probably feel differently. (I'm NOT against people lowering the volume on commercials. LOL. I agree completely, it's annoying. It's NOT the job of the SENATE to decide that though.)

3. 十月 2010, 00:06:46
Bernice 
I find this an hilarious conversation on free speech

it sure as hell doesn't happen in here does it, when your opinions have to be passed by someone who thinks they are a higher being.

I wonder if this will get passed.....

2. 十月 2010, 23:21:06
Mort 
Sounds like if you have a big business and like to trample on the little people.. move your business to the USA!!

2. 十月 2010, 23:19:37
Mort 
题目: Re: that is why we are truly a free country
Vikings: Really?

It sounds like the only free 'people' are the big companies who you'll let trample all over you anytime, anyplace.. anywhere..... As long as local law says it's ok.. even if they might be bought (as has happened in the past)... you have no rights but to lobby (timely) or move.

.. That's really great... NOT!!

2. 十月 2010, 23:10:16
Vikings 
题目: Re: I am posting a sign that warns of trespassing,
Vikings修改(2. 十月 2010, 23:10:49)
(V): it's obvious that you don't understand the meaning of the UNITED STATES, Each state has the right to make up their own own laws, you see the constitution was designed to protect us, the citizens, from the federal government over reaching it's authority, that is why we are truly a free country

2. 十月 2010, 23:05:26
Mort 
题目: Re: I am posting a sign that warns of trespassing,
Vikings: Within the law?? Now you are saying you can trespass and affect mob rule on a business.

"local business here have been run out of town by not being citizen friendly."

What happened to free speech??

2. 十月 2010, 23:02:04
Vikings 
题目: Re: I am posting a sign that warns of trespassing,
Vikings修改(2. 十月 2010, 23:03:11)
(V): and since you have brought this example up, look at New York, they are loosing many of their highest tax base because they do not like what the local government is doing and the town will suffer untill the will of the people have worked their magic

2. 十月 2010, 22:59:09
Vikings 
题目: Re: I am posting a sign that warns of trespassing,
Vikings修改(2. 十月 2010, 22:59:25)
(V): bussiness have the right to do whatever is within the law,you are twisting it all around, local business here have been run out of town by not being citizen friendly.

and I wouldn't want to live in such a corrupt town , they wouldn't be getting my tax money for long, as it is my right to live where I want to live

2. 十月 2010, 22:50:33
Mort 
题目: Re: I am posting a sign that warns of trespassing,
Vikings: IF it did happen you are powerless you are saying... I mean, some councilmen might have a nice job lined up after via the advertising company and not give a damn. Lobbying can take a while...

.. basically it sounds like you are saying businesses have the right to do whatever and your rights don't matter as it's a business?

2. 十月 2010, 22:45:37
Vikings 
题目: Re: I am posting a sign that warns of trespassing,
(V): That won;t liklely happen as even city councilmen like to be re-elected, and that wouldn't be very likely the case once you brought it up to the attention of the local media, but if that wasn't to be the case, you'd have the right to put up with it or move or lobby against it

2. 十月 2010, 22:41:51
Mort 
题目: Re: I am posting a sign that warns of trespassing,
Vikings: So if the local gov was bought out ... then what?

2. 十月 2010, 22:40:18
Vikings 
题目: Re: I am posting a sign that warns of trespassing,
(V): yes you can, it is called local jurisdiction, a city ordinance which is different
but you were talking about the federal government not local government, try again

2. 十月 2010, 22:38:17
Mort 
题目: Re: I am posting a sign that warns of trespassing,
Vikings: Ok.. but someone could if they wanted to place an advert 100 feet tall (with permission of the land owners) opposite your house selling say.. "Obama healthcare works" in neon lights.. and you can't do anything?

2. 十月 2010, 22:35:10
Vikings 
题目: Re: I am posting a sign that warns of trespassing,
(V): it is a criminal offense here, the severity depends on the situation, ie. inside or outside

2. 十月 2010, 22:30:46
Mort 
题目: Re: I am posting a sign that warns of trespassing,
Vikings: Isn't trespassing in the USA a civil offence like here in the UK.

ie sellers can still knock.. especially if they have no morals... which isn't unusual considering past records on what they will try and get upto.

2. 十月 2010, 22:19:17
Vikings 
题目: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution
Tuesday: I agree it's tasteless, just like flag burning and mosques 2 blocks from ground zero.
Our constitution never guaranteed that anything would be easy

2. 十月 2010, 22:18:34
Mort 
Mort修改(2. 十月 2010, 22:28:42)
Advert just on UK TV.....

A blonde woman dancing with moves suggesting the injection of drugs... she speaks claiming she is our addiction for a perfume who's name is based on opium.

Gee.. why not not just name it Eu da heroin!!

2. 十月 2010, 22:16:57
Vikings 
题目: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution
Tuesday: I am posting a sign that warns of trespassing, just like you can do by turning the chanel or complaining and boycotting that particular channel

2. 十月 2010, 22:14:33
Vikings 
题目: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution
Vikings: Unfortunately, it also means that some whako church group can stand outside a funeral of a fallen soldier and spew tasteless messages

2. 十月 2010, 22:11:45
Vikings 
题目: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution
Tuesday: Yes, unless I post clearly a "No soliciting" sign. And that happens all the time, every time someone makes news, the media camp out on that persons lawn until the story no longer fills their needs

2. 十月 2010, 22:08:41
Mort 
题目: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution
Vikings: First it was free speech.. now it's "speech".

Make up your mind!!

2. 十月 2010, 22:07:51
Vikings 
题目: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution
Tuesday: selling is a right, it is in the constitution, it's called THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS

2. 十月 2010, 22:06:14
Vikings 
题目: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution
(V): if you look it up on wikipedia you would find out that it was in fact judges that took that right away
and tell me how a comercial is not a form of speech, you can't

2. 十月 2010, 22:04:24
Vikings 
题目: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution
Tuesday: Its a privilage to drive, its a privilage to purchase a t.v., its a right to talk

2. 十月 2010, 22:02:07
Mort 
题目: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution
Vikings: They were talking about free speech not adverts... you have given NO proof, just an opinion.

That.. in the past adverts have been subject to legislation does suggest that you are wrong regardless of your stance of "free speech". As such, it is selling, not speaking or having an opinion.

2. 十月 2010, 22:00:13
Vikings 
题目: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution
Tuesday: apples and oranges, first of all it is up to the states to impliment the drivers liscense and laws. next I'm not aware as to where in the constitution that would be covered

2. 十月 2010, 21:57:33
Vikings 
You have touch on something very important, the first amendment doesn't require you to listen to those advertisements which goes right back to rods point

2. 十月 2010, 21:55:55
Vikings 
题目: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution
(V): you have given an opinion of your point of view. I haven given you proof that your opinion is just that your opinion(but free speech) and that it is a right of free speech, The amendment doesn't say "except when someone has an opinion as to what is free speech"

2. 十月 2010, 21:53:04
Mort 
题目: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution
Tuesday: I like to pause a prog as it starts.. then fast forward past the ads.

2. 十月 2010, 21:51:26
Mort 
题目: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution
Vikings: I already have explained my position. You are disagreeing stating it's free speech.. well then. Explain yourself.

If you are just exploiting a bit of the constitution to defend your point.. then just say so.

2. 十月 2010, 21:49:05
Vikings 
题目: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution
Tuesday:Having a T.V. is not a right, nobody forced you to purchase it, I agree it is annoying tho

2. 十月 2010, 21:47:50
Vikings 
题目: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution
(V): You send a signal to your nerve in your throat and that makes a muscle reverberate and noise comes out and whala speech is formed and that is deemed free by the first admendment

you explain how it is not

2. 十月 2010, 21:43:41
Mort 
题目: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution
Vikings: Adverts are free speech?? Explain how please.

2. 十月 2010, 21:42:22
Vikings 
题目: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution
(V): it's called free speech!

2. 十月 2010, 21:41:58
Vikings 
题目: Re:
Tuesday: to sue the government

<< <   177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186   > >>
日期和时间
在线的朋友
最喜欢的讨论板
朋友群
每日提示
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有
回顶端