.... and if someone want to cheat so bad, at least make them pay a little money to BrainKing for a membership! :-)

You know that is not a bad idea.

If someone really want to play in the $3,000 tournament, they should at least support BrainKing with a Knight membership!

I've been thinking a long time to start having some small $$ tournaments - and I would probable have them in my Fellowship - to reward people who support this site!

So should we just ban pawns?

Well my thinking is getting a persons information before the tournament will not help much.

If I wanted, I could make 1 ID and put my brother-in-law's name and address (and let him know if I win, I get the check) - I could then use my friends address, etc... etc... Along with other tricks, I could probable find 10 different ID and information to send in.

Also, for the "pawn" accounts - you could just send if fake information anyway - and just purposly lose with those accounts so you already know you are not going to get money sent to them!

Even though I understand trying to get rid of cheaters, I do not really see this helping much.

BBW (BIG BAD WOLF)

and what address would I give for these other Id's for payment?
I will save you the trouble...I just removed myself from the tourny.

if Fencer knows bwildman's addy and name he just cannot use
the same name and addy for other IDs, and if I'd invoke friends
any control-sense should volatilize at the latest ... ~*~

You are missing the point. While bwildman's info is in the contact database, you could have 3 other IDs in there also, so you have 4 chances to win the money. Remember, even those who win the section get money. You could have your other IDs lose to you on purpose if they are in the same section.

I am sorry, but if the information is not furnished, you are not playing in the event.

I joked too ... but a serious background, maybe here we
are just a bit sulky towards ashcrofted college-libraries ... ~*~ ;)

I have to agree with Danoschek...as its a Brain King hosted tourny,I would be more than happy to trust my personal information with Fencer. Nothing against the gothic inventer...who is to be in charge of the payouts...
But I would be happy to give Fencer my permission to release my personal information...only in the event I should be so fortunate to be a prize winner.

I joked before but this measure does seem reasonable to me and I do see the point. After all it is not everyday $3,000 is put up for grabs. I would assume in such a case that the sponsor would have a right to take certain precautions. Just my thoughts. :o)

you're right --- it's still your money ... :P

just to stop the going spin ... Fencer may reveal as soon as I win ...

lil peace poem ( peace-math -> if every1 else uncovers, I'm nailproof ) ... ~*~

Well it's my money. I won't pay it to someone who had more than one chance to scale to the top.

Sorry, my rules. If there was an entrance fee, you could pay as many times as you want, but as there is none, this is the way I will insure compliance.

I've got no 2nd ID in the tourney and,
I see it's idle and innecessary before the event ...

as ( just to re-iterate ) Fencer knows my name and addy ...

for the GCF whose privacy policy is entirely unknown to me,
I would use only a messenger for the inevitable cash traffic ... >8) ... ~*~

Just to reiterate, if the information is not supplied, I will assume it is because there are multiple IDs being used by the same person, and any and all such IDs without information attached will be removed from the event.

Those uncomfortable with this should remove themselves prior to the event.

I am sorry to impose this, but as I mentioned, someone could have multiple IDs created just to try and get and one or more section prizes.

I am sure everyone who does not have multiple IDs in the tournament will agree this is necessary. Those who object may be the ones who have created new IDs to cheat in the fashion mentioned.

You will notice several of the pawns in this event were created AFTER the tournament was announced.

I forsee the Pente ratings in a frolic flipping when all
our Maharadscha's siblings would take bk under siege ... :D
and actually they could do it without consulting, by their own strength ...

advisory during a game violates the rules of online-tourneys ...
- but, happens regardless of people living together or not ...

e.g. I have a spooky feeling when my online-opponents list
shows two people watching a game of one of them versus me ...

nonetheless I hope for an appropriate sportsmanship,
that no control cAn entirely ensure ... ~*~

Good point. In this case 8 would be more than enough. LOL (bad pun)
:o)

I would like everyone who is playing to submit the information, just to make sure there are not two of the same information. I think the multiple player per household is really just one way the strongest player in that household would try and circumvent the issue, so the family should elect one player only.

How would everyone feel, for example, if my family of 8 would participate with me?

:)

My addy and name are known to Fencer - that should be sufficient ... ~*~

So do people like me (who has about 0.05% chance of winning a section) have to worry about this?

Would 3 people from the same household (same address, same pc) be eligible to enter? Perhaps "one prize per household" should be a rule.

Someone called to my attention the fact that it would be easy to create multiple pawn IDs and increase one's chances of winning a section prize. So, in order to participate in the event, please send an email to GothicChessInfo@aol.com with the following information:

1. Your full name (checks to winners will only be paid out to what you send)
2. Your complete mailing address
3. Your ID that you will be using.

Before you win any money, you will also be required to submit your social security number for tax purposes. THIS WILL ONLY BE ASKED OF THOSE WHO ACTUALLY HAVE WON PRIZE MONEY. You will receive the appropriate tax schedule from us to sign and return prior to getting your check. Do yourself a favor and claim your winnings as income if you are a United States citizen!

The address provided is the only one we will send checks to.

If there are any screen names that have not registered the information prior to the start of the tournament, they will be removed from the event.

This is the only way I know of to insure that only one person is using one screen name.

Please pass this word to all you know who are in the tournament.

Fortress Fortune - one player missing
Janus' Eyes - two players missing

Now no longer mucking about -
To the weapons, Pawns ... Be a Knight ... :) ~*~

Congratulations neznalek, well done. :o)

The KM Invitational Corner Checkers tournament starts in a week. Not many people know how to play so don't be afraid to give it a try. Message me for an invite.

I hope things improve Jason. Let us know when you can take new games since most of my tournaments are by invite.

sorry but i have had to remove myself from about half a dozen Tournaments , due to me overstreching myself with the amount of games i already have , i am having problems trying to finish the games i have already (partly due to site problems) just thought i would leave a message here nothing personal . i will re sign back up if the situation changes
*jason*

I think he just has the "trapped pawn" problem. Pawns check into tournaments, but they don't check out :)

nothing serious...
Just waiting...
:)

What's the problem here? Could you be more specific?

I'm still involved in my first ever tourney here...
I think I ld still be playing this for awhile.. :)

I am still involved with the first tourney, and only tourney I have ever played in here, you do not have a legitimate beef. I am all for you returning to IYT, I hear it is a great place

excellent question

how can something you are not paying for be a rip off?

Backgammon CHAMPIONSHIP Invitational (1-10) - This is a tournament set up for the winners of the first 10 "fast start - first 5" backgammon tournaments that I have.

Well not all the games are played yet, but enough are played to determin the winner of the Backgammon CHAMPIONSHIP Invitational (1-10) tournament - and the winner is: neznalek

BBW (BIG BAD WOLF)

Is it possible to get out of a tournament after it has started, but before I have made any moves, without affecting my bkr? Thanks :)

To Reddog78 KM for thrashing all others in Kell's Checkered Past (including me LOL)

Starting in about a day, I have 2 fast tournament starting.

Time per move: 2 days

One game version - CLICK HERE TO JOIN!
Two game version - CLICK HERE TO JOIN!

Good luck to all!

BBW (BIG BAD WOLF)

C'mon guys - I know it was my fault to assume 15 players to be
no problem of resembling, Chess-Variants do not hurt I tl ya ... :D

the tournaments below will stay yet open until sunday, but then
sadly I'll have to close them to avoid idle chaining of pawns ...

in that case the Janus Tourney will be restarted as soon as
Fencer's is finished - maybe two simultaneously are too much yet ...


Fortress Fortune
Janus' Eyes

Entré - entré - voulons nous se rassembler ... :P ... (lil lure-poem) ... ~*~

No comment ;oÞ

Yeah, I've seen some of your crew....

Ill have to do it then, cos on our old ships, Rats are a problem LOL
Thanks Bumble :o)

That's okay, Steve. Just deposit €250,000 in my bank account by Monday - or the ship's cat gets it. lol

Good luck with your tournament!

I have seen Bumble has already done what I was thinking about, so thanks bumble, copied you LOL

There are now 5 sections set up to distinguish once and for all, who has the best Navy. Please sign up, I have added a section for the KM's cos we know they have a competitive edge to them and have their own fellowship for the boats :o) Good luck and have fun :o)

OK Thanks for help :o) ,
Ill have to rethink about how I can do what I wanna do then :o)
BTW chatty, I weren't gonna cheat, it was all in the name of fun :o) But then you know I aint no nasty anyways LOL

no, sorry steve you cannot set up who plays who! no cheating that way! Lol...

A quick question on tournies.
When setting one up, does the BK site select randomly who will play in sections, or can the person setting it up, organise that fully too?

Canadian, Australian, New Zealand etc, backgammon players to enter the 'Rest of the World' section of 'Bumble's World Tour'!

Hi all, does anyone know how far off we are from having these inter fellowship tournies? :o)

I use this opportunity to summon a strong *Hurray*
in praise of Erika and shaggath who made it as first
to win their 50th tournament at brainking ! good job, guys ~*~ :)

On a lighter note how about a Checkers Tournament with 3 move opening play? That would be nice