435152: "at first, i think the chinese chess discussion board needed a player like me to do more xiangqi game analysis."
"it is why i am better than all of your guys here."



but this is my last post. no more.

435152: I got sick of reading so much criticism from you about games other players play. Why not analyze your own games? Come on, tell us how good or bad you are. Or do you play perfectly?

"Quote removed"
This is a flaming comment as emmett said. Don´t mess players about their play just because they don´t do as a professional.
I hope that post will be your last one, really.

Edited only to remove the quote referenced, since I removed it from the original posts

435152: "how much you understand the different between chinese chess and chess? what's your online rating in both? how many years you have played chess?

Too many questions, aren´t they?. What are you getting at? Are you trying to "guess" my skill in chess by asking me those questions. Of course I could answer you, but that´s none of your business. The skill is shown by playing in an online chess server like ICC or FICS, not by asking impertinent questions. I gave you my opinion and you answered with "thank you for telling me that something as other players already knew.
you play chess ?", which is a stupid statement, with no argument at all. Let´s finish this. You have an opinion and I have mine, that´s all.

435152: Of course I play chess. It is my favourite game and I play it for years. I play in a club, in tournaments in team leagues,... so I tell you that players (I, we, others) play for the iniciative. It is quite simple. We, even, leave pawns to get the iniciative. With "in chess, you play for the pawn" you are showing a poor understanding of chess. And yes, I can talk about other players because I know lots of them.

435152: I don´t agree with you. In chess we also play for initiative as other players can tell you.