 |
|
 BrainKing.comBoard for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future. If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider). World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com Es ist Dir nicht erlaubt, Nachrichten in diesem Forum zu schreiben. Man muss dazu mindestens den Mitgliedsrang Brain Springer (Knight) haben! Modus: Jeder kann schreiben
<< < 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 > >> 25. Juli 2004, 22:10:23 Thema: Re: people who are not within your specified range, won't see your invitation. ~*~ 25. Juli 2004, 22:05:03 When I define a new game with a rating restriction, it still shows that my opponent will be "any player." Shouldn't it show that my opponent must have a rating within the parameters I selected? Looking at my invitations waiting for response, I would like to able to remind myself how I defined them. And maybe others seeing them would like to know what restrictions I made? 25. Juli 2004, 19:10:51 but looking to see if certain friend is on line now makes it awkward and easy to miss someone :o( 25. Juli 2004, 18:29:37  well the one advantage of last action, is you can tell quickly who just showed up. 25. Juli 2004, 17:56:07 last action I think Eriisa :o) I prefered it alphabetical 25. Juli 2004, 17:55:08 Thema: Friends I don't remember an answer to this before, so what the heck....
What order does the 'Friends Online' list? 25. Juli 2004, 15:48:38  Of course. There was a bug in new user registration process. My fault. 25. Juli 2004, 15:11:55 Thema: OK... I don't know then. What do you think could be the problem, Fencer? 25. Juli 2004, 15:09:19 All registered users can modify settings. 25. Juli 2004, 15:08:18 Thema: Hmmm... Maybe that is it. Are there any pawns that can confirm it? 25. Juli 2004, 15:04:34  Works for me but then I am using a pc! You can even put them in reverse alphabetical order..thanks for the tip rod! 25. Juli 2004, 15:03:49  pawns might not be able to modify settings like paid members can , not sure on that though ;) 25. Juli 2004, 13:59:52 Thema: Re: I don't know. I'm doing exactly as you said. I guess theres just something wrong with my system. Thanks for the advice anyway. 25. Juli 2004, 12:58:04 Verändert von rod03801 (25. Juli 2004, 12:59:38)  I am also on WebTV
Go to Who is Online. at the top of the chart you will see "Level, Name, Last action, etc... One of those columns will have a little green arrow by it.. Click on "Name" and the page will reload with all the people who are currently online in alphabetical order, and the green arrow will be by the Name column. It works fine. You must have done something wrong. 25. Juli 2004, 12:51:20 Thema: Sorry Sorry, rod. That didn't work( or maybe i did it wrong?). Is that the only way? I use web TV, does that make a difference? 25. Juli 2004, 12:31:48 Click the column where the names are, and it will be arranged alphabetically by the person's name. 25. Juli 2004, 11:45:47 Thema: Who is online Umm, I'm looking for a way to sort my "Who is online" list. Right now, it is in no type of order and repeats player's names multiple times. How (or can) I fix this? 24. Juli 2004, 23:15:38  ooops too late(about pming the now-pawn). i have another captain already!!! 24. Juli 2004, 23:11:59 Oh, I think I found the answer. Make someone else the captain. That works. 24. Juli 2004, 23:08:36 I PM'd mine that turned to pawns to see if they planned on renewing soon, first.. but you can always re-invite them if they upgrade again. 24. Juli 2004, 22:59:53 im booting out all the pawns there now. they cant be in one anyway! 24. Juli 2004, 22:59:21 yepp, no edit but next to the captain's name :) 24. Juli 2004, 22:54:40 Maybe in the team you have to edit them from captain to player before you can remove them as manager.. did you try it that way? 24. Juli 2004, 22:48:58 i couldnt change it from manager to member Harley. i tried. and there's no edit button next to his name in the team list. i think i'll just have to remove him 24. Juli 2004, 22:43:19 Thema: a similar problem occured on the fellowships board - fencer solved it, 23. July 2004, 05:35:47 ~*~ 24. Juli 2004, 22:43:05  My mistake! The 'edit' button is next to their name in the fellowship list. If you press that, it should give you the option to turn them into a 'member', and that should take away their captain status. 24. Juli 2004, 22:41:22 Antje, next to where it says 'captain', can't you use the edit button?
Otherwise its as Crissie says, you'd have to remove them from the fellowship. Maybe with a note to explain why? 24. Juli 2004, 22:28:53 i thought of that Crissie, to remove him from the fellowship. i havent done that yet (to anyone) i suppose thats the only way? 24. Juli 2004, 22:25:09 i wonder if you just go to the remove player option, and remove them if it would delete them as captain as well... just a thought :) 24. Juli 2004, 22:23:04 anyone able to help me on this? I have someone in my fellowship who has let their rook expire, (now a pawn). I need to remove that player from captain status on a team so i can add a new one. im not able to change his status from manager to member, and im not able to edit his captain status either. suggestions? 24. Juli 2004, 20:40:04 Thema: thank you :) Verändert von danoschek (24. Juli 2004, 20:40:18) I know it's an extra feature and no simple adjustment,
appreciating that you'll keep it in mind ... :") ... ~*~ 24. Juli 2004, 20:38:48 There are more important things to do at the moment. When they are finished, I might look at it. 24. Juli 2004, 20:35:02 Thema: So again Verändert von danoschek (24. Juli 2004, 20:39:11) will you finally do something about that flaw in the tournament logic ?
I mean - uhhhm neat that you think the one who loses is qualified, many of my opponents would support that *grin* but that does not fix the reality problem ... ~*~ 24. Juli 2004, 19:11:58 Thanx Bernice -- I would, but I'm happy enough with the little things in life, I possess no need to belong to anything or climb to the top of a browny hill and scream at the farmland below ~ until next... 24. Juli 2004, 18:51:10 24. Juli 2004, 18:42:15 Thema: builderq that's the way it is ... as mentioned, inessential if a valid direct comparison exists. ~*~ 24. Juli 2004, 18:37:29 Maybe there should be negative S-B, in which losses to weaker players matter more than to stronger ones? 24. Juli 2004, 18:18:13 Thema: you made it for me spammo attacks are just another problem every game server suffers ~*~ 24. Juli 2004, 18:17:14 I think Dano is trying to make a point about something LOL 24. Juli 2004, 18:15:38 Thema: before spammo attacks bury the original here the text - thanks Jason, for an opinion after all - excited LJ playing in my group should not be considered to be having an own one, naturally Verändert von danoschek (24. Juli 2004, 18:15:59) Another Flaw in the Tournaments
23. July 2004, 16:56:54 Simply said, an SB-Value is often pure humbug in small groups, Much better to take the direct encounter as first choice - if just two are level, the one who won the game between them, should rank higher (for that time) - beyond any doubt. ~*~ 24. Juli 2004, 18:13:33 I see you joined all 5 of my tourneys
No skin off my nose, there are no prizes in those. FYI I had no idea those battleboats tourneys were yours or that you removed me. I couldnt care less for your tournaments. I only joined because it was about to start. I will not boot you from mine though. 24. Juli 2004, 17:49:46 longjohn , likes to creep in where not wanted . even tourneys hes been removed from 24. Juli 2004, 17:48:34 others may have a differing opinion.
In this case, Fencer has a duifferent opinion. Both are correct 24. Juli 2004, 17:46:59 Thema: It is clear and the only perspective. Verändert von danoschek (24. Juli 2004, 17:47:15) direct comparison decides naturally, that's why it's handled that way worldwide but here. ~*~ 24. Juli 2004, 17:44:15 that is only one perspective.
Another argument could be made as to why the person that beat the other person lost to someone else that the other person beat. It is not a clear cut solution, it depends on the perspective it is looked though 24. Juli 2004, 17:41:25 Thema: of course it is, naturally Verändert von danoschek (24. Juli 2004, 17:43:37) if just TWO are level, and one defeated the other,
he's beyond ANY doubt better that time, that group . ~*~ << < 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 > >> |
Datum und Zeit
Freunde Online
Abonnierte Foren
Vereine
Tip des Tages
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Zurück nach oben |