Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
(V): This is what those who've never been in such a situation don't understand about wars on terror. The Northern Ireland situation went on for decades. An attack could happen at any time anywhere in the UK. Those fighting had no uniform, just their cause.
I dont buy any analogy between the war on terror and the civil war in north ireland.....what because they had no uniforms, and were fighting for a cause???? There were actual people who could sit down to reach a civil agreement, but not on the war on terror.... who do we get to have this conversation with to end the war on terror peacefully???? I can agree that there needs to be other fronts besides just killing them and shutting down their camps. more pro active and peaceful ways, but its rubbish to say that armys have no purpose and can have substitutes in every instance.
(verstecken) Benutze das Notizbuch um zu sehen wie dein Profil mit html-tags ausschauen wird bevor du die neuen Einstellungen sendest (nur für zahlende Mitglieder). (rednaz23) (zeige alle Tips)