Do you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board! If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board.
Liste der Diskussionsforen
Es ist Dir nicht erlaubt, Nachrichten in diesem Forum zu schreiben. Man muss dazu mindestens den Mitgliedsrang Brain Springer (Knight) haben!
The current setup would require the player who has just been hit to click the submit button (as in BG when you cannot move). Obviously this is stupid but there you have it.
I suggest we move the rest of this to the Backgammon board since it's beyond a Feature Request.
By the way it's a weak start. A week start is that employed by people on auto-vacation.
it would certainly change some of the starting moves. Not as good to leave builds etc, but you're still playing catch up. Basically you're starting with 2 pieces captured, if that wasn't bad then why capture?
The only problem with that argument is that you are still paying here and not elsewhere. iyt was so bad I stopped paying them and came here. If you find a site that is as good as this AND has autopass you could let us know and maybe that would have an effect.
I would have to say a suggestion to change the rules does belong here as a feature request. I would also like a list of captured pieces, though I don't think the rank should be known if it wasn't discovered during the game (it could just be blank).
How about fixing the bug in backgammon that allows only one die to be used when it is possible to use both. Perhaps that could be part of the Pro Backgammon release?
I suggest try going to a higher resolution and increase the text size. You do that by clicking "view" then "text size" in the toolbar (in case you didn't know).
It seems to be popular to sign up twice and deliberately lose a bunch of games with one in order to pump up your rating. I suggest we delete all these users as we find them.
Here are 2 examples:
babareza = amirh
CurbYourEnthus = gamer07
Even if they are different people they are setting up the games. :)
Playing for free as a pawn can serve that purpose. I was just trying to say that charity dollars could be better spent.
Having said that feel free to pay for whoever you want, more players is good.
The point is that the game would force the opening. I believe it is to eliminate the advantage (like pente). Therefore the rating would work out better as well.
How about updating the S-B scores while the tournament is running. I know they are meaningless early, but as the tournament progresses it becomes interesting.
but you know anyway in some cases, so why make us track it in the notes? Once again I think marking the pieces is best if possible (same as notes but in a better place), though may not be easy to implement