tonyh:There's a lot to be said for single point matches. It's an opportunity to practice pure checker play. It can be a lot of fun, too, when you can take chances you would not take if gammons and cubes were in play.
In discussions of this subject, I find it useful to point out that cubeless games come up in a majority of matches even when the cube is in play. For example, there is no cube in the Crawford game, and gammons are significant only against the leader. Post-Crawford games are almost cubeless as well, since the cube is more or less automatic. The clearest case is when the players are tied at 1-away: there you are in a pure cubeless situation.
So you could say that you don't need to play one-pointers in order to have the opportunity to play cubeless; or you could say that one-pointers give you a chance to practice pure checker play, which will come in handy in those 1-away, 1-away situations.
As is so often the case, it's a matter of personal preference.
(peida) Kui oled huvitatud selle turniiri edukusest, millel mängid, siis võid oma vastastega arutleda selle turniiri vestlusgrupis. (HelenaTanein) (näita kõiki vihjeid)