Kasutajanimi: Salasõna:
Uue kasutaja registreerimine
Tsensor: rod03801 
 Feature requests

Do you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board!
If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board.

For further information about Feature Requests, please visit this link on the Brainking.Info site : http://brainking.info/archives/20-About-feature-requests.html


Sõnumeid ühel lehel:
Vestlusringide loetelu
Sa ei tohi sellesse vestlusringi kirjutada. Madalaim lubatud liikmelisustase sellesse vestlusringi kirjutamiseks on Ajuratsu.
Režiim: Igaüks võib postitada
Otsi sõnumite hulgas:  

18. juuli 2006, 05:12:46
Orlandu 
Teema: Added Rule for Anti-Chess
En-passent is in effect in Anti-ches but it is not in the game rules...

18. juuli 2006, 05:42:30
Orlandu 
Teema: Re: Added Rule for Anti-Chess
Marfitalu: Alot of Chess players That I have played do not know of the rule for En passent...

18. juuli 2006, 05:45:04
mctrivia 
Teema: Re: Added Rule for Anti-Chess
Daniel Snyder: i got caugt once thinking it wasn't there but as Marfitalu pointed out the rules don't exclude it I just thought they did. I won't forget again

18. juuli 2006, 11:31:16
*BOB*on*Bush* 
Teema: Re: Added Rule for Anti-Chess
Daniel Snyder: i won a $20 bet on the rule once- when i took a pawn en passant and was told i couldn't do it! i took the move back but we made the bet- left it at the bar and the next day i went to the library made a copy- went to bar and collected the $40;]

18. juuli 2006, 15:28:09
grenv 
Teema: Re: Added Rule for Anti-Chess
Daniel Snyder: Just because people are ignorant of the rule, doesn't mean that the rule doesn't exist. Frankly I'm astounded that someone who plays the game can NOT know the rule. How come???

18. juuli 2006, 15:40:09
gambler104 
Teema: Re: Added Rule for Anti-Chess
grenv: I completely agree. If you play a game, you should know all the rules no matter how recent or old they are.

18. juuli 2006, 15:44:33
grenv 
Teema: Re: Added Rule for Anti-Chess
Marfitalu: The rule has been in effect for more then 500 years, does anyone claim to have played prior to that??

It was introduced at about the same time as the 2 square pawn move to combat the effect of evading the enemy pawn too easily. Other rules introduced at about the same time:
Castling.
Unlimited Queen and Bishop moves.

There aren't that many rules really, it shouldn't be hard to learn them!! I did when I was about 6.

18. juuli 2006, 16:07:27
coan.net 
Teema: Re: Added Rule for Anti-Chess


Please take this discussion over to http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=6 (The Chess 8x8 board).

Thanks

19. juuli 2006, 16:21:31
*BOB*on*Bush* 
Teema: Re: Added Rule for Anti-Chess
Marfitalu: Apparently you know the rules for Chess but not for the copyright.</>

pray tell- exactly what copyright rules did i break;?]

20. juuli 2006, 12:06:45
*BOB*on*Bush* 
Teema: Re: Copyrighting "En Passant"
this started as an innocent aside to the en passant rule

*BOB*on*Bush*: i won a $20 bet on the rule once- when i took a pawn en passant and was told i couldn't do it! i took the move back but we made the bet- left it at the bar and the next day i went to the library made a copy- went to bar and collected the $40;]

Marfitalu: Apparently you know the rules for Chess but not for the copyright.

you're dissing me- but i'm cool;]

*BOB*on*Bush*: pray tell- exactly what copyright rules did i break;?]

Marfitalu: Maybe the copy of the book ?

*BOB*on*Bush*: Maybe I didn’t copy the entire book-Maybe I copied ONE page [de minims copying (copying a small amount) is not copyright infringement;]
Maybe it was for educational purposes;]
Maybe I gave the author credit.
Maybe I didn’t publish it, nor call it my own creative work.
Maybe it was not creative work.
Maybe it was public domain!
Marfitalu: “Enpassant rule appeared at the begining of the Renaissance”

Maybe you don’t know what ‘exactly’ means.
exactly: In an exact manner; accurately.

You put yourself out as an authority on copyright infringement- while inferring I am ignorant…

So one more time- with emphasis- enlighten me!
pray tell- exactly what copyright rules did i break;?]

20. juuli 2006, 12:13:29
Walter Montego 
Teema: Re: Copyrighting "En Passant"
Walter Montego toimetatud (20. juuli 2006, 12:15:17)
*BOB*on*Bush*: Isn't it called "in passing" in English? No other move in Chess is spoken of in French when speaking English. I keep a copy of the rules to regular Chess with my Chess set. For some reason this rule about a Pawn capturing a Pawn in passing is one a lot of casual Chess players and bar patrons do not know. The other rule that seems to come up for disagreement often is promoting a Pawn to a Queen when you still have your original Queen on the table. Yes, you can have two Queens at one time in regular Chess.

20. juuli 2006, 12:23:21
tonyh 
Teema: Re: Copyrighting "En Passant"
Walter Montego: I know it's not French - but you have 'zugswang' and 'swischenzug'!!

2. august 2006, 02:06:30
$ONE$ 
Teema: Re: Copyrighting "En Passant"
Walter Montego: i heard "en garde" in chess tournaments decades ago... [queen check]

2. august 2006, 10:43:32
FilsdeTycho 
Teema: Re: Copyrighting "En Passant"
FilsdeTycho toimetatud (2. august 2006, 10:44:10)
$ONE$: en passant is right (and used in FIDE rules). "En garde" is for musketeers before fighting (which is also appropriate for chess duels!). Tycho lost his nose in a duel!

2. august 2006, 21:49:21
$ONE$ 
Teema: Re: Copyrighting "En Passant"
Tycho: LOL-
why did 'musketeers' fight with swords ;?] Touché!

20. juuli 2006, 15:43:50
grenv 
Teema: Re: Copyrighting "En Passant"
*BOB*on*Bush*: lighten up, it was a joke.

Walter, it's en passant in english as well, kind of like tete a tete or piece de resistance (Fr Sp?)

Kuupäev ja kellaaeg
Sisselogitud sõbrad
Lemmik-vestlusgrupid
Sõpruskonnad
Päeva vihje
Autoriõigus © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, kõik õigused kaitstud.
Tagasi algusse