User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Knight.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264   > >>
27. January 2007, 15:35:06
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
Fencer: Just curious about the enforcement, it doesnt seem possible?

27. January 2007, 15:28:46
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
plaintiger: No, it's not transferable.

27. January 2007, 15:23:29
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
plaintiger: I dont see any way for Fencer to prove (with any absolute certainty) if this has been done, nor should he care, really, since he got paid for someone to have all of the benefits of a brain rook FOREVER! It does not say for life, but forever, so it has to be transferable, since non of us can live forever!

27. January 2007, 14:06:08
King Reza 
Subject: Re:
plaintiger:Ask Fencer.  He's the only one who can give you the 'facts,' and not 'guesses.'

27. January 2007, 14:02:14
plaintiger 
can anyone tell me the facts - no guesses nor opinions, please; those are of no interest nor use to me - but rather the facts - about whether a black rook membership may be transferred - whether given or sold or whatever - to a person other than the original owner?

thank you...

27. January 2007, 09:54:54
joshi tm 
Subject: Re: Frog Finder
redfrog: No you must find them. If you shoot (and kill) them, that's costly.

27. January 2007, 07:55:18
redfrog 
Subject: Re: Frog Finder
emmett: thank you - ill spread the word about emmett the benevolent - all of frogdom shall befriend you when you have need!!

27. January 2007, 07:52:49
Foxy Lady 
Subject: Re: Frog Finder
redfrog:

27. January 2007, 07:47:44
goodbyebking 
Subject: Re: Frog Finder
redfrog: That's pretty funny, redfrog. I'll refrain from playing it in deference to your ampheelings.

27. January 2007, 07:45:43
redfrog 
Subject: Frog Finder
Sooooo - this new game - been reading the rules - and frankly im disturbed - im trying to read the mind of fencer here and i cant for the life of me determine what i did to upset him so much - i dont see any games where little men with swords get points for killing eachother - why in the name of all thats good and pure - must we kill the little redfrogs???

26. January 2007, 23:53:01
Bernice 
Subject: MAD MONKEY???
are you still missing turns in triple dice?? I have had it happen twicce this morning ...makes it hard dont it??

26. January 2007, 21:47:18
Kili 
Subject: Re: Frog Finder
BIG BAD WOLF: Ok, thanks. I think the sentece is a little confused.

26. January 2007, 21:40:10
coan.net 
Subject: Re: Frog Finder
Matarilevich: Just for finding all the opponents frogs, you get 2 points. On top to the 2 points, you get 1 point for each frog your opponent did not find.

26. January 2007, 21:35:10
Kili 
Subject: Frog Finder
Modified by Kili (26. January 2007, 21:35:45)
Rules say: "The other player gets a bonus of 2 points and 1 point for each own frog which was not found by the opponent."
I don´t understand this. ¿¿2? or ¿1? points?

26. January 2007, 13:33:41
ScrambledEggs 
Subject: Re:
MadMonkey: guess it got lost in cyberspace!!!!

26. January 2007, 13:30:57
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re:
Fencer: Ahhhh yes, but you know what these pesky little bugs are like. They have a nasty one on Star Trek - Voyager at the moment(Sky 2 now), and there computer aint working at all LOL

26. January 2007, 13:26:41
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
MadMonkey: Should I check it twice?
Don't worry about it.

26. January 2007, 13:25:13
MadMonkey 
Dont know if you want to check this Fencer, but this is the reason i asked for that Feature.
My Ludo Captain "Snoopy", just posted a result on the Madhouse board that she JUST got in a message.
Now what i find odd is i already have that result on my list at home from about 2 weeks ago when i was going through results.
So, what happened in between LOL

26. January 2007, 13:22:32
MadMonkey 
Dont know if you want to check this Fencer, but this is the reason i asked for that Feature.
My Ludo Captain "Snoopy", just posted a result on the Madhouse board that she JUST got in a message.
Now what i find odd is i already have that result on my list at home from about 2 weeks ago when i was going through results.
So, what happened in between LOL

26. January 2007, 09:42:06
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Not deleted tournaments?
AbigailII: Never get deleted. At least at this moment.

26. January 2007, 09:37:09
AbigailII 
Subject: Not deleted tournaments?
If I go to the tournaments page, the first 9 tournaments are way past their sign-up deadline; the first tournament is even 300 days past the sign up deadline. They all seem to be tournaments that require a Brains entry fee. Is this a bug? Or do tournaments with entry fees never get deleted?

26. January 2007, 07:37:05
Bernice 
sorry....it was me with the phantom post...sorry

25. January 2007, 22:37:36
Bernice 
Subject: no 2nd roll
I have noticed the same thing but AT THE SAME time have noticed that what the dice say are the dice that I need...for instance:- a full house is what I need and the dice come up with a full house...no options to roll the dice....to me it hasnt been a problem thus far :)

25. January 2007, 21:53:51
Adaptable Ali 
Subject: Re:
Rose: Yes it only happened to me today, very strange. I will put same message on computer board. Thanks . oh and my smilies have stopped working too *bangs head on wall* lol

25. January 2007, 21:52:32
Rose 
Subject: Re:
mybirthdaysoon: I had that a few months back. One day it just happened on me, in Firefox.. i had to uninstall FF then install the latest version.. even that didnt always work so I switched to seamonkey.. problem solved then.. Since then I have a completely new system and so far, knock on wood, my FF hasnt had that problem.
So I'm no help.. might get some insite on the Computer board tho as this doesnt pertain to the site structure etc.

25. January 2007, 21:49:30
Adaptable Ali 
Modified by Adaptable Ali (25. January 2007, 21:49:52)
Can somebody help me. When I switch to Rich Text Editor there is no message box to type into, does anybody know the cause of this and how i can rectify it. Thank you

25. January 2007, 18:43:10
coan.net 
Subject: Re: Frog Finder!
joshi tm: I posted a quick overview on the frog finder discussion board: http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=132

25. January 2007, 18:42:51
pauloaguia 
Subject: Re: Frog Finder!
joshi tm: I'm trying to find out too, but nobody accepts my invitations. But I've been told it's a bit like Minesweeper ;)

25. January 2007, 18:37:32
joshi tm 
Subject: Frog Finder!
Help, how does this game work?

25. January 2007, 16:58:04
AbigailII 
Subject: Re: Actions if you cannot make a legal move.
Modified by AbigailII (25. January 2007, 16:58:53)

25. January 2007, 16:47:39
Jason 
Subject: Re: Actions if you cannot make a legal move.
AbigailII: I have never played it with 3 pieces , five is the lowest amount of pieces i have played with .

25. January 2007, 16:28:40
AbigailII 
Subject: Re: Actions if you cannot make a legal move.
MadMonkey: In Nine Men's Morris you also lose if you cannot make a move.

BTW, I think that Nine Men's Morris would make a nice addition to BrainKing. It's an old game with proven playability, with simple rules (making it easier to program than say, chess), and it has several variants (with three, six and twelve men; Wikipedia even mentions variants with 5, 7 and 11 men).

25. January 2007, 15:40:21
nabla 
Subject: Re: Actions if you cannot make a legal move.
MadMonkey: If I am not mistaken, in some Mancala variants, when you have no move you win all marbles still on board. I don't especially like such rules (as I don't especially like the stalemate rule in chess) but they do exist.

25. January 2007, 13:33:56
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re: Actions if you cannot make a legal move.
Fencer: I don't like them, because i have never played or heard of the game, and still think they are crazy rules, but there you go, i accept it..........and as you say dont have to play it, like the broke dice game

25. January 2007, 13:29:32
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Actions if you cannot make a legal move.
MadMonkey: "Often" is not an accurate word. Furthermore, rule adjustments are done mostly to games invented by BrainKing users. Konane is a game created a long time ago and there is no point to change its rules now, only because you don't like them.

25. January 2007, 13:27:18
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re: Actions if you cannot make a legal move.
Fencer: Quite right, but as rules here often change on new games(as has been proved lately), i just which to know what is right.

And has also been proved unless someone says something, which is normally only a handful of us here, nothing ever changes

And a question on that Fencer, what is the percentage of players (nearly 40,000, alot dead agreed) actually do write on the board ????????

25. January 2007, 13:26:47
AbigailII 
Subject: Re: Actions if you cannot make a legal move.
MadMonkey: Hey, if you'd get a draw whenever you did hard work, I would never lose a game!

Beside Backgammon, you also have Ludo with passes. And Go where the player can decide himself whether he passes or not.

25. January 2007, 13:21:06
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Actions if you cannot make a legal move.
MadMonkey: That's the rules of the game. Accept it or don't play it.

25. January 2007, 13:19:30
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re: Actions if you cannot make a legal move.
Modified by MadMonkey (25. January 2007, 13:20:27)
AbigailII: Agreed, but does not mean its the right rules to use.
It was discussed when Ataxx first came here, why cant we have a pass as in Backgammon ?
Why does Backgammon have to be the only game to have a Pass ?
I just think that if a player has done alot of the hard work, WHY should they lose ? A draw should be the worst they get - IMHO

25. January 2007, 13:03:37
AbigailII 
Subject: Re: Actions if you cannot make a legal move.
MadMonkey: Losing when you have no legal move available is quite normal for Checkers variants. In fact, you lose in Checkers itself as well if you cannot move. You also lose in Anti-Chess, Chinese Chess, Espionage, and Tablut if you have no legal move available. In the gammon variants, you pass. In Ataxx, a stalemate isn't always draw - a stalemate ends the game and the one with the most points wins. It's only a draw if both sides have the same number of points.

25. January 2007, 12:33:34
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re:
Fencer: I have tried clearing the cache lots of times & refreshing, but it still happens. So what is causing it i am happy to try it

and while i am here (morning by the way) is Hawaiian Checkers the only game in the world where the person winning loses if a player can not move.

Chess, stalemate = Draw
Ataxx, stalemate = Draw
Hawaiian Checkers, stalemate = person with least points wins

25. January 2007, 08:05:27
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
MadMonkey: You have been given many advices by several persons on this board. Since it's been proven that nothing is wrong on BrainKing side, the rest is up to you.

25. January 2007, 02:09:35
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re:
Pedro Martínez: Twice more in the last hour, only one roll at Dice. I tried both times reloading page, but no difference

24. January 2007, 18:16:56
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
Pedro Martínez: ahhhhh!!!! Now you tell me!!!! I just lost a game by 2 points because I made my play with only one roll! The other game, I took my turn anyway, but the outcome wasn't in jeopardy.

24. January 2007, 17:57:03
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re:
Czuch Czuckers: It has happened to me too, Chuck - I just reloaded the page and everything was just fine again...:)

24. January 2007, 17:35:22
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re:
Czuch Czuckers: I agree Czuch as i said when you first mentioned it, it has happened to me several times and also to at least 2 other players i know of.

BBW: Think we need to think of a better way to roll the dice. Have 2 buttons or something, Roll-1, Roll-2, simple

24. January 2007, 17:34:57
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: If you do that, nothing will happen.

24. January 2007, 17:32:26
coan.net 
Subject: Re:
Fencer: I have not checked myself, but does the system allow you to click "roll dice" if you have no dice chosen?

If so - put a block - that way if someone does double click, the second click would be with no dice marked, and should not count as a roll.

24. January 2007, 17:29:38
pauloaguia 
Subject: Re:
Fencer: It's simple to avoid really - just add a variable to the request with the roll number or something like that. If that move has already been done, then no need to roll the dice again.

24. January 2007, 17:21:15
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
pauloaguia: That's a good point. I know that some people make doubleclicks instead of normal clicks and, of course, the server takes them as two consequent requests.

<< <   255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top