User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Knight.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267   > >>
20. January 2007, 02:40:12
Adaptable Ali 
If my opponent resignd this game, how could he be the winner.


From: [zimmermann, Germany, Brain Rook, Male] zimmermann (show this user messages) - viewing game Backgammon Race (Evásek vs. zimmermann)
Date and time: 20. January 2007, 01:33:52
Subject: Your opponent resigned the game (Backgammon) (show game) [Germany, 426 players]
(news)


zimmermann is the winner.

zimmermann: old BKR = 2214, new BKR = 2221 (+7)
mybirthdaysoon: old BKR = 2165, new BKR = 2158 (-7)

Game type: Backgammon
Tournament: Do them all 5 game match

20. January 2007, 00:50:03
Adaptable Ali 
Subject: Re: MR KING MAN
MizE: No, i have never come across him, but regardless of that. Thank you and my thoughts are with his family.

20. January 2007, 00:47:53
MizE 
Subject: MR KING MAN
I don't know if any of you have played a game with MR KING MAN on here at all, but I would like to inform everyone that he has since passed away. He died on Thanksgiving, at rougly 4:30PM.

20. January 2007, 00:04:40
danheg 
Subject: Re: WOW!!!
Andersp: Until now.

19. January 2007, 15:01:25
Andersp 
Subject: WOW!!!
32 new messages...and all of them on topic!!!!

19. January 2007, 14:59:52
Czuch 
Subject: Re: "play later"
pauloaguia: My default is currently set to show the next game with the shortest amount of time left to make a move. But when I use the play later option, then that game should not be included anymore, should it?

19. January 2007, 14:45:05
pauloaguia 
Subject: Re: "play later"
Czuch Czuckers: That I don't know. Maybe it has something to do with how your next game is calculated (should it be of the same type and you have no more games of that type, for instance?) or on your default option when submiting a move (if your default is "go to the main page" rather than "goto next game", for instance).
But I'm just guessing now, of course. Better wait for an answer from Fencer if you can't figure it out...

19. January 2007, 14:40:37
Czuch 
Subject: Re: "play later"
pauloaguia: Okay then why , when I use the play later option, am I taken to the main screen when I have many other games waiting for a move? Also when I do go back to another game, the "play later" game doesnt pop up until after the second time?

19. January 2007, 14:35:25
pauloaguia 
Subject: Re: "play later"
Czuch Czuckers: There is currently one game that I am using the play later option, when I do this I am taken back to my main screen. Then that was your last game. Usually it should take you to the next game on your play list.
Shouldnt that game not pop up again until I have either gone to the main page to click it or until it is the only game left where it is my turn? Like you said, you went to the main page right after clicking the "Play Later" button. So the games on hold were reset at that point.


I was only complaining about it not being persistent for the time frame I wanted. It seems like if I don't access the site for more than 30min, the games I choose to play later are also reset, and they'll show all up again.
But even if it's just a second after, whenever you go by the main page, they're always back, that's how it's supposed to work.

19. January 2007, 14:27:31
Czuch 
Subject: "play later"
I am not sure what the function of this is supposed to be, I read something the other day about it from Fencer, and it sounded like it should work better than it currently is. There is currently one game that I am using the play later option, when I do this I am taken back to my main screen. I then proceed to play the next game below this game (as it is still on the top of my list).... everything so far seems okay... then after I make my next move I am given still another game to move to next... still okay, but after that next move then the game I want to play later comes up again!!!! This is where it seems to be not okay?


Is this the way it is meant to work? Shouldnt that game not pop up again until I have either gone to the main page to click it or until it is the only game left where it is my turn?

19. January 2007, 12:51:37
Hrqls 
Subject: Re:
Gabriel Almeida: i sent chuck and rose a private message
my opinion is that personal matters between persons should be handled in private messages in the first place

now before everyone starts to interfere and we get 2 groups fighting (and a 3rd group watching, and a 4th group running away ;))

lets finish this 'discussion' with this post and if anyone really wants to say something else about this please send it to me in a private message (click on the envelop next to my name)

19. January 2007, 12:01:05
Gabriel Almeida 
Subject: Re:
Modified by Gabriel Almeida (19. January 2007, 12:14:34)

Rose: I love mod's! In special, global mod's...


The only "nasty thing" I can read here is Rose calling Czuch Czuckers of "ignorant"... I believe I will be silenced, but that's my opinion.


19. January 2007, 05:56:34
joshi tm 
Subject: Re: ludo
emmett: I think this was also the situation in Holland yesterday.

19. January 2007, 04:21:25
nightmagic 
Subject: Re:
Jason: catch u in a game sometime, don't follow boards that much, to much going on,lol

19. January 2007, 04:17:21
Jason 
Subject: Re:
nightmagic:

19. January 2007, 04:15:41
nightmagic 
Subject: Re:
Jason: don't worry, i was being funny here, lol, someone has to be.this is to be fun and games and so many get up set at others instead of having fun in the games.

19. January 2007, 04:10:51
nightmagic 
Subject: Re:
Jason: u r cute

19. January 2007, 04:09:29
nightmagic 
Subject: why does it matter ??
if one is interviewed, how long it takes? If 1 is picked for interview i think its up to them as they are the one answering. ... as some take forever to play a game and a year down the road you find you win or lose. It's there time till it comes to you.

19. January 2007, 04:05:15
Jason 

19. January 2007, 03:58:04
nightmagic 
Subject: the fuss over one's interview
not that i read them but the fight before is interesting. who like's who?who is rude or not, good point's to check out, all can and will be when attacted...

19. January 2007, 03:12:07
srnity 
Subject: Re:Your Interview.....
Czuch Czuckers: So your saying that maybe you don't want it as part of your Eulogy (sp) someday? Can't say I blame you

19. January 2007, 03:02:16
Czuch 
Subject: Re:Your Interview.....
srnity: LOL, I was thinking the exact same thing! Its tough to publish something that cant be edited and will remain for view long after i am gone! But I finally just said the heck with it, you get what you get and I live with the consequences!

19. January 2007, 02:59:29
srnity 
Subject: Re:Your Interview.....
Czuch Czuckers: Do they let you "edit" after the fact? Wouldn't that be great, you could just change your answers as people pm'd you

19. January 2007, 02:56:54
Czuch 
Subject: Re:Your Interview.....
srnity: Thanks, but I sent it in a bit ago, didnt want to mess things up here ya know.... I hope Reza does a quick spell check and sentence structure check etc for me though ;)

19. January 2007, 02:51:20
srnity 
Subject: Re:Your Interview.....
Czuch Czuckers: I'm looking forward to reading it, but no rush.....sometimes people hurry things that just shouldn't be rushed, but savored, after all, how often does that ten minutes of fame come around? P.S. I think your pic frazzles people - I finally got used to it

19. January 2007, 02:06:56
goodbyebking 
Subject: ludo

19. January 2007, 01:47:40
Adaptable Ali 
gawd, that was bad grammar lol

19. January 2007, 01:45:37
Adaptable Ali 
Please can we get back to what this board is for. Thank you

19. January 2007, 01:44:50
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
jessica: i will not remove my comment because i stand by it.


So it is okay for you to be hurtful because its something you stand by, but its not okay for me????

19. January 2007, 01:34:40
jessica 
Subject: Re:
Czuch Czuckers: you just proved my point. by being rude to someone who offends you, you loose your dignity and self-respect. i was not being cruel, hurtful, or hateful. i will not remove my comment because i stand by it. i will stand up for anyone that you are rude to uneccesarily like you were to rose and big bad wolf.you cannot just expect everyone to agree to whatever you say and not say anything if your comments are rude and uncalled for as they were with the afore mentioned people.

19. January 2007, 01:30:20
Jason 
Subject: Re:

19. January 2007, 01:19:11
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
jessica: being rude to someone who offends me is my motto.... but telling me I have no dignity or self respect, now that is down right cruel and hurtful, and totally baseless, i would ask that hateful comment about me be removed please.

19. January 2007, 01:14:31
jessica 
Subject: Re:
Czuch Czuckers: i didn't say you didn't have the right to feel offended but have some dignity and self-respect about how you answer and responde to people because you come off rude and defensive when you explain your position.

19. January 2007, 01:05:29
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
jessica: Sorry to offend you, but I was offended by Roses comment as well, but I guess only other people are allowed to feel offended?

19. January 2007, 01:03:49
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
Rose: Lets not get soo ignorant on a public board.

What does that mean? How was I getting "ignorant"?


BTW, it doesnt matter if you want one or not, its not up to you, people dont ask for themselves to be interviewed, other people vote who they want to hear about!

Also, how was it not a comment about me, when the conversation was about how I hadnt completed my interview yet?


If you can answer my questions, maybe I will remove my ignorant comments, if I can figure out what they are!

19. January 2007, 01:02:54
jessica 
Subject: Re:
Czuch Czuckers: that's the second time i have read posts on here where you've gone off on someone. if you can't post a message in a civil tone, don't post anything. it offends the person you're talking about and others who read them.

19. January 2007, 00:52:12
Rose 
Subject: Re:
Czuch Czuckers: Lets not get soo ignorant on a public board. It wasnt a statement at you.. it was a general statement to those that run the interviews..

FYI. I never had an interview NOR want one.

I'll ask you to remove your nasty sentence please.

19. January 2007, 00:50:19
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
Modified by Czuch (19. January 2007, 01:11:21)
Rose: Are you trying to start/cause problems again????

Maybe you want to make some arbitrary amount of time that is acceptable to you? How are "things being held up"??? How is time being wasted???/

...Just a thought... why dont you mind your own business??

18. January 2007, 22:27:01
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re:
Rose: 9 months...I wanted it to be like a newborn baby...

18. January 2007, 22:25:37
Rose 
Subject: Re:
Pedro Martínez: ohhh did you? LOL How long did it take you?

18. January 2007, 22:14:55
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re:
Rose: No one has taken this long to return the questions before.


18. January 2007, 21:23:52
Rose 
Maybe instead of wasting so much time if a person has no desire to be interviewed or take the time to participate they tell people in advance so there isnt a 3 months waiting period after they are sent the questions.

Just a thought... No one has taken this long to return the questions before.. It just holds every thing up

18. January 2007, 21:11:55
King Reza 
Subject: Re: Play later
Tuesday:  So my Farsi-based joke didn't work!  I meant it was more going (escaping) than coming (to be posted on the site)!

18. January 2007, 21:08:13
Czuch 
Subject: Re: Play later
Tuesday: Sure to make sure that nobody is lying....

18. January 2007, 21:07:44
King Reza 
Subject: Re: Play later
Tuesday:Actually there are a few steps before that!  First Czuch has to finish answering them, NOT DONE.
Then he'll have to send them to me, NOT DONE.  After it I'll have to read it and possibly arrange the questions in a better order since I just sent them to Czuch unarranged, NOT DONE.  And finally I'll send them to Fencer, NOT DONE. 

18. January 2007, 21:02:54
King Reza 
Subject: Re: Play later
Tuesday:

<< <   258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top