User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Knight.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269   > >>
15. January 2007, 22:51:02
Pbarb2 
Subject: Re: Can someone help me?
BIG BAD WOLF:
I knew it was to good to be true.LOL I want to use the board for something else. So guess I will have to keep the messages on and continue with the new subject. I can't delete all of them.
To many on there for that. Thanks for answering my question.
BARB

15. January 2007, 22:10:18
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
nivabef: I dont like playing in games or tournaments that will last for decades...

15. January 2007, 21:57:35
nivabef 
Subject: Re:
Czuch Czuckers: What's the point of resigning? Why not just play? Unless you were a pawn, how would it hurt?

15. January 2007, 20:51:28
Czuch 
At least, shouldnt there be some way to resign the games in one turn each? As it is cirrently, I only lose 3 points to resign a game. At that rate it can take me a couple of months just to resign my way out of the tournament!

15. January 2007, 20:51:01
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Tournaments break the statistic too
Czuch Czuckers: Because I have allowed it, that's why.

15. January 2007, 20:49:24
Czuch 
Subject: Re: Tournaments break the statistic too
Fencer: Nothing is impossible.... but thanks for your quick response!

I am curious why the tournament was allowed to proceed after the rules have changed?

15. January 2007, 20:47:31
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Tournaments break the statistic too
Czuch Czuckers: Impossible.

15. January 2007, 20:42:53
Czuch 
Subject: Re: Tournaments break the statistic too
joshi tm: I signed up for this 21 point per game tournament when the rules allowed for the potential to get 21 or more points in one game. Once the rules of this game changed, the tournament should have been deleted and the started over. Its not fair when the parameters of the game change after someone signs up for it!

I want to get out of this tournament without losing my BKR for this game. Please fencer help me!?!?!?!?!

15. January 2007, 20:16:32
Gabriel Almeida 
Subject: Re: Tournaments break the statistic too
joshi tm: Well... it's the biggest 21-point cubed cloning Backgammon tourney, for sure!

15. January 2007, 20:10:34
joshi tm 
Subject: Tournaments break the statistic too
Play Cloning Gammon for a prize. , this tourney caused Cloning Backgammon to have more than 2500 games running! Is this also the biggest 21-point cubed Gammon tournament?

15. January 2007, 19:31:09
coan.net 
Subject: Re: Can someone help me?
Pbarb2: You can't "delete" boards - but you can do what you said (change name of board to "." - so most will not find it.

To delete all messages, either click delete on all messages, Ask Fencer to do it for you, or probable the best - click "Edit" and change the read access to "Brain King" - that way not even you can see the messages in the board (so it looks like everything is gone)

Then just post in the description of the board "This board is closed." or something like that.

15. January 2007, 19:20:35
Czuch 
Subject: Re: Can someone help me?
Pbarb2: Vikings posted that....

15. January 2007, 19:18:16
Pbarb2 
Subject: Can someone help me?
Getting rid of fellowship Board.
Go into the edit for that board and change the name to a period, then change who can read and post to king, all that will be left is a " . " that most people will never find and if they do they cannot go to the page anyway, but you know it is there in case you want to start it up again someday
I saved this in my notebook. I don't know where I got it.
I want to get rid of two boards and the messages. Where do you put king if that is what we are to do? On that part on who can read the board it has choices..no place to write anything.
Thanks for any help.

15. January 2007, 17:28:09
pauloaguia 
Subject: Re:
Rose: Close enough. Except that it's not the act of posting that counts but the act of opening the board page. You don't even have to post to be counted as a visitor, just open that page.
So, if someone posts a post just before midnight (server time), and then 100 people go there to read it the next day, it may become one of the most popular boards, even if no messages are posted for that whole day...

15. January 2007, 17:16:20
Dolittle 
Subject: Re:
Rose: Ok

15. January 2007, 17:09:35
Rose 
Subject: Re:
Dolittle: you cant.. thats not what they mean hun
they mean each person from the FS can only post once a day to make it count no matter how many times a day they post in that FS

15. January 2007, 17:09:35
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
Dolittle: You can go there but you cannot read messages.

15. January 2007, 17:08:35
Dolittle 
Subject: Re:
pauloaguia:I am so confused..I thought if you are not a member of said fellowship, you can't go there and read messages.

15. January 2007, 16:56:43
pauloaguia 
Subject: Re:
Dolittle: When you go to see the messages on a board you are counted as a visitor. For the rest of that day you are not counted again for that board, even if you keep going there to see new messages.
What counts is the number of different visitors to the board (readers), not the number of posters.

15. January 2007, 16:54:14
Dolittle 
Subject: Re:
Fencer:Unique visitors?

15. January 2007, 16:35:42
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Black Rooks
Andersp: Of course, I have already started to work on it. It doesn't mean it would be finished immediately, there are many other things which must be done as well.

15. January 2007, 16:25:52
Andersp 
Subject: Re: Black Rooks
Fencer: Any idea when you are back home?

"Andersp: Yes sir, as you wish sir, just when I am back at home sir. And thanks. "

15. January 2007, 09:51:38
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
Dolittle: The number of messages is irrelevant. Only unique visitors count.

15. January 2007, 09:47:57
Hrqls 
Subject: Re:
Dolittle: only 1 message per unique id per day will count

so if i post 3 messages on there, and you 4, then we will only add 2 to the total count for the visited boards list

(i think)

15. January 2007, 09:46:35
Hrqls 
Subject: Re: cant play 20 games
deadbunnysRfun: did you try to start 1 new game or a match consisting of more than 1 game ? or did you try to join a tournament ?
are you in a pond ?

15. January 2007, 09:44:05
Hrqls 
Subject: Re:
Czuch Czuckers: which rankings page do you mean ? when i go to the ratings page i can see cheversi at the bottom of the chess game types

15. January 2007, 08:49:20
Adaptable Ali 
Subject: Re:
Dolittle:I have noticed as well, that you dont even have to leave a post in a
fellowship, even if it just gets looked at, that counts too .

15. January 2007, 07:47:49
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
joshi tm:      Thank You  ;)

15. January 2007, 07:46:55
joshi tm 
Subject: Re:
Gr☺uch☺: (*)The player who finishes at least 4 rated games of one kind (everybody who defines a new game can specify whether the game will be "rated" - the result will be calculated for BKR - or not), earns "provisional BKR" displayed by italic font (e.g. 1870). After finishing 25 rated games of one kind the provisional BKR changes to "established BKR" and is displayed by normal font (e.g. 1853). If you complete more games, your BKR is more accurate because is based on more results.

15. January 2007, 07:45:45
Papa Zoom 
How many finished games does it take to get an "official" rating?  ;)

15. January 2007, 02:46:48
heavenlyemma 
Subject: Re:
Dolittle: Beats me then lol

15. January 2007, 02:32:58
Dolittle 
Subject: Re:
heavenlyemma: I know it does but hasn't in a while.

15. January 2007, 02:16:04
heavenlyemma 
Subject: Re:
Dolittle: It does make the top 30 just doesn't stay there long.

15. January 2007, 01:44:48
Dolittle 
Wonder why Oldies but Goodies never makes the top visited boards list? I know there were 11 messages on it today.

14. January 2007, 23:45:04
Jason 
Subject: Re:
Modified by Jason (14. January 2007, 23:46:22)
deadbunnysRfun: you have two running tournaments maybe that is why you can only have 19 games , not sure though

14. January 2007, 22:05:05
joshi tm 
Subject: Statistics
It would be great if you could split to first page of the Statistics page by head game types (e.g Chess, BG, or other)

14. January 2007, 21:02:05
Dead 
not that i can find ive been looken through all that stuff to try and figure it out

14. January 2007, 20:52:27
Adaptable Ali 
Subject: Re: cant play 20 games
deadbunnysRfun: Have u signed to a tournament that is waiting to start?

14. January 2007, 20:47:30
Dead 
Subject: cant play 20 games
does any one have an explination to why i can only play 19 games at a time i have 19 games running no invitations and im not in any stairs but when i try to start a new game it wont let me couse it says i am full but the main page says im playing 19 with one open spot?????????????????

14. January 2007, 20:30:19
Czuch 
Do the rankings of a new game get put up automatically after so many games or whatever? i noticed that chevresi doesnt show any?

14. January 2007, 19:56:30
joshi tm 
Subject: Re: Dice Chess
MadMonkey: You could aslo turn the things around in

Ambigious Dice Chess...

Whats that? Each time, mark a field where to play, but you can only mark an ambigious field ( where 2 or more pieces can go), then randomize which piece to go.

14. January 2007, 12:07:29
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re: Dice Chess
Modified by MadMonkey (14. January 2007, 12:09:07)
Hieronymus: The idea of a new variant has been proved with Assimilation (was called Ataxx when released). When the Ataxx rule of a knight move was introduced Fencer released a new version called Ataxx, and the old version of Ataxx was called Assimilation.

As i mentioned, most people prefer the Assimilation version, so even by introducing the proper rules to a game like Ataxx, does not mean people will prefer that version, even if it is the proper one.
The games of Dice Chess is still new, so its a good time to do it.

As for explaining the rule difference, good question, i would ask BBW to write it, he is good with words

14. January 2007, 11:58:27
ghardh 
Subject: Re: Dice Chess
MadMonkey: I have noticed the same annoying necessary to move the king. And just that detail is the reason for my voting to change the rules. A new variant will lead sooner or later to a situation, that the old variant wouldn't be played anymore.
Btw., how would you explain the differences between the two variants to the average player?

14. January 2007, 11:51:33
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re: Dice Chess
Hieronymus: Of course the probabilities would change as pieces are taken, as in Chess, if 2 Pawns are taken, odds are 6-1.

Its has to be new, i think the change is alot. I have played alot of games of it now, and one thing that crops up alot is having to move your King for no reason, just because the Kings pawn square is free for example. At least with an odds change, the chances of things like that happening are not evens LOL
You may say small, but there was only a small change in Ataxx & Assimilation, but from experience i know most people prefer Assimilation.

14. January 2007, 11:45:29
ghardh 
Subject: Re: Dice Chess
Modified by ghardh (14. January 2007, 11:46:38)
MadMonkey: How should the probabilities be affected, if there are already pieces captured? I think, if there are e.g. 2 pawns captured, there should be a ratio of 6:1 instead of 8:1.
And why this should be a new game? The changes would be minor enough (most players wouldn't notice them), that they should affect the current version.

14. January 2007, 11:37:50
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re: Dice Chess
'Percentile Dice Chess' or just 'Percentile Chess' there you go Fencer, an instant new game, and you only have to change the code slightly

14. January 2007, 11:34:40
joshi tm 
Subject: Re: Dice Chess
Marfitalu: Ok, when the dice shows 4.

14. January 2007, 11:32:48
joshi tm 
Subject: Re: Dice Chess
MadMonkey: Yes, en passant could be played also ( on a 1), I think you should castle also on a 4.

14. January 2007, 11:29:31
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re: Dice Chess
Hieronymus: Thats exactly what i mean

Yes you can castle & Kings can capture Kings, havent tried en passant yet

14. January 2007, 11:27:31
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re: Dice Chess
joshi tm: Like you say, the odds would be normal Chess odds as such, as in which actual piece may move. In other words, if you had advanced your king pawn, the odds would would be 8-1 they you would have to move the King, where as now its evens.

The game would be totaly different, call 'Dice Chess the Revenge of the 16 sided percentile dice' or 'Percentile Dice Chess'

percentile, love that word danheg LOL

<< <   260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top