 |
|
 BrainKing.comBoard for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future. If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider). World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Knight. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 4. June 2017, 08:46:42 Subject: Re: S-B wrongly calculated  Marshmud: They are both tie-breakers. The rule below in SE tournaments, and S-B in regular tourneys. In other words, Thom27 is correct in his original post. 3. June 2017, 16:02:02 Subject: Re: S-B wrongly calculated Marshmud: This only applies to "single elimination" tournaments. "Warning! If a normal game ends as a draw, the player with lower BKR would advance to the next round (in case of equal BKRs, the one who didn't start the game - the black player in most games). If you want to avoid such situations, create this tournament with 1 win matches instead." 26. May 2015, 20:25:10 Subject: Re: Fencer can you fix this ? 22. May 2015, 21:31:35 Subject: Hmm... První turnaj se zdvojovací kostkou Why is my S-B score 0? Have I been disqualified from proceeding into next rounds where the deciding factor is the S-B? 27. November 2014, 20:30:20 Subject: Re: yeah! Hrqls: And looking at your Section, pal, you would not have made it to Round 2 had the S-B been calculated correctly. :) 27. November 2014, 20:26:40 Subject: Re: yeah! BGBedlam: Absolutely... Why was my S-B 0? 27. November 2014, 20:08:32 Subject: Re: yeah! Hrqls: Can somebody please tell me why Section 3 in Round 1 had only 1 winner? 20. May 2014, 20:34:16 Subject: Re: Carpe Diem: I do confirm that one of my games has mysteriously disappeared indeed... Not that I care much... we can start a new one... 2. March 2014, 22:31:35 Subject: Re: Fischer's clock Aganju: Be aware that BK stands for BugKing. 2. March 2014, 20:21:15 Subject: Re: Fischer's clock aaru: Why? b/k 5. February 2014, 19:28:55 Subject: Re: Upgrade! Aganju: Actually, I find it more likely that more features and functionalities will be removed. 4. February 2014, 12:40:39 Subject: Re: Fevga Rule Resher: (1) I don't know. You may have discussed the game in a fellowship. (2) The rule says that if (a) opponent has collected all his checkers onto the one point behind player's prime, then (b) the player must unblock a point in his prime to allow the opponent a chance to move. The situation described as (a) did not occur in your game, hence (b) did not (or would not) have to be enforced. 4. February 2014, 12:07:40 Subject: Re: Fevga Rule Resher: (1) We cannot see your in-game comments. (2) The rule being discussed does not apply to the situation in question (Move 25) in your game with Zach. 2. February 2014, 10:51:35 Subject: Re: Fevga Rule cd power: The bug has been "in force" since the implementation of the game. I recommend that the rules are not taken too seriously. 23. August 2013, 10:53:30 Subject: Re: rabbitoid: Dano is around, but I think he was banned from all DBs. 22. August 2013, 17:20:02 Subject: Re: Marshmud: ... a little bit... yeah :) 22. August 2013, 15:02:23 Subject: Re: Justaminute: Good point. I no longer read the Feature Requests board, as I believe it would be a waste of time. 22. August 2013, 14:36:51 Modified by Pedro Martínez (22. August 2013, 14:37:26) On another note, I have now found out that the tiny-font line that used to appear right below the name of a poster and saying what the person is doing has been removed… Oh well, just another useful feature that is gone… 22. August 2013, 14:04:42 Subject: Re: jadarite: You do get this correct. I am replying to someone who has made a suggestion. It doesn't concern me at all. Your suggestion only perplexes me as I have no idea why anyone would bother conducting lengthy discussions about a suggestion that they know will never come to life. I have a suggestion too: It would help me a lot if Friday came right after Tuesday. Now let's discuss the pros and cons… I do not know why you care if I “actually” play Shogi, but you are welcome to visit my profile and see for yourself. 22. August 2013, 13:46:44 Subject: Re: jadarite: So if I understand you correctly, you are making suggestions even though you know they are never going to be implemented? Well, good luck then. 22. August 2013, 13:15:40 Subject: Re: jadarite: I think you do not understand or realize that the “1999 design”, as you call it, will stay, regardless of any 2013 suggestions. 22. August 2013, 12:24:00 Can I vote somewhere for the most useless discussion ever seen on BK? 22. August 2013, 07:13:01 Subject: Re: Question about membership levels. jadarite: Do not take anything written on this site too seriously. There are many obsolete texts here, as well as just about as many missing ones. And as pointed out by rabbitoid, the One is no longer bothered... 18. August 2013, 08:59:33 Subject: Re: Paying members Justaminute: I think the word "life" in your post is quite unnecessary. :) 11. August 2013, 23:46:56 Subject: Re: Ludo. Marshmud: I'm sure it would… If… :)) 22. July 2013, 16:32:57 Subject: Re: This site's current estimated worth is... Heluvagi: I don't think he can be arsed. He has stated several times that BK is no longer one of his priorities. This and the deterioration of this site I (and actually, we all) have been experiencing is also making me believe that BK is not worth much for the time being. 19. July 2013, 23:21:46 Subject: Re: This site's current estimated worth is... Artful Dodger: ranging from 72,000 to over 370,000 I am more inclined to trust these estimates: http://awcheck.me/en/site/brainking.com http://brainking.com.w3snoop.com/ 19. July 2013, 12:51:08 Subject: Re: This site's current estimated worth is... ketchuplover: How did you arrive at that conclusion? 3. June 2013, 17:51:10 Subject: Re: The SJY cup? Heluvagi: “On everyone else's mind?”  27. April 2013, 17:17:37 I actually believe it is clear to the majority of the people reading this what the one who decides what his priorities are is trying to say. Accept BugKing or leave it. It is as simple as that… 19. April 2013, 10:57:50 Subject: Re: long tournament Heluvagi: Speaking of that tournament, I would like to know how it is possible that milionovej kluk made it to the second round, whereas cardinal and I didn't. 5. December 2011, 16:45:39 Subject: Re: thisbeme pedestrian: Thanks, I can see it now. Interesting, though, that you won't see him complaining about THAT here… he will complain about running out of time (claiming it's a bug), other people sending him unpleasant messages (claiming they are harassing him), and whatnot, but NOT about an obvious bug he must have noticed… 5. December 2011, 15:13:58 Subject: thisbeme Vacation days left: 7 days 20 hours Now how is that possible? 18. November 2011, 13:41:24 Subject: Re: Color Code Conquerers Gabriel Almeida: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJcPp2aJf64 18. November 2011, 13:38:30 Subject: Re: Color Code Conquerers Fencer: You should stop looking at and watching that Vodafone commercial… 11. November 2011, 14:15:22 Subject: Re: Do I get shot now? Aganju: Yes, three times in the head! :) 11. November 2011, 14:02:11 Subject: Re: How about a "New Rook" tournament Aganju: I checked my “Brains History” and it says I got my first 50 Brains for having purchased a Rook membership for a person whose name I cannot mention here because it is prohibited to mention names here under a harsh penalty. 11. November 2011, 13:31:45 Subject: Re: How about a "New Rook" tournament Aganju: I must have won it somewhere… 11. November 2011, 13:16:19 Subject: Re: How about a "New Rook" tournament Modified by Pedro Martínez (11. November 2011, 13:32:33) Thom27: I have never bought myself a single Brain on this site – only bought them for others. Yet, you must understand that the Brains are used as an equivalent of money here, since we can purchase membership with them. That's why I don't think “20 free Brains for all” is such a good idea, at least not from the owner's point of view. However, making the users be able to purchase them, that's a whole different story. 11. November 2011, 12:32:39 Subject: Re: How about a "New Rook" tournament Thom27: Wouldn't it be easier just to enable Brains purchasing again? 21. September 2011, 15:47:57 Subject: Re: Move and go to 18. August 2011, 16:12:39 Subject: Re: ughaibu: And I blocked that hacking poop ages ago… 18. August 2011, 16:11:42 Subject: Re: ughaibu: I am not aware of any oher way. 16. August 2011, 14:25:44 Subject: Re: for people looking for a faster browser DeaD man WalkiN: 1. August 2011, 18:55:01 I am hereby requesting the BrainKing Team to ban the two accounts below from Discussion Boards. It has gone too far. Personal data should never be posted on a public board without the person's consent. 21. June 2011, 23:21:09 Subject: Re: Iamon lyme: The board was on approval earlier today. 1. June 2011, 16:57:15 Subject: Re: free prize tournament MadMonkey: It doesn't matter how dictionary.com or any other website defines “gambling” … it does matter, however, how “gambling” is defined by/under the applicable legislation… 30. May 2011, 11:46:58 Subject: Re: Modified by Pedro Martínez (30. May 2011, 11:47:21) Mélusine: When submitting your move in any game, you can “Jouer et (rester ici) Fixer cette action comme défaut” 23. May 2011, 17:11:36 Subject: Re: Mélusine: Go to your fellowship and click “Create” where it says “Add a board”. << < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |