 |
|
  TournamentsPlease use this board to discuss Tournaments and Team Tournaments, ask questions and hopefully find the answers you are looking for. Personal attacks, arguing or baiting will not be tolerated on this board. If you have, or see a problem or something you are not happy about or think is wrong, please contact one of the above Moderators OR contact a Global Moderator HERE Tournaments Team Tournaments Dec 2024 - Dark Battleboats 7 - Starts 6th Dec You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Knight. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 > >> 18. June 2007, 09:05:09 Subject: 5 18. June 2007, 13:26:08 Subject: Re: 5  aaru: We cannot read your messages lol. The link will take us to our message box. 18. June 2007, 13:33:51 Subject: Re: 5  Eriisa: Fixed ____ aaru 18. June 2007, 13:52:49 Subject: Re: 5 aaru: LOL! Nothing like a 5 way tie!!!! 18. June 2007, 19:08:20 18. June 2007, 21:37:27 Subject: a drop of water is a grain of gold 18. June 2007, 23:06:20  Tournament: GAME ADDICTS OPEN TOURNAMENT (Backgammon Race) Your tournament is finished. Winner of the tournament: "Snoopy" 19. June 2007, 00:52:14 Subject: tournament Modified by goodbyebking (19. June 2007, 05:28:53)        ..................................................................................  This tournament is called Vancouver, British Columbia19. June 2007, 01:45:37 Subject: CONGRATS !!! Tournament: FAST Single elimination for 4 - Deja Vu (PahTum) Your tournament is finished. Winner of the tournament: Pioneer54 19. June 2007, 08:22:20 Subject: Re: CONGRATS !!! Eriisa: Thank you, Sally, and thanks for any previous like mentions you may have made. :)) (I read this board very infrequently.) 19. June 2007, 15:57:26 Subject: Sooo, Where's All The Pawns At? :) 19. June 2007, 18:50:50 Subject: Carnarvon 20. June 2007, 01:12:08 Subject: CONGRATULATIONS GO OUT TO: " arpa " Backgammon, Backgammon, Backgammon :) (Nackgammon) Your tournament is finished. Winner of the tournament: arpa   20. June 2007, 16:57:44 Subject: CONGRATULATIONS GO OUT TO: " jaqueline " Gotta Love Gammon :) (Crowded Backgammon) Your tournament is finished. Winner of the tournament: jaqueline 21. June 2007, 00:06:50 Tournament: Ali's Easter Tournament 1st 8 (Logik) Your tournament is finished. Winner of the tournament: arpa 21. June 2007, 08:08:51 Subject: dice chess & battleboat plus  Dice chess - need 4 more Battleboat plus - need 2 more Single elimination, 8 players, 3 days standard vacation. Please join! Yippee - 100 tourneys won :) Thanks Jo 21. June 2007, 13:47:12 Subject: There he goes again! :) Tournament: FAST Single elimination for 4 - Deja Vu (Scrambled Eggs) Your tournament is finished. Winner of the tournament: Pioneer54 21. June 2007, 21:56:16 Subject: CONGRATULATIONS GO TO: " neznalek " For The Love of Backgammon :) (Backgammon) Your tournament is finished. Winner of the tournament: neznalek 22. June 2007, 14:54:47 Subject: How is this a time out? Tournament: ABSTRAKTA BACKGAMMON CHALLENGE 2007, Discussion - 2 messages Game ID: 2516237, Match ID: 161261 This tournament shound have a 30 day limit and no bonus, but it times out in under 3 hours. It does not make sense. 22. June 2007, 15:04:42 Subject: Re: How is this a time out?  purplehawke: It makes sense but you don't understand Fischer's clock. The game started 30 days ago, now it timeouts. 22. June 2007, 19:02:40 Subject: Tournament deletions I was wondering why the tournament I had posted was deleted.It didn't fill in the original time,but was only 7 days over.I have seen tournaments waiting to be filled into the third week and they are still listed. 22. June 2007, 19:48:45 Subject: FAST Single elimination for 4 - Deja Vu Too FAST Single elimination for 4 - Deja Vu Too 1 day moves, No days off. * Loop Chess (2 - open) * Cheversi (2 - open) * Checkers (1 - open) * Line4 (1 - open) * PahTum (1 - open) * Crowded Backgammon (open) * Battleboats Plus (2 - open) * Jungle (open) * Triple Dice Poker (4 - running) * Frog Finder (1 - open) Games will start as they fill up. 22. June 2007, 20:05:39 Subject: Calling All Pawns - Two More Needed For Backgammon..... 22. June 2007, 20:19:05 Subject: Triple Gammon For Eight :) 22. June 2007, 20:22:42 Subject: Anybody Else Want To Play? 22. June 2007, 22:46:40 Subject: Re: How is this a time out?  purplehawke: To learn more about the different time limits, check out this article: http://brainrook.com/archives/54-Time-limit-for-games-on-BrainKing.html
I've wrote it up awhile back since the fischer clock games can really fool many people - heck, I don't even sign up for those types of games anymore. Anyway, I tried to explain with examples in the article and many have found it very helpful in explaining how the different time limits work. Jim Dandy: Did you set the option of "Days after the deadline before a tournament with not enough players is deleted:" to 7 days, or 29 days (with I think 29 days is the max)? Of course now that it is deleted, there is no way to check I don't think. 22. June 2007, 23:15:49 Subject: Re: How is this a time out? coan.net: Thanks for the info,i'm new to setting up tournaments.I'll try it again with your tip in mind  23. June 2007, 01:42:10 Subject: Re: How is this a time out? Jim Dandy: Plus I believe you can still edit the start date settings before the tournament starts. So if you see that it is about to be deleted, you can edit the tournament to another date to give more time for people to sign in. 23. June 2007, 10:19:24 23. June 2007, 14:30:17 Subject: seedings in single elimination how are they worked out for instant in this tournament one day only single elimination i got drawn against the top player hardly seems fair 23. June 2007, 14:41:30 Subject: Re: seedings in single elimination "Snoopy": lol, your dooooooooooooooomed lol 23. June 2007, 14:43:57 Subject: Re: seedings in single elimination Modified by ScrambledEggs (23. June 2007, 14:46:00) Oceans Apart: yes but thats not the point im making i would like to know how seedings are worked out for future reference 23. June 2007, 14:50:27 Subject: Re: seedings in single elimination "Snoopy": The point is to get the top players to the final rounds. I will make a note about it in the blog later today. 23. June 2007, 14:51:49 Subject: Re: seedings in single elimination Fencer: okay thanks 23. June 2007, 16:05:58 Subject: Re: seedings in single elimination "Snoopy": I know it wasnt, i was just jesting with you  23. June 2007, 22:31:19 Subject: Re: seedings in single elimination Fencer: "the ideal form of the last rounds should be 1-4 3-2 or 1-8 5-4 3-6 7-2." This is from the notes blog, and has been in practice from quite some time, but I have never thought it made any sense. You can have the top players meet in the final round (in theory), but why should the second-highest rated player get the bottom slot? Rather, it could be: 1-3 2-4 or 1-4 2-3 for 4 players, and 1-5 3-7 2-6 4-8, which would still permit the top two seeds to meet in the "finale" 23. June 2007, 23:05:15 Subject: Re: seedings in single elimination  Fencer: then why should lower ranked players even bother to play in these tournaments? 23. June 2007, 23:36:51 Subject: Re: seedings in single elimination Pioneer54: Interesting. But the seedings are like in a Tennis tournament. Should be like Football, just at random. 24. June 2007, 07:08:22 Subject: Re: seedings in single elimination joshi tm: I received many complaints when the first tournaments had been released with random seedings. But it can be done as an option. 24. June 2007, 10:33:07 24. June 2007, 10:35:45 Subject: Re: seedings in single elimination  Fencer, Pioneer54, volant and joshi tm: Could we have the choice of all 3. Random could be default, then the way it is now and also the way Pioneer has it (1-5 3-7 2-6 4-8) which is fairer and the one i think would be me popular  24. June 2007, 11:45:32 Modified by goodbyebking (24. June 2007, 11:54:56) 24. June 2007, 11:51:30 Subject: Re: emmett: Can not read it emmett, it takes me to Message Box  24. June 2007, 11:54:09 Subject: Re: MadMonkey: I fixed it. Sorry about the faulty link. Thanks MM 24. June 2007, 12:03:23 Subject: Re: emmett: Now, i have never seen that before  Have to wait for Fencer on that one i reckon. A complete 20 player Tournament, that is not complete LOL, thats funny, less game you have to play anyway emmett  lol24. June 2007, 12:06:39 Subject: Re: MadMonkey: Thanks for the feedback. I'm glad that it wasn't the late hour that was contributing to my lack of comprehension on this tournament. If Fencer checks this out, the question is why can't player 7 play 9? Answer: probably bug. << < 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Congratulations, Carnarvon, for winning 
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |