User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: SueQ , coan.net 
 Backgammon

Backgammon and variants.

Backgammon Links


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105   > >>
14. June 2005, 04:52:37
Czuch 
Thanks guys! I guess its just gonna take some lucky dice on the end either way :)

14. June 2005, 04:33:56
coan.net 
Subject: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: I would probable make a move like that.

How I see it, your opponent is probable going to put you on the bar for awhile where you get to sit and do nothing. So now, hopefully you will get some moves in with him sitting on the bar - hopefully putting you in a beter situation in the end where a quick run can still keep you in the game.

14. June 2005, 03:30:07
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: I don't think it made your situation worse, but you will have to let him go anyway...

14. June 2005, 03:25:47
Czuch 
Can someone who knows how to play this game take a look at this game and tell me if my latest move was the correct thing to do?

http://brainking.com/game/ShowGame?g=864260

I have never seen it a BAD THING TO DO TO BLOCK SOMEONE IN THE KITCHEN LIKE THIS, BUT IT SEEMS i JUST MIGHT HAVE MADE MY SITUATION WORSE?

13. June 2005, 23:55:30
lovelysharon 
Jason and I have this one going .. http://brainking.com/en/ShowGame?g=370322

13. June 2005, 08:17:01
danoschek 
Subject: backgammon program
. - if I may determine the rolls for my opponent, I'd certainly need
good software to make the probability of all my winning unconspicious ... ... ~*~

12. June 2005, 04:50:25
redsales 
Subject: grenv
it's actually not too bad, i played a 300 mover with qusar but it can get nuts. I heard there's one over on IYT that started in 2003 and is over 1000 moves, ongoing.

12. June 2005, 01:25:12
grenv 
I'm glad I never started an anti-backgammon game.

12. June 2005, 01:23:53
coan.net 
Oh, and in case anyone wants to look at all current games:

http://brainking.com/en/StartedGameList?bms=0&tp=25

12. June 2005, 01:15:22
Harassed 
Subject: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: huh, may be someone should create 30 days per move prize tournament with 1000$ prize. May be some would even survive until the end

12. June 2005, 01:14:29
Chessmaster1000 
Subject: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: I guess if i and BBW play such a long AntiBackgammon game, with our regular super-quick play, we will finish when the sun becomes a red giant............!

12. June 2005, 01:11:50
coan.net 
Honorable mention (still going):

http://brainking.com/en/ShowGame?g=560197

And even a little longer then the one in the previous post (still ongoing also):

http://brainking.com/en/ShowGame?g=751978

12. June 2005, 01:10:11
coan.net 

12. June 2005, 01:07:55
Chessmaster1000 
Damn! 550 moves????????
This is boring of fun........?

12. June 2005, 01:05:23
Harassed 
I am wondering what was the longest anti backgammon game here so far, without prolonging for purpose. I found so far: http://brainking.com/en/ArchivedGame?g=353288
It was resigned so it would last few moves more. I know Fencer can find the longest game with one simple database operation

11. June 2005, 23:45:54
grenv 
Thanks, I'll let you know. I may change the OS first. :)

11. June 2005, 23:42:48
Chessmaster1000 
If you are obsessed of having GNUBG i can e-mail you an old but VERY STABLE version of it. It has almost the same strength (the newer one is a little stronger) but not the newest great graphics and all the fancy things! Comparing the old with new:
Old strength = 98
New strength = 100
Old total features and graphics = 12
New total features and graphics = 100

The whole package is arounf 12 MB so my e-mail will compain with a dial-up connection but if you want it, i can send it..........?!?!?!??!

11. June 2005, 23:37:06
grenv 
Subject: Re:
pgt: I'm on Windows 2000, which is notoriously crappy for playing games. Time to upgrade to a real operating system it seems.

11. June 2005, 23:29:58
frolind 
Send an email to the mailing list.
http://www.gnubg.org/index.php?itemid=11
I got quick and helpful response from 2 members of the gnubg team when I used it.

11. June 2005, 23:29:57
pgt 
Subject: Re:
grenv: I've run it on a laptop with XP SP2 with no problems.

11. June 2005, 23:25:14
Chessmaster1000 
Modified by Chessmaster1000 (11. June 2005, 23:25:48)
I have the same problem. After 5-10 minutes and when i'm trying to maximize the window it crushes!
When i asked what is the possible cause of the problem they said: update your graphic card and get Windows XP! (I have ME)

11. June 2005, 23:20:50
grenv 
Well I'm on a laptop, so the graphics card is probably strange. Anyway I've tried about a million settings changes etc etc and it crashes every time. Pity, it seems like a good game - I guess I'll never know.

11. June 2005, 23:19:04
Chessmaster1000 
Yes it doesn't........But some graphic cards probably don't "fit" with it......
Of course there are millions of other possible reasons that it doesn't run.......

11. June 2005, 23:08:43
grenv 
Windows 2000 SP3. The game doesn't seem like one that needs a great graphics card.

11. June 2005, 22:18:03
Chessmaster1000 
What Windows version are you using........?
This is most probably a graphic card problem......

11. June 2005, 21:15:35
grenv 
Subject: gnubg
So I downloaded this software and tried playing, but it hangs after about 10 moves and the only way out is shutting it down from the Task Manager. Anyone else experience that?

11. June 2005, 14:54:57
frolind 

11. June 2005, 00:35:32
Pedro Martínez 
No, I didn't...I didn't even know it was possible...it's the first game-playing program I've ever used...LOL

11. June 2005, 00:12:34
Chessmaster1000 
Modified by Chessmaster1000 (11. June 2005, 00:13:22)
Did you save the games..........?
No! (I guess--All beginners with a program don't save nothing!)

10. June 2005, 23:43:44
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re:
Modified by Pedro Martínez (10. June 2005, 23:44:51)
Chessmaster1000: It says "expert"... *shrugs*
Now I lost 5-2...intermediate...

10. June 2005, 23:36:01
Chessmaster1000 
I have to add that winning 12 straight 5-point matches against GNUBG in a level of more than Advanced (Expert or more) would make you the best Backgammon player on the galaxy with a huge difference from the 2nd. With few words: It's impossible!
So i guess you played with Intermediate or something like that........

10. June 2005, 23:32:45
Chessmaster1000 
<Go to SETTINGS->PLAYERS and choose Player 0 or 1 depending on where the GNUBG was playing (The other normally would say human).
Then see the Checker play what setting it has........(Expert, Advanced, Beginner.....,etc)

10. June 2005, 23:27:24
Pedro Martínez 
I have no idea what settings I have it on..I just clicked new game, set it to 5-point matches and played...where can I see the level of the computer?

I have just finished another two 5-point mathces, won both of them but now it shows that in the first one, I was playing like and Intermediate (? the Czech translation of the program is not so good so I hope it's intermediate) and like a World Class in the other one...no very bad moves this time but a few bad moves...it seems that the number of "very bad moves" is decisive as for the final determination of your level of playing...

10. June 2005, 23:19:21
playBunny 
Subject: Re: GnuBg
Modified by playBunny (10. June 2005, 23:20:02)
Pedro Martínez: What settings do you have it on? As installed it plays weaker than it's capable of. However, ten 5-point matches is still hot stuff.

I usually advise people to set Supremo for Chequer play and World Class for Cube decisions in both Settings/Analysis and Settings/Evaluation. Go higher if you have plenty of patience or a stonking fast machine.

Don't forget to do Settings/Save settings afterwards otherwise it will lose the changes when you exit.

10. June 2005, 23:08:14
Chessmaster1000 
Modified by Chessmaster1000 (10. June 2005, 23:08:41)
You won 10 5-point matches???????? WOW! Interesting...... And it says you play like a beginner? So your luck should be huge in these 10 5-point games! But this is really impossible (or very difficult) to have in at least 50 games, a huge luck........
On what level GNUBG was playing........? It offers a strong opponent at Expert, World class and above. Advanced or below is just bad (or not so good)..........

10. June 2005, 20:46:26
frolind 
Subject: Re:
Pedro Martínez: Try the tutor mode. It will point out your errors while you're playing. Make sure the settings are decent.

10. June 2005, 20:42:53
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
Pedro Martínez: Keep at it, you will get better....

10. June 2005, 20:33:20
Pedro Martínez 
LOL, I have downloaded the gnubg program, played 10 5-point games with it, won all of them and the session analysis tells me I'm playing like a beginner, marking 1 or two of my moves in each game as very bad...interesting...a lot of stuff to learn I suppose...

10. June 2005, 20:20:13
frolind 
Subject: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: A program would absolutely help a player. Because of the dice, a poor player could beat a great player (such as a the programs snowie and gnubg) in a single game. But in the long term a program will have way better results than the rest of us.

10. June 2005, 20:12:27
Czuch 
I saw where Fencer said that it is okay to play with/ use programs on this site, and that programs would not help in dice games anyway.

Is this true? It seems to me that it is possible for a program to help in a backgammon game.... just because it uses dice does not mean that the game is decided soley on luck...

10. June 2005, 11:39:09
Hrqls 
Subject: Re: playing with the cube
AbigailII: thanks!!!

10. June 2005, 11:35:56
AbigailII 
Subject: Re: playing with the cube

10. June 2005, 11:33:51
Hrqls 
Subject: Re: playing with the cube
frolind: ah thats a nicer way to look at it indeed :)

what are the differences in tactics whith an odd number of points from the finish or an even number of points ?

do you want to main an odd number away ?

10. June 2005, 11:07:00
frolind 
Subject: Re: playing with the cube
Hrqls: The score affects your play. 0-0 in a match to 4 is equivalent to to 1-1 in a match to 5, or 55-55 in a match to 59. So when talking about a score we often say 4away-4away, making the length irrelevant.

Odd match lengths are the most common, both online and offline. I don't know why.

10. June 2005, 11:00:30
Hrqls 
Subject: Re: playing with the cube
lovelysharon: true .. you are correct .. glad he didnt backgammon me :) *phew*

(although it wouldnt have mattered for the match ... just for my pride ;))

why are most matches an odd number of points ... yesterday i played a match (and 2 rematches) with someone for 4 points .. does that change the tactics a lot ?

9. June 2005, 23:00:55
lovelysharon 
Subject: Re: playing with the cube
Hrqls:

and if one of your pieces is stuck in your opponents home when he bears off ... its a backgammon and worth 3 points or 3 times the cube value ... your description of 2 pts is called a gammon

9. June 2005, 15:13:55
Hrqls 
Subject: Re: playing with the cube
frolind: thanks ... a good read ... have to calculate the chances when i have a bit more time .. so i can fully understand .. nice link :)

9. June 2005, 13:31:24
frolind 
Subject: Re: playing with the cube

9. June 2005, 13:25:04
Hrqls 
Subject: playing with the cube
i learned something new for the cube!!!

i always offered a double when i was in the lead .. and sometimes to get a psychological advantage :)

but now i had my opponent in the lead .. and wondered why he didnt offer a double (he was at 2 points in a 4 points match) ... of course i would have declined as he was far in the lead .. bringing the score to 3 points for him

it turned out he was more experienced than me .. as i didnt offer the double .. but played the game to the end .. and backgammoned me to get 2 points to win the match

so for all other people who start playing with the cube ... the cube isnt the only way to get 2 points ... you can also finish before your opponent has a piece off the board .. and thereby win 2 points :)

9. June 2005, 12:08:08
Hrqls 
Subject: Re: playing with the cube
frolind: i was confused at first as well .. but noticed when i read the pages :)

thanks

<< <   96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top