 |
|
 Feature requestsDo you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board! If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board. For further information about Feature Requests, please visit this link on the Brainking.Info site : http://brainking.info/archives/20-About-feature-requests.html You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Knight. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 1 2 3 > >> 14. April 2011, 10:51:35 Subject: Re: Modified by Pedro Martínez (14. April 2011, 10:53:39)  Fencer: I don't know if this is in any way related to any change you have made, but links to finished games in single elimination tourneys are not working for me now… they take me to a blank page… 30. March 2011, 15:43:26 Subject: Re: Rolling Dice and Auto-pass 16. February 2011, 03:20:10 Subject: Re: Modified by Pedro Martínez (16. February 2011, 03:20:51) Artful Dodger: That tells a lot about how you read the BugTracker… I reported it back in January 2005!  http://brainking.com/cz/ReadBug?bgi=242 16. February 2011, 03:02:53 Subject: Re: Artful Dodger: You know what's funny? In a game with a person on your blocked list, you can't see their current activity, while they can see yours… 11. February 2011, 23:21:21 Subject: Re: Correct our posts grenv: You are a Bishop. 11. February 2011, 02:20:40 Subject: Re: Correct our posts grenv: I suppose Vikings has told you the reason in a personal message. Can you please share it with the rest of us? 25. January 2011, 17:44:12 Subject: Re: rod03801: Now Fencer better complies…  9. January 2011, 12:40:37 Subject: Re: Keep active players on the leader boards Universal Eyes: Yes.  8. August 2010, 13:20:33 Subject: Re: El Cid: It does, in the way aaru understood it. :) 8. August 2010, 12:55:29 Subject: Re: Public tournaments won El Cid: But it's an Achievement awarded for team tournament wins, not fellowship tournament wins. :) 8. August 2010, 01:19:28 Subject: Re: Public tournaments won El Cid: I am afraid you are wrong, there is no Achievement for fellowship tournaments. 7. August 2010, 21:28:11 Subject: Re: Public tournaments won El Cid: Public tournaments = non-fellowship tournaments, irrespective of whether they are open to everybody or invitation-only. 5. August 2010, 19:51:56 Subject: Re: 14. July 2010, 17:14:05 Subject: Re: die rolls that really ARE random plaintiger: Read also the Backgammon board. It has been discussed there quite a lot, and someone has even downloaded a bunch of games and made a statistical analysis of the occurrence of the opening rolls. 14. July 2010, 16:19:35 Subject: Re: die rolls that really ARE random plaintiger: It is obvious to everyone who plays back on a regular basis here and has their eyes open. 5. April 2010, 14:52:51 Subject: Re: Submit buttons Thom27: It takes two clicks to change it in the drop-down list…  20. February 2010, 18:15:50 Subject: Re: Restrict the number of tournaments created, by each player, per month wetware:  30. January 2010, 04:37:20 Subject: Re: Nothingness: Go to my profile, click “Finished games” and then “Show Pedro Martínez's games with me only”. However, this feature would be much easier and simpler to use if had our Last 10 Finished Games back. :) 29. January 2010, 07:16:32 Subject: Re: request AlliumCepa: Oh did he?!  29. January 2010, 04:54:29 Subject: Re: request Nothingness: We have not played any chess games against each other and I do not have any games of chess in the Waiting Room. 20. November 2009, 02:36:17 Subject: Re: Clone Wars Tourny Snoopy: Our fellowship (Společenství přátel) actually did that in that tourney after I had stopped playing here, and nominated Mrsx (aka Tajny) to play instead of me. 26. September 2009, 02:08:55 Subject: Re: Rainbow Road: These are the tourneys created by you, for example. :) 6. September 2009, 17:59:59 Subject: Re: Group of games Pason69: "go to the next game of similar type" 2. September 2009, 15:01:48 Subject: Re: Ponds rabbitoid: The average pond now has enough trouble collecting 16 reluctant players from all over the planet. for a live game, they'd all need to be present at start. That is exactly the reason why I brought it up here. My guess is that live ponds would stir the interest and it would not be too difficult to get 16 players for a game. But it's only my "guess" and I wanted to know what other people think of it. Anyhow, I like grenv's idea of allowing Pawns to play live ponds. 2. September 2009, 03:05:20 Subject: Re: Ponds alexlee: I should also mention that this idea is not to be interpreted as an effort to change the ponds as we know them. There would be two types of ponds available: the regular ones and these new "live" ponds. 2. September 2009, 02:46:21 Subject: Ponds There has been a idea of starting the next round in ponds immediately after all players submit their bids. In this way, it would be possible to finish a pond within hours or even minutes. Of course, the maximum time per move would still apply, however the creator would have the option to set as low time limits as one minute. I have already informed Fencer about this idea, but I would like to know how popular such ponds would be. So if anyone would post their comments, it would be mostly appreciated. 9. August 2009, 23:54:27 Subject: Re: "montecarlo" - new gammon proposal gammonrace, Herlock Sholmes: User Agreement, General Guidelines, Section 1: "Each individual who plays on BrainKing is asked to use one, and only one, BrainKing account." 21. April 2009, 20:47:09 Subject: Re: Idea for a new game! Teachme2play: Indeed. Connect6 and Pente are definitely much more different. 2. April 2009, 21:06:42 Subject: Re: rod03801: I want to see the part of the User Agreement that prohibits me from posting names here. 2. April 2009, 17:22:19 Subject: Re: Holidays and auto pass rabbitoid: Undertaker. did mention a name and I encourage everyone to do so as well. 2. April 2009, 16:59:38 Subject: Re: Holidays and auto pass rod03801: Why not? 2. April 2009, 13:52:39 Subject: Re: Holidays and auto pass Marfitalu: You should be entitled to 10/35/45 vacations days per year. Period. Not less, not more. Regardless of how many times you renew your membership. However, this is just my opinion from a user's perspective. I do understand that a manager might have a different opinion, based on the fact that the current system brings more money in the "BK budget". 16. February 2009, 18:52:38 Subject: Re: "GERRY": Tomorrow, 5 p.m. ET. 4. December 2008, 06:47:40 Subject: Re: Modified by Pedro Martínez (4. December 2008, 06:48:01) AbigailII: Why would anyone considering the future of BrainKing want to deal with some US laws? Act 121/2000 Coll. (the Czech Copyright Act) is the only thing that matters in this respect. 5. November 2008, 01:05:10 Subject: Re: Time limits Fitzmertz: Ask him, not me. I just wanted to point out the ridiculousness of your argument. 5. November 2008, 00:58:23 Subject: Re: Time limits Fitzmertz: mad monkey is a paying member until 2010 is that not commitment to your site? Bobes is a paying member until the day he dies. Is that not commitment to Fencer's site? 3. November 2008, 23:24:56 Subject: Re: Time limits Thad: Well, people in your tourney move quite fast. I don't know what you're complaining about. Why did you sign up for that tournament in the first place? Note that I'm not advocating the time-limit or vacation system here, I'm just saying that there's nothing wrong in YOUR example, in this respect. 3. November 2008, 22:16:04 Subject: Re: Time limits BBW, MadMonkey: I don't see any difference. If you run into a game with an idiot, the time settings are of no importance, unless it is a no-vacation game. 3. November 2008, 21:06:56 Subject: Re: Time limits MadMonkey: 4 months? That's nothing...compared to this: Šachy (Harassed vs. lukulus) 27. January 2007, 02:53:21 Subject: Re: Table in Dice Poker. Czuch Czuckers: That is correct, provided the person to whom the account was sold is not using it. 27. January 2007, 02:45:56 Subject: Re: Table in Dice Poker. Czuch Czuckers: If you "give" me your account, it won't become mine because you're not allowed to do so in the first place. 27. January 2007, 02:40:47 Subject: Re: Table in Dice Poker. Czuch Czuckers: Oh yes, it would. 27. January 2007, 02:25:19 Subject: Re: Table in Dice Poker. Czuch Czuckers: User Agreement: General Guidelines, Paragraph 2: "You are NOT allowed to let other people use your account." 23. January 2007, 18:59:49 Subject: Re: Cheversi imbalance and new games in general MadMonkey: Two days ago I would have agreed, but after being beaten as black by oliottavio, I say that you need to play better than "reasonably" to win against a top-class opponent. 17. January 2007, 15:55:06 Subject: Re: Gordon Shumway: Oh, you're right...:) I just don't pay attention to the colors. It's way easier to look at the name of the game than remember all the colors... 17. January 2007, 15:45:13 Will we also have different colors for pro 5-in-line? Small fast espionage? Battleboats plus? Corner checkers? Etc? Etc? 8. January 2007, 22:03:10 Subject: Re: Team tournaments Czuch Czuckers: LOL...:) BTW, I like your request too...  8. January 2007, 21:56:30 Subject: Re: Team tournaments Kiwiyeti: I second your request. 22. December 2006, 14:29:58 Subject: Re: Inactive players Mr. Shumway: How will your "solution" help people get rid of games with the inactive players? << < 1 2 3 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |