User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: rod03801 
 Feature requests

Do you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board!
If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board.

For further information about Feature Requests, please visit this link on the Brainking.Info site : http://brainking.info/archives/20-About-feature-requests.html


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Knight.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220   > >>
23. February 2005, 22:20:50
Stevie 
fencer, me, summertop, grenv
not just me thank you.


Moderator: bumble, MidnightMcMedic, cariad, red dragon, rod03801

they are the normal mods on here..theyve been on and were happy with it.

23. February 2005, 22:19:31
harley 
"participating in a conversation" - that would mean more than just you, unless you were talking to yourself. I was requesting the convo about ponds be taken to the appropriate board. To everyone. Not just you.

23. February 2005, 22:17:05
Stevie 
Subject: Re: Re:
harley: NO we are discussing a feature we would like.

So why only say it to me eh????

23. February 2005, 22:12:18
Maxxina 
Grenv : easy solution , write to all members who are playing first round , please bid 11 or more :)

23. February 2005, 22:11:29
harley 
Subject: Re:
Stevie: It started out as a feature request, but had moved on to a discussion about ponds.

23. February 2005, 22:02:06
Stevie 
LMAO

23. February 2005, 22:00:44
grenv 
Subject: Re:
Modified by grenv (23. February 2005, 22:01:05)
harley: Originally it was my feature request. Now I have another: Please use the following code for anyone bidding zero.

< a href="electricShock">Click here to bid zero< /a>

23. February 2005, 21:58:11
Stevie 
ummmm Harley...its a feature request

23. February 2005, 19:59:20
harley 
Stevie, you're complaining the BK.com board is off topic, then participate in an off topic conversation here!

This is one for the ponds board, please.

23. February 2005, 19:11:08
Stevie 
My god summertop has got it LOL
We have been asking for a while now mate..but Fencer wont budge an inch :o(

23. February 2005, 18:57:36
Summertop 
Subject: Re: I'll try again each time until I at least get a response...
grenv: Ah, I get it. Just look at the list of players. If there is a pawn, just bid one more. That goes on until the pawn FINALLY drops into the pond. But, in theory, doing that would force the pawn to drop in the pond the very next round...What would be nice, then, is a way to resign from a ponds game.

23. February 2005, 18:38:27
grenv 
Subject: Re: I'll try again each time until I at least get a response...
Summertop: There's no such thing as timeout, if you don't move you get last turn's move.

Problem is that in the first run there is a pawn bidding 10 each turn. Therefore 90% of players just bid 11. Each turn someone bids 0 in an effort to drop out of the game, which prolongs the agony. If we didn't have the perpetual 10 bid it would be more interesting (even though the zeros would still usually mess us up).

23. February 2005, 18:27:38
Summertop 
Subject: Re: I'll try again each time until I at least get a response...
Summertop: I know, I know, Since I don't often play ponds why am I even talking about it...because I can. If a player times out, they don't automatically fall into the pond. They just keep using their last bid. Since the (now) Pawn can't access the game, shouldn't they just timeout like everyone else?

23. February 2005, 18:22:47
grenv 
Subject: Re: I'll try again each time until I at least get a response...
Fencer: I guess you can be circular if you like, but saying you won't change a rule because it's a rule doesn't actually answer the question.

23. February 2005, 18:21:17
Summertop 
Subject: Re: I'll try again each time until I at least get a response...
Fencer: LOL

23. February 2005, 18:18:45
Fencer 
Subject: Re: I'll try again each time until I at least get a response...
grenv: Because it's the rule.

23. February 2005, 18:17:16
grenv 
Subject: Re: I'll try again each time until I at least get a response...
Fencer: Why not? It spoils the game? Is it just time to code? Surely they should just be forced to bid zero or something. How hard could it be?

23. February 2005, 18:13:00
Stevie 
Unlike all other games on Brainking :o(...ones already started can be played off in full

23. February 2005, 18:12:29
Hrqls 
Subject: Re: I'll try again each time until I at least get a response...
Summertop: they will keep bidding their last bid (which they made as a paying member) and then fall in when they are the lowest bid

23. February 2005, 18:12:05
Fencer 
Subject: Re: I'll try again each time until I at least get a response...
Summertop: He can do only automatic generated moves.

23. February 2005, 18:10:59
Summertop 
Subject: Re: I'll try again each time until I at least get a response...
Fencer: Just curious. I don't really play ponds, but what does happen when a paying member reverts back to pawn status while they have a ponds game going?

23. February 2005, 17:43:37
Fencer 
Subject: Re: I'll try again each time until I at least get a response...
grenv: No.

23. February 2005, 17:40:45
grenv 
Subject: I'll try again each time until I at least get a response...
Fencer,

PLEASE allow pawns to finish ponds they signed up for while being paying members. It spoils the game otherwise.

alternative: All pawns autobid zero, that way they are out of the way.

I don't mind which solution, but it should be one or the other.

Thanks.

23. February 2005, 09:16:25
Fencer 
Subject: Re: red numbers
bwildman: It will be implemented later.

23. February 2005, 06:25:12
bwildman 
Subject: red numbers
Fencer...I know this was brought up before...but when a person is compelled to put someone on hide...can it elliminate the red numbers from that person?

23. February 2005, 05:18:26
Vikings 
Subject: Re: how about game variations based on the concept of +2 players per game...
nobleheart: the first multiplayer game was introduced about 2 months age, but you have to be a paying member to play it

23. February 2005, 04:48:51
nobleheart 
Subject: how about game variations based on the concept of +2 players per game...
..I would like to know how many people enjoy a game with more than one opponent.there are many examples,even in chess.

23. February 2005, 03:00:25
grenv 
Subject: Re: Re:
Daniel Snyder: But you appear not to have played any games!!! I have played 250 and have a reasonable rating. I can guarantee that white has an advantage very early in the game. Black is on the defensive from move 1.

It may not be enough to force a win, but it is much easier to make a mistake as black.

23. February 2005, 02:40:05
Orlandu 
Subject: Re:
grenv: Atomic chess seems to have no advantage... White or Black... Play a few good moves on either side and the game is over...

22. February 2005, 20:49:43
Hrqls 
hmm ... 3 in a line is on a small board ... 4 in a line on a big board with a limitation .. 5 in a line on a big board without limitation .. what about 6 in a line on a 3 dimensional board without limitations ? ;)

22. February 2005, 19:51:18
grenv 
Serious request.

Atomic Chess has the slight drawback that white gains an early advantage due to how quickly the king can be attacked. I propose an 8x10 board, 8 wide as normal, with normal pieces, but 10 deep. This should make for a more circumspect game.

22. February 2005, 19:42:02
bwildman 
how about double 4 in a line? the object being getting 4 in a line twice to win?

22. February 2005, 15:11:15
Stevie 
you both forgot the cherry on top

22. February 2005, 15:09:38
MidnightMcMedic 
Subject: Re: Request: (Crazy) Dark Screen Chess
AbigailII: ... on a 20X20 board with equal number of moves as to pieces your opponent has left!

LOL

22. February 2005, 14:42:29
AbigailII 
Subject: Re: Request: (Crazy) Dark Screen Chess
Modified by AbigailII (22. February 2005, 14:42:55)
reza: Dark crazy gothic three-checks fortress Fisher random anti extinction cylinder loop marahadja screen chess? With a doubling cube. Supersized.

22. February 2005, 11:12:42
Expired 
Subject: Re: Request: (Crazy) Dark Screen Chess
BIG BAD WOLF: Dark crazy screen chess is a lot unfair and quite to white's advantage. I bring up my idea of DARK CYLINDER CHESS :-)

22. February 2005, 09:59:08
Hrqls 
Subject: Re: move and go to
Fencer: lol .. blame it on me being blonde :) i didnt think of the back button *slap forehead* i sometimes even go via the main page to make sure i dont hit the wrong button

plaintiger also just mentioned to me i could use the back button :)

thanks .. i will from now on :)

22. February 2005, 09:57:59
Fencer 
Subject: Re: move and go to
Hrqls: Why do you use the cancel button anyway? Clicking on browser's back button is much faster and safer, in this particular case.

22. February 2005, 09:55:16
Hrqls 
Subject: move and go to
i often try out a move (in froglet and anti-froglet) to see the results, and then click on 'cancel this move' if the results are not what i expected

occassionally i click on 'move and go to' by accident though :(

could please there be a way to disable this button ? (maybe via settings) ?

21. February 2005, 17:53:48
Hrqls 
Subject: Re: Ponds
grenv: but when its done .. please inform us ;)

21. February 2005, 16:05:40
grenv 
Subject: Ponds
Fencer,

PLEASE allow pawns to finish ponds they signed up for while being paying members. It spoils the game otherwise.

alternative: All pawns autobid zero, that way they are out of the way.

I don't mind which solution, but it should be one or the other.

Thanks.

21. February 2005, 12:06:50
AbigailII 
Subject: Tournament starting dates
Modified by AbigailII (21. February 2005, 12:10:06)
It would be nice if the tournament standing pages (the ones on
http: //brainking.com/game/Tournaments?trg={NUMBER}&
;tri={NUMBER} page)
mentioned the date the tournament started. I know that you can go to one of the games and see when the game started, but it would be nice to have it along the other tournament info.

I also would like to have the option to list the tournaments mentioned on the profile page to be listed by starting date/time. Listing them by ID means they are listed in the order the tournaments were created, which, IMO, is less useful.

20. February 2005, 22:55:14
coan.net 
Subject: Re: Request: (Crazy) Dark Screen Chess
Seravajan: I know Fencer does not really like making variants of variants, but I would second a Crazy Dark Screen Chees variant. (Don't think we need both Screen & Crazy Screen dark variants - and since regular screen chess is the least popular game on the site, don't think we need a dark variant of the regular screen chess.)

Just thinking about the game, I would think white would have a good advantage - giving a lot more importance of placing the bishops & rooks to be able to view as much of the opponents opening as possible.

Anyway, I know Fencer is some-what against making variants of variants, but this would be fun - plus should not be too hard to program.

20. February 2005, 22:35:26
Seravajan 
Subject: Request: (Crazy) Dark Screen Chess
Due this mess with program and cheating I repost my request for Dark Screen Chess and the Crazy Dark Screen Chess. The first one is a combination of Dark Chess and Screen Chess. The later of Dark and Crazy Screen Chess.

BTW: These games would completely making any program cheating impossible!

20. February 2005, 22:06:29
coan.net 
Subject: Re: geez rod
chupacabraVS2: I believe rod's comment about the conversation that does not belong here is about using a program in games - not the scrabble/jamble conversation.

20. February 2005, 21:20:08
nobleheart 
Subject: Re: Re:itsyourturn
JennyElizabeth: thanks jenny,its nice to know about jamble.the problem is,there are 3 user profiles on this computer.
one of them has a login name on www.itsyourturn.com allready,
so I cant create an account there.that site has an inflexible rule about only allowing one login account per IP address.I know several people who hav run into this problem.thanks again anyway.

20. February 2005, 20:29:23
rod03801 
This conversation doesn't belong here anymore! All further posts on this will be deleted. Thank you for cooperating!

20. February 2005, 18:13:07
Walter Montego 
Subject: Re: Where to discuss cheating and computers
Mousetrap: I can forgive and forget. It is hard to follow the stream of conversation on a site such as this. Even if one notices the time stamps, it doesn't mean that a reponse is out of line if it comes weeks later. The subject itself is not an easy one to solve, and using examples in some of the arguments has made a casual reader or two think the discussion should be held in various different discussion boards. Where it's at now seems to be a good place (BrainKing.com) and it appears that it's dwindling down as we've all had a say or two about it and will just have to move on without being able to do much about it except understand each other's point of view concerning it.

20. February 2005, 17:46:25
Mousetrap 
Subject: Re: Where to discuss cheating and computers
Walter Montego:
Well forgive me but I was,nt here hours ago!

20. February 2005, 17:39:49
Walter Montego 
Subject: Re: Where to discuss cheating and computers
Mousetrap: Huh? :) Your post confuses me and we all went to a different board 11 hours ago.

<< <   211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top