 |
|
 Feature requestsDo you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board! If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board. For further information about Feature Requests, please visit this link on the Brainking.Info site : http://brainking.info/archives/20-About-feature-requests.html You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Knight. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 > >> 16. January 2006, 12:31:39 Subject: Re: Light shed on dark games  WhiteTower: I am not sure if informing on a regular basis would make much sense because in most cases it would contain only "I don't want to reveal this behind-the-scenes issue because it's too complicated to explain" :-) 16. January 2006, 08:30:20 Subject: Re: Light shed on dark games IndiagonalJones: In other words, nothing can be seen only in black and white. International Checkers is a great and interesting game, no doubt, and I definitely want to add it. But it is still a game which affects only one group of BrainKing users. The site stability and performance is always my highest priority because it affects all users. I don't say there are serious performance problems at the moment but there are minor issues which could become serious performance problems in the future, that's why they must be resolved as soon as possible. 16. January 2006, 07:19:24 Subject: Re: Czuch Chuckers: Yes, it would be difficult. 16. January 2006, 07:18:29 Subject: Re: Light shed on dark games IndiagonalJones: I think you may loose many Europeen players of international checkers as it's already implanted on IYT and they will prefer play there
Don't believe that.  12. January 2006, 17:46:44 Subject: Re: Light shed on dark games playBunny: Well, that's a risk. 12. January 2006, 17:38:23 Subject: Re: dark games mr. shumway: How could an opponent see your battleboats setup? 5. January 2006, 19:02:09 Subject: Re: reza: And how would you explain people how to read the phonetic symbols? 2. January 2006, 08:49:15 Subject: Re: About International checkers jolat: The rules are more complicated, e.g. you must capture as many pieces as possible, etc. The current checkers model is not prepared for this rule, it must be reworked first. 2. January 2006, 07:52:43 Subject: Re: start date on games emmett: The start date can be found at the game notation column. 22. December 2005, 21:12:02 Subject: Re: Eriisa: Yes but the one who accepts bets must have a licence for it, otherwise it's illegal. 22. December 2005, 18:24:21 That's it. That's why there will be no money winning. You can win Brains but it is only a virtual currency and can be used only on BrainKing, nowhere else. Or you can win a t-shirt or a membership. 21. December 2005, 21:31:32 Yes, this idea with Brains has been wandering through my mind for a long time.  Something will be done next year.
But no gambling, no real money winning, of course. It would be illegal in our country as well. 20. December 2005, 11:16:36 Many things are planned for the next year. I am just taking a rest. 18. December 2005, 21:41:17 Subject: Re: Refactoring alanback: The changes in the view are tightly related to the refacroring process. 18. December 2005, 19:32:31 Subject: Re: a little settings problem alanback: It's a programmer's word. 18. December 2005, 12:28:20 Subject: Re: a little settings problem rabbitoid: The whole BrainKing view layer will be refactored next year. 15. December 2005, 19:16:13 Subject: Re: 'Type of game' on the tournament page TC: What do you mean by "fails 'type of game' column"? 15. December 2005, 07:22:41 Subject: Re: streaks Thad: What do you mean by a "streak"? 14. December 2005, 21:24:41 Subject: Re: Espionage Summertop: Yes, I am still planning that. It must have been postponed due to more important events. 14. December 2005, 07:34:44 Subject: Re: Turn off game chat alanback: Put him to the blocked users. 11. December 2005, 20:46:50 Subject: Re: Small Espionage Marfitalu: Oh yes, sure. 11. December 2005, 20:21:44 Subject: Re: Greek backgammon - update? Marfitalu: What board? 10. December 2005, 17:34:49 Subject: Re: Froglet-Variant... (again and again...) WhiteTower: Well, actually I started to implement it just after the post of diogenes, otherwise I would postpone it to January, at least. 10. December 2005, 13:00:11 Subject: Re: Froglet-Variant... (again and again...) diogenes: Sphere Froglet. 9. December 2005, 16:50:15 Subject: Re: Tournament lists tinksbell: Profile, for example? 5. December 2005, 22:58:08 Subject: Re: Logout link playBunny: My stats show that it's far below ShowGame, ShowMove and DoMove actions. 4. December 2005, 21:00:20 Subject: Re: Rename users mctrivia: But many users put silly names even to the "first name" and "last name" fields. 4. December 2005, 20:17:04 Subject: Re: Rename users mctrivia: Some real names are very loooooong and it wouldn't look nice in the game table. That's why the user name length is limited to 15 letters. 2. December 2005, 06:52:39 Subject: Re: Connection game: Havannah Fwiffo: Christian Freeling had also suggested Dameo which is, as he said, one of his most interesting games. 2. December 2005, 06:51:36 Subject: Re: mctrivia: You can put it to your favourite boards. 1. December 2005, 08:13:07 Subject: Re: Gender mctrivia: This is trivial in English but can be more complicated in other languages. It won't be changed. 29. November 2005, 20:50:20 Subject: Re: Software Program mctrivia: I've been already thinking about creating a rich cross-platform client with several different profiles (cell phones, PDAs, Java desktop application) but, as you said, it's a time consuming job. I'll think it over. 29. November 2005, 13:11:27 Subject: Re: meaningful BKR formulas WhiteTower: Not yet. 29. November 2005, 08:32:37 Subject: Re: meaningful BKR formulas mctrivia: I've sent you a message, I don't want to start another discussion of this kind on this board. 29. November 2005, 08:04:54 Subject: Re: meaningful BKR formulas Thad: Don't play rated games then. Who is not satisfied here, can play elsewhere. But I won't change the formula anyway, it's pointless to spit on it.21. November 2005, 22:11:28 Subject: Re: Site connection problems wellywales: No site is able to do it if it's unreachable due to a network problem. 21. November 2005, 22:07:52 Subject: Re: Site connection problems wellywales: If there is a network or a connection problem, you couldn't reach the fault page anyway. It would make no sense. 21. November 2005, 19:19:48 Subject: Re: google ad sense and timeouts alanback: Now it does.
Jason: Just below the banners. 21. November 2005, 18:40:26 Subject: Re: google ad sense and timeouts Modified by Fencer (21. November 2005, 18:40:46) votacommunista: Paying members can disable Google ads, click on the "hide" link. 17. November 2005, 06:51:38 Subject: Re: Message board link Vikings: What revised message board? 15. November 2005, 21:46:05 Subject: Re: Random dices Andersp: This is a joke, isn't it? 8. November 2005, 07:36:53 Subject: Re: Title element for username in game list WhiteTower: Huh? 7. November 2005, 22:44:40 Subject: Re: Viewing opponent's vacation table alanback: Yes, it's the last day of her vacation. 7. November 2005, 22:41:45 Subject: Re: Viewing opponent's vacation table alanback: Look at this profile, for example. 7. November 2005, 22:39:37 Subject: Re: Viewing opponent's vacation table alanback: On the player's profile. 7. November 2005, 22:35:58 Subject: Re: Viewing opponent's vacation table alanback: Only the vacation for the future days. Not today or in the past. << < 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |