User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: rod03801 
 Feature requests

Do you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board!
If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board.

For further information about Feature Requests, please visit this link on the Brainking.Info site : http://brainking.info/archives/20-About-feature-requests.html


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Knight.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115   > >>
8. January 2005, 23:32:14
Goonerg 
Subject: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: descrambler feature??

9. January 2005, 00:16:10
Czuch 
LOL, correct, no more feature, unless you pay....

9. January 2005, 05:06:47
Vikings 
would it be possible to make bids a couple of turns in advance in around the pond?

9. January 2005, 17:55:05
grenv 
"Accept All" and "Accept all by this player" buttons.

9. January 2005, 17:57:34
grenv 
or at least buttons above the fold. Click, scroll, click is not very efficient. How about an option to have all buttons above the gameboard?

9. January 2005, 17:58:04
Rose 
Subject: Re:
grenv: Oh yes, ditto. Those would b nice. I have some friends who send more then one game invite at a time. Or some days I log on to find 10 game invites. It would be great to accept all at once!

9. January 2005, 18:21:48
Eriisa 
Subject: Re: Re:
Rose: what? and not get to savor each one.... one by one???? LMBO


9. January 2005, 18:26:44
Rose 
Subject: Re: Re:
Eriisa: Well there is that aspect of it isn't there? LOL

9. January 2005, 18:28:56
Eriisa 
Subject: Re: Re:
Rose: LOL! I just couldn't resist that reply!

9. January 2005, 18:58:18
Chimera 
Subject: Notepad
Would it be possible to have some way to rearrange things we have saved in our notepad. So we could group some together or put others on the top or bottom.

9. January 2005, 19:02:25
ScarletRose 
Subject: Re: Notepad
Modified by ScarletRose (9. January 2005, 20:47:13)
volant: only way to do that now is to pretend each notepad is a folder..

One is for recipes for instance, another for stories (such as the one I am writing at Fantasy Island).

I just keep adding to them.. and separate the entries with something like this..
***********

9. January 2005, 19:08:11
Chimera 
Subject: Re: Notepad
ScarletRose: thanks that's a great idea i will try it.

9. January 2005, 19:54:19
Andersp 
Subject: Accept all
Fencer has said yes to an "accept all" feature. Still waiting

9. January 2005, 21:10:01
ScarletRose 
Subject: Is there a way to put a symbol next
to the pond games that have already met their maxium sign up??

9. January 2005, 23:56:41
Bernice 
Subject: Re: Is there a way to put a symbol next
ScarletRose:
good idea....im sick of clicking on ponds and seeing i cant join...a "full" sign would be good or even the "number" signed

10. January 2005, 03:16:43
coan.net 
Subject: Re: Is there a way to put a symbol next
Pond Game: Or do this:

In the current "Minimum number of players" column, put "Min/Max players" - and then include the numbers like 16/20 - for 16 min, and then 20 max.

Then in the current "Maximum number of players", Put "Players signed so far"

That way you can see at a quick glace how many are currently signed up and without taking up any extra room.

10. January 2005, 03:46:14
Purple 
Subject: Fencer
I tried to transfer ownership of the FS Our Place to Slam with the result that I am no longer Big Boss but neither is he. There is a similar problem with Ask Dr. Purple where he is listed as Big Boss but has no functions. These are private fellowships. Can you advise?

10. January 2005, 04:00:42
ScarletRose 
Subject: Re: Is there a way to put a symbol next
BIG BAD WOLF: I was meaning on the main pond page link.. that way you wouldn't have to go into each individual game.. to find they are full..

10. January 2005, 04:01:20
Stevie 
Subject: Re: Fencer
Purple: is that a feature request? LOL

10. January 2005, 04:04:07
coan.net 
ScarletRose - That is what I'm talking about also. Instead of just seeng "Full", my way we could see how close it is to being full also.

Purple - There is a limit of 2 fellowships now in effect - could this limit be causing your problems?

10. January 2005, 04:06:27
ScarletRose 
Subject: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: Oh okay.. I see it now.. silly me.. :)

10. January 2005, 04:08:44
Purple 
Subject: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: very possible but I was trying to divest..not add on.

10. January 2005, 04:12:13
Walter Montego 
Subject: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: Could you explain this limit? I'm not member of any fellowships, but I'd like am explanation of this limit and when it came about. Does it effect how many one can join? Or be the Big Boss of? What happens to people that are already over the limit? Is the limit temporary or permanent? Why was it instituted? When will it be rescinded? Even though I'm not a member of a fellowship, it seems like a lessening of the service if I'm now restricted when I never even used it. Do I get some other thing as compensation?

10. January 2005, 04:15:52
Stevie 
Subject: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: But you still have three ;o)

10. January 2005, 04:16:15
coan.net 
There is a new limit of 2 fellowship to be BIG BOSS (create/run). It's only for new fellowships. If a person already runs more then 2, that is allowed (grandfathered in), but will no longer be able to have more then 2.

There is still no limit for the number you can join.

10. January 2005, 04:20:01
Stevie 
LOL very convenient eh . who said that extra part then?

10. January 2005, 04:25:50
Walter Montego 
Subject: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: We joined three days apart almost two years ago. Why should you get a better deal than me? Where's my grandfather clause? Doesn't seem right or fair to me. And you didn't answer my question as to why this is being done. It does sound like it's being done permanently though.

10. January 2005, 04:30:46
coan.net 
Modified by coan.net (10. January 2005, 04:31:44)
First: Actually no one said anything about a grandfather clause but me - as a way to exaplin how it is a NEW rule that is now in place.

Second: If Fencer says that he wants everyone back below 2 fellowships, I will then get rid of 1 - no problems from me.

Third: Why was it done? (my guess) is that some people had started creating many fellowships, which could have been easily combined into 1 or 2. I believe it was done to stop the possible abuse that can happen. (There was one incedent where a person create 3-4 fellowship all for the same purpose, but was asked to get rid of some and they did - which is probable a reason.)

Walter - If you have more then 2 fellowships, you also are allowed to keep them for now - unless told otherwise - I have been given no extra deal or anything.

10. January 2005, 04:44:44
pgt 
Subject: Fellowships
Walter Montego: Walter, I don't intend to start any new fellowships, so feel free to start a couple under my name if you like

10. January 2005, 04:56:08
Walter Montego 
Subject: Re: Fellowships
pgt: I don't intend to join or form any either, but it still seems like something is being taken from me. Maybe it's just a preception problem on my part. I'm getting penalized for the actions of others. Why not reward us people that don't cause problems instead of lowering the service because of the idiots that make trouble?

10. January 2005, 05:13:52
pgt 
Subject: Re: Fellowships
Walter Montego: Gosh, Walter : Keep this up and you'll have me believing that you're serious

10. January 2005, 09:02:33
Fencer 
Have a look at Pond page.
About fellowships - yes, it's exactly like BBW describes. There is probably some small bug with Big Boss transfer under these circumstances.

10. January 2005, 10:12:17
red dragon 
A grandfather clause? What happened to the Santa clause? Is there a sanity clause?

10. January 2005, 10:52:37
cariad 
I hate to be the one to break the news but there is no sanity clause.

10. January 2005, 10:55:23
pgt 
Subject: Re:
cariad:Don't talk rubbish! You'll be saying there's no Santa Claus next!

10. January 2005, 10:56:29
Fencer 
Ehm, ehm.

10. January 2005, 11:05:26
cariad 
Is that a 'Fencer ehm, ehm'? Sort of a muted 'Fencer answer'?

10. January 2005, 11:47:43
Hrqls 
oh my! fencer is being strangled by elves!

(oops this is probably off topic ;))

11. January 2005, 01:53:52
Eriisa 
Fencer, The pond page looks great

*pats self on back for staying on topic and not mentioning that Santa even was tried the insanity clause.*

11. January 2005, 11:29:36
Hrqls 
Subject: teddy bears
could we have a teddy bear emoticon ?? please ??

11. January 2005, 11:30:07
Fencer 
Subject: Re: teddy bears
Hrqls: Can you provide it?

11. January 2005, 11:31:57
Hrqls 
will have a look :)

11. January 2005, 11:43:51
Hrqls 
a quick search lead me to :
http://msn.mess.be/categories.php?cat_id=23

2 from the selection :
http://msn.mess.be/data/media/23/teddy1_ns.gif
http://msn.mess.be/data/media/23/teddy2_ns.gif

another category has some as well (maybe other categories as well :))
http://msn.mess.be/categories.php?cat_id=30

another site :
http://www.msnemotions.org/avatar/326.Teddy-bear-love.html

on this site are a lot of links to the metoyou bears
http://www.metoyou.startbewijs.nl/

on that site these are nice but might a bit too large, i dont know if they can be resized :)
http://be.msnusers.com/Thetattyteddypage/snowfun.msnw

11. January 2005, 11:57:57
Fencer 
Code 54.

11. January 2005, 12:02:00
Hrqls 
you are my :)

11. January 2005, 12:26:24
Dresden 
Modified by Dresden (11. January 2005, 12:28:52)
The teddy still has a white background.

11. January 2005, 12:35:41
Fencer 
No more.

11. January 2005, 14:56:27
Chimera 
Subject: Re:
Fencer:

11. January 2005, 15:20:40
rabbitoid 
Subject: Re:
Fencer: how about permitting user defined emoticons? upload small gif files to info@... then you assign them a number

12. January 2005, 02:15:33
Czuch 
Subject: Re: Fellowships
Walter Montego: I hear you...

I had a couple of fellowships I wanted to start recently, and didnt because I knew Fencer was going to limit them son, and didnt want to waste the time just to get it taken away. I know other people gave away fellowships before the change because they wanted to start a new one but didnt want to go over the limit of 2.

I think that anyone with a rook membership created before the rule change should continue with the same benefits that we signed up with. We should all be grand fathered, and impliment the rule for new and renewed memberships from this point on.

Either that or only allow 2 for everybody regardless.

When you pay, you sign up for all the available options, and they shouldnt be taken away during that membership period.

<< <   106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top