 |
|
 ChessChess Discussion For posting: - invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu or go straight to the Chess Invitation) - information about upcoming tournaments - discussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position ... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted) - links to interesting related sites (non-promotional) You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
27. March 2019, 15:10:32 Subject: Re: Notation Modified by Nothingness (27. March 2019, 15:11:37)  Walter Montego: to me its much simpler to use for the same reasons you give for algebraic.. Algebraic too confusing to me.. I cant visualize the board with algebraic. I need to see the "X" for a capture which isn't present in algebraic. when I see something in notation for example E4,, what is moving to E4? I need to see "P" 9. February 2019, 03:57:31 Subject: Notation Modified by Nothingness (9. February 2019, 03:57:56) am I the only person who still uses descriptive notation. I really still after over 40 years playing chess still find algebraic horrible. P-k4 forever 12. April 2010, 17:03:52 yes it is very complicated using the letters and numbers of the ranks and files. e4 tells me nothing. where as P-Q4 tells me exactly what was moved and where to. e4 is too vague what moved to E4? 11. April 2010, 23:19:54 Subject: chesss notation I was asking a few years ago to get a form of notation that i am familiar with. i dont use any of the version that we use here on BK. the one i use is : P-K4 P-K4 2. B-B4 N-kb3 3 P-kR4 ect... i never could get the other versions... what is up with this.? |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |