 |
|
 Chess variants (8x8)including Amazon, Anti, Atomic, Berolina, Corner, Crazy Screen, Cylinder, Dark, Extinction, Fischer Random, Fortress, Horde, Knight Relay, Legan, Loop, Maharajah, Screen, Three Checks For posting: - invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu) - information about upcoming tournaments - discussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position ... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted) - links to interesting related sites (non-promotional) Community Announcements: - Nasmichael is helping to co-ordinate the Fischer Random Chess Email Chess (FRCEC) Club and can set up quad or trio games if you send him a PM here. You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
1. July 2005, 22:05:09 Subject: Re: thai chess Fencer: yes - that's how it's called
on chess variants dot com - just checked ... ~*~ 30. June 2005, 21:28:39 Subject: thai chess anyone seen that variation ?
all pawns are one step ahead in start position - saw an article in the eurpa rochade magazine. ~*~ 15. May 2005, 21:19:35 Subject: Re: infinite move numbers ? rabbitoid: you expressed it much better by pointing that a piece
must move to an un-occupied square - I enjoy to see the group intelligence which is even higher than mine is lightly capable of fixing the prob ... ~*~ .  15. May 2005, 02:52:39 Subject: Re: passing a move ? Modified by danoschek (15. May 2005, 03:02:07) Walter Montego: yes you don't see. like I don't see the admittably
challenging boardlogic complying with chess rules either ... btw it was me who urged to repairing the en passant cross the border too - fixed already ... ~*~ . 15. May 2005, 01:10:37 Subject: Re: infinite move numbers ? Modified by danoschek (15. May 2005, 01:11:54) Sumerian: actually the logic is violated beyond too, I agree ...
I assume we both know the chess riddles that challenge one to reconstruct the history of a game by a given end position ... ~*~ 15. May 2005, 00:56:18 Subject: Re: passing a move ? Sumerian: indeed it would theoretically suspend stalemate as well ... it's humbug. ~*~ 15. May 2005, 00:44:19 Subject: yeah halma and next bowling eh ? it's chess - you all might have forgotten ... ~*~ 14. May 2005, 15:22:15 Subject: Re: Re: rabbitoid: checkers oogh ... still the position has changed ... it's a flaw period ~*~ 14. May 2005, 14:11:14 Subject: Re: Re: reza: Ra5-a5 is no legitimate MOVE - you are absolutely right - a move has
a start square and a different destination square, that is its definition ... ~*~ 21. March 2005, 20:20:04 Subject: Re: ooops :D WhisperzQ: eheh !
hard to explain ... don't you think this single knight unveiling the weakness of joined forces is pure beauty ?  .. ~*~20. March 2005, 17:00:35 Subject: Re: ooops :D WhisperzQ: sorry I meant
'pure pattern' thanks for correcting ... ~*~ 17. March 2005, 01:22:30 Subject: ooops :D settings changed ...  ... - and I too think three
boards could go as one fisher/corner/fortress that is ... last not least, avoiding chessfree bubbles,here a cornergame with a pure mate ... ~*~ 14. March 2005, 19:15:08 Subject: oh right we have no fisherboard yet ... :) Modified by danoschek (14. March 2005, 19:17:04) http://brainking.com/game/ArchivedGame?g=125085
I can't fully compete with the beauty of your pattern, but okay - effective as well ... . ~*~15. February 2005, 21:08:19 Subject: Re: Janus verses Gothic Modified by danoschek (15. February 2005, 21:08:54) mahavrilla: I believe that tempered capablanca chess appears
to have a higher potential than janus ... but the majority of games here doesn't reflect all the strategic options properly, coffeehouse style mainly. ~*~ 14. February 2005, 01:44:00 Subject: Re: evolving chess beyond random mahavrilla: I do have. Similar thoughts
have been expressend in 8 decades without the doom coming indeed. Creativity will prevail. ~*~ 6. February 2005, 05:43:36 Subject: Re: A thought. bobwhoosta: I second ...  ... ~*~30. January 2005, 01:08:22 Subject: redsales looking forward.  your call
and don't forget - any "invincible" position
for black can't be too bad for white either ...  ... ... ~*~25. July 2004, 05:48:12 Subject: well redsales, let me bet Modified by danoschek (25. July 2004, 05:49:57) if you'd have had one, for sure the same position would be not worse for white. *grin* ~*~ 8. July 2004, 20:30:07 Subject: crazy screen chess setup poker Modified by danoschek (8. July 2004, 20:35:48) there's a probability ot 12.5 % that white mates
an opponent with average setup in only 4 moves. ~*~ 4. August 2003, 09:33:56 Subject: hey you pouty ... and what about atomic
and the merciless whispering ? grrrr :P ~*~ |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Moderator: 
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |