Uzanta Nomo: Pasvorto:
Nova Uzanta Registrado
Moderatoro: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Mesaĝoj en paĝo:
Listo de diskutaj forumoj
Vi ne rajtas afiŝi mesaĝojn en ĉi tiu forumo. La minimuma necesa nivelo de la membreco por afiŝi mesaĝojn en ĉi tiu forumo estas Brain-Kavaliro.
Moduso: Ĉiu rajtas sendi
Serĉi en mesaĝoj:  

<< <   1 2 3 4 5   > >>
3. Decembro 2004, 03:32:28
Purple 
Just change it. A long as it's not obscene or taken it goes right through.

30. Novembro 2004, 21:05:07
Purple 
WTG Rooster. Now that is something to crow about.

30. Novembro 2004, 01:09:55
Purple 
OK Flooz but it's fairly good natured up to now. :)

26. Novembro 2004, 03:13:35
Purple 
When someone is in trouble there are always people who fancy themselves a Roman Emperor to give thumbs up or thumbs down. Maybe it inflates their own self-importance. This seems like a Brainking related topic Flooz..enforcement of site guidelines. If you think it isn't then I will drop it.

26. Novembro 2004, 02:32:31
Purple 
Temo: Re: This board
Slam is Brainking.

26. Novembro 2004, 01:39:10
Purple 
Temo: Re:
No one is going to rat him out

26. Novembro 2004, 01:32:13
Purple 
Temo: Re:
Only Fencer knows how long the ban is for. He can re-instate him tomorrow and no one will think he was over lenient.

25. Novembro 2004, 18:47:55
Purple 
Temo: Re:
Amnesty International

25. Novembro 2004, 18:27:05
Purple 
I would like to suggest and request than Slam be re-instated on the grounds that one..he is really sorry and won't do it again and two..others have done similar or worse and not suffered the same consequences. I think the deterrant effect has been served. Just my opinion.

25. Novembro 2004, 00:36:52
Purple 
Temo: Re:
Go to membership on your main page. It explains it. I think a 6 months Rook is $20..could be wrong because that Euro is too damned complicated.

25. Novembro 2004, 00:29:06
Purple 
Temo: Re:
Rook or Knight? Rook is much the best bargain IMHO

17. Novembro 2004, 17:09:18
Purple 
Temo: Re: bad words
Ok Bwild..I assume you used lighter fluid. Now step two. Light up a cigar.

17. Novembro 2004, 16:52:48
Purple 
Temo: Re: bad words
I recommend gargling with lighter fluid or bleach for Bwildman. :0)

17. Novembro 2004, 16:44:30
Purple 
Temo: Re:
I don't think Fencer banned Slam for bad language and now is going to turn around and let others start using it.

16. Novembro 2004, 13:43:47
Purple 
Bad try. Fencer is able to check everything anyone sends including me. Think of something else.

9. Novembro 2004, 21:33:47
Purple 
Temo: Re:
Case of guts from Ugh

4. Novembro 2004, 21:31:58
Purple 
I notice some Halma players have drawn games. How can a game of Halma possibly draw?

4. Novembro 2004, 00:13:19
Purple 
Temo: Re: Hmmmm?...board moderating?
RANTS and RAVES

3. Novembro 2004, 04:01:26
Purple 
Temo: Re:
Well said Long John

2. Novembro 2004, 17:13:50
Purple 
Temo: Re:
Sure but it hasn't gotten Slam restored yet.

2. Novembro 2004, 17:10:06
Purple 
Temo: Re:
These are attempted posts by hidden users. They are hidden for extreme pornography an are still trying to post.

31. Oktobro 2004, 21:24:24
Purple 
Temo: Re: Jokes
Look again. My webtv is very slow

31. Oktobro 2004, 18:08:03
Purple 
Temo: Re: Re:
In the Navy at Officer's Candidate School during brigade drill many of us were told we were slower than Hogan's Goat. Everybody pretended like they knew what it meant. It has to mean something. :)

31. Oktobro 2004, 18:01:34
Purple 
Temo: Re:
Old people know it. LOL. (American saying)

31. Oktobro 2004, 17:57:15
Purple 
Temo: Re:
My webtv is slower than Hogan's goat. All three sites.

30. Oktobro 2004, 16:30:01
Purple 
Temo: Re: Happy Halloween
I was thinking of dressing up as a cowboy but that is so lame. :P

30. Oktobro 2004, 16:17:24
Purple 
Temo: Happy Halloween
The 120 members of Purple World wish a Happy Halloween to all those who celebrate it.

27. Oktobro 2004, 17:40:29
Purple 
Temo: Re: Interview with....
Modifita de Purple (27. Oktobro 2004, 20:42:38)
[edited]

23. Oktobro 2004, 16:14:21
Purple 
Temo: Re: IMupChucKing
Kevin is solid and has been all along.

21. Oktobro 2004, 21:44:06
Purple 
Temo: Re:
But now Brainking has a new generation of bad boys which gives meaning to the empty lives of the bullies who love to have someone to use to get the attention off of themselves. LOL

21. Oktobro 2004, 21:37:53
Purple 
Temo: Re:
Modifita de Purple (21. Oktobro 2004, 22:40:22)
..of which you knew nothing. AS IF

21. Oktobro 2004, 21:25:31
Purple 
Temo: Re:
Hey the KM only did that to predators, programmers and pedophiles. And only then when we saw one of those going in for the kill.

17. Oktobro 2004, 00:16:01
Purple 
Temo: Re:
You are right Red. It doesn't matter too much. Thanks.

17. Oktobro 2004, 00:09:03
Purple 
Temo: Re:
There isn't much consistancy. Purple World is listed in Fav's and Fellowship columns but Politics R Us only in fellowship column. I never checked or unchecked anything ever.

12. Oktobro 2004, 22:36:06
Purple 
More than just them. Besides they haven't left the site.

12. Oktobro 2004, 19:22:33
Purple 
Temo: Re:
Some are so obvious there are fingerprints all over them. And they are all screened by some lonely people to see if lost love has somehow reappeared. Leads to paranoia and illusions and the best advice is to get other obsessions.

12. Oktobro 2004, 19:09:04
Purple 
Bad guesswork. :)

12. Oktobro 2004, 18:08:15
Purple 
Temo: Re: multiple ID's
Fencer could just delete them and that would also end groundless speculation and false accusations.

12. Oktobro 2004, 14:38:17
Purple 
sadly

11. Oktobro 2004, 16:44:19
Purple 
Temo: Re:
You can make someone go away by using the hide feature and there is no need to call them out unless you get some pleasure by piling on.

6. Oktobro 2004, 02:20:50
Purple 
Temo: Re:
Not stevie!!! LOL

28. Septembro 2004, 22:22:47
Purple 
Temo: Re:
Barnum and Bailey perhaps?

28. Septembro 2004, 03:47:50
Purple 
Temo: Very Widespread
A checker player just complained of the same red X's. Has to be an internal problem.

23. Septembro 2004, 01:02:31
Purple 
The KM did not authorize Glenda's cybering. Strictly a stevie idea. The reason is known to him alone. :)

23. Septembro 2004, 00:55:31
Purple 
Glenda was not a KM operative

23. Septembro 2004, 00:39:28
Purple 
Temo: Re:
We had no one who could beat you Ed

22. Septembro 2004, 21:57:10
Purple 
Temo: Re: Re: BBW
Yes, stevie's memory seems accurate. LOL

22. Septembro 2004, 21:53:38
Purple 
Temo: Re:
Modifita de Purple (22. Septembro 2004, 21:55:25)
Some of our auxilliaries didn't have a KM tag so if you played much checkers there was probably a report on you but it may have been just a one liner..i.e. "likes to chat," "plays single corner" or "weak end game" etc. If you had much of a rating we took a closer look.

22. Septembro 2004, 21:39:50
Purple 
Temo: Re:
Oh my..these were the bad old days of course..Public Relations, Recruiting, Game Analysis, Opposition Research (500 names in the database) Top Guns Task Force, Ratings Monitor Detachment, plus our Pervert Busting Team where someone would disguise as a female and play known cyber guys..then reveal themelves at games end. Some cyber dudes were never heard from again. I can't remember everything. That was a year ago.

22. Septembro 2004, 21:28:30
Purple 
Temo: Ratings Fallacy
Modifita de Purple (22. Septembro 2004, 21:29:32)
Not proud of this but The KM Covert Operations Dept. would occasionally torpedo some arogant hi rated dude by sending in a suicide bomber (often rigged up with a program) who would start a game with say a 2000 rating and..before finishing the game with the target..would tank 7-8 games in a row so the rating would be more like 1400. Then arrogant guy would lose to a 1400 player and take a major ratings hit. This was only done to predatory players but it didn't make it right. It is one example however of how ratings should be taken with a grain of salt.

<< <   1 2 3 4 5   > >>
Dato kaj horindiko
Amikoj salutintaj
Favoritaj forumoj
Kunularoj
ĈĉĜĝĤĥĴĵŜŝŬŭ

Hodiaŭa konsilo
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, ĉiuj rajtoj reservita.
Supren