ughaibu:

Czuch Chuckers: Exactly our point. If this can be included in the user agreement that all using a program MUST admit it, then you can fearlessly brows the profiles for those who haven't admitted anything. It's better than alway shaving this in mind that the user against you is using a program. What do others think?

That kind of thing happens all the time in backgammon. You're using selective memory.
Czuch: why on Earth would anyone take the trouble to hack a site to fix dice in backgammon???!!!!???

reza: Well, like Stevie said, we may as well just trash the whole user agreement, as what kind of site would it be if some of the rules are enforced and others are not? The only people who are likely to play against a cheater are other cheaters. I think it would probably be good in this case to amend the user agreement to allow programs since they are obviously being used anyway, and the only people who are going to be hurt right now are those that admit to it, and it seems like you and others think it is the person who admits it swho should stay anyway!

Fencer & Liquid would know if someone had hacked into the site. Besides, I think everyone gets dice like those described, three double sixes in a row etc..

Czuch Chuckers: perhaps it's not related and off topic, but I too think that dice in backgammon ar enot roled fairly. I mean when my opponent needs only 2,2 he roles that. when the only role that I need to lose is 6.1 I role that. When the only role my opponent needs to have to capture one of my pieces and get ahead for 50 or 60 points is 5.4, he roles that!

how is it possible?

Harley, you also said something the other day about the dice not being rigged at all on this site or possible either. I know on a gambling site for real money hackers had figured out how to see the hands of all the other players. If thety canj do that on a secure site where real money changes hands, then dont know how you can be so posative that nobody could hack this site to rig the dice?

Czuch Chuckers: OK. So it isn't for the benefit of the users but for the benefit of the owner?

In either case, the fact that a player is using a program and IS LETTING others know doesn't hurt either the users or the owner of this site. If players don't want to play him, they don't and if they do, they will play him. so actually Sumerian will not be able to get even a rating if others don't play with him. And in this special case of the tourny, I think he again hasn't done anything wrong. The creator of the tourny has asked him to join knowing the fact that he is using a program and it makes everything clear. The prize giver is free to choose the one he wants to give the prize too. In the tourny no one gets bothered or hurt. They are just games.

harley: I am sure Ed has said he doesnt use programs here because of fear he will not be allowed on this site, as it is against the user agreement to do so. But it seems that the common concesious is that on any turn based site, there are people who are going to use programs and since you never know who is and isnt, it is safer just to use them yourself, and if there are people using programs I am sure that Ed would not have an unblemished record playing against a program without any help himself.

Bank's Ladder for checkers was open for all players but put in the warning: anyone may enter but the competition is is extremely difficult as the programs and their programmers play at a high level. (then you would see the entrants names like Joe Blow..Cake Program etc.) I know of 3 people who play on the internet that cracked the top 20 without a program. A remarkable feat! But of course BK is not Banks Ladder. As a side note they closed down with the note that they had been threatened with a lawsuit by Ed Trice. I don't pretend to know the details but I did get a kick out of it.

ustica: LOl! be sure you'll get your prize if you win the session you're playing in. That's what EdTrice says. If he's a man of his word, then you'll get that $50 if you win the session you're playing in.

reza: It is used to define terms and condition of use for that site. Although a site owner can keep anyone from using their site for any reason or no reason at all, this gives some guidelines to help be consistant in restricting the use to certain users.

reza:so if i win my Section i not get the 50$? dammmmmm i new was a trick.

Czuch Chuckers: That is what a user agreement is. I asked what it is FOR. Why is auser agreement used?

reza: Im not sure if that is a trick question? The user agreement is a contract between the site and the user of the site that the user agrees to certain terms and conditions or forfiets their right to use of that site.

reza: that description doesnt tell the other players that a programme user is playing against them

Please don't accuse Ed of using a programme, he's not here to defend himself. (And I'm sure he's stated before he doesn't)

sLaMdAnCe: we are referring to this tournament:

http://brainking.com/game/Tournaments?tri=25674#5

And it says:


Gothic Chess $500 1st Prize, Free to enter (Gothic Chess - show rules) Creator: EdTrice
As we close the books on another profitable year, we will once again have a free tournament, this time with more prize money. $500 1st prize, $300 2nd prize, and $50 for each "section winner" that is a Knight or Rook before the tournament begins. Players who take 1st or 2nd prize also get the $50 they win in the section. Section prizes will be paid out once the finalists are determined. If any draws are agreed to before 25 moves are played in any game that results in a prize being awarded, the TD reserves the right to award that prize to someone else. I will not be playing in this event.
Back to the list of game types

reza: Whoops! Sorry Ed! Maybe it is worth 500 bucks for him to find out who has the 2nd best cheating machine on this site?

Czuch Chuckers: If you answer this question of mine, I'll answer yours:

what is the user agreement for?

bOtTOm LiNe..
tRiCe WiNz, tHUs No pRiZe.

reza: Why is it okay for anyone to break the user agreement at any time for any reason?

Czuch Chuckers: EdTrice isn't playing in that tourny and we all know EdTrice and Sumerian ar enot the same person. So the worst is that Ed Trice wants to willingly giv ehis money to Sumerian!

Well, I'm sorry I am the cause of all this. I really didn't mean to bring up these things. I still think If EdTrice is giving out the prize, it is his own choice and matter whom to giv eit to. And since he has been aware of the fact that Sumerian is playing with his engine, it is OK if Sumerian wins the tourny. Yes. If I was giving the prize, it would be far too different. Right now, I have no right to complain how others are going to spend their money. My appologies to you Sumerian for all the trouble I have cause you. It's the first time my word brings others problems and I'm really sorry for that.

Czuch Chuckers: dOoMed..

reza: I think Ed Trice only put up that prize because he knows his cheating machine is better than anyone elses. He doesnt plan on paying that prize to anyone but himself. I am glad I dont play chess, and if I did it wouldnt be on a turn based site. My guess is that the majority of the chess players here have cheated at least one move. And it sounds like it is acceptable, so either dont play here or expect to be cheated when you do.

sIg hEIL!

maybe we should trash the rest of the user agreement then??
Cos its ok to use programmes even though it says no you cant. You can say its not to raise bkr..but if you use a programme to win..then your bkr goes up.
Id like to know how many in the mentioned tournament knew a player was in it with programme nomatter how good or humanlike it is, was in it before it started.
Just like the pond game that the players were only told of a "helped" player AFTER the pond started...

WHAT A FARCE

I agree with Chuck. Its not being harsh...its being RULES

Czuch Chuckers: I and it appears Caissus believe it is time to change the wording of the user agreement to reflect the reality of the world as it is and not how some wish it was. Why penalize the honest and reward the cheaters? The one thing good about this is it proves a real drawback to the internet and certain things will always be better.

wE'Re aLL dOoMed..

Czuch Chuckers: LOL! I too think you're being a little bit cruel to him. Pitty Mr. Trice isn't here to tell us why he has agreed to let Sumerian play in the tourny. In fact since he is the one who wants to spend the $500, it's OK if he wants to give it to Sumerian. We really have no right to complain. I complained because I didn't know EdTRice himself invited Sumerian to the tourny. I really think it is O.K to use programs IF AND ONLY IF you let others know and that's something Sumerian has done. So here, I'm quite in favour of him :-)

Czuch Chuckers: There are some other tip offs. For instance a record of 100 wins 0 Losses and 100 draws means a Program has been playing another Program which almost always ends in a draw as well as against regular people who it will beat 100 out of 100 times. LOL

Woah, thats a bit heavy handed, Czuch! You can't end a membership for a man being honest, even if its a bit controversial what he's doing.
Personally, I wouldn't like to play someone who was using a programme, but I'm sure it happens much more than I'm aware of. I think its good that Sumerian tells me beforehand so I have the choice to say I'd rather not play him.
But I do also think that if he's in a tournament then all players should be aware before-hand that someone is using a programme. (Thats the tournament creators responsibility, in my opinion)

OK! Enough already....

Its quite simple. It is against the user agreement here to use a program. But, there is no way to prove the use of such help, so one must assume that others are 'cheating', and the only way to keep up with other cheaters, is to cheat yourself. This all seems quite exceptable, except for Sumarian, who admits to breaking the user agreemant.
The solution is to end Sumarians membership here, and for everyone else to cheat without admitting it, or to lose to cheaters :)

Glad you agree, Stevie

redsales: make a suggestion how to handle that situation in that tournament, so that you would be satisfied, too.

Entering that GC tournament I have not been sure to get that good results in round one. Nevertheless round two will not be that easy to any of the participants. You seem to forget that Smirf still is only a 48K baby of a beta and a victory is not at all realistic.

definately

*sigh* !!!

It's like drag racing.."my machine is better than your machine" LOL

redsales: Do yOu rEaLLy tHiNk tRiCe dOeSNt uSe oNe?

Sumerian: I have nothing against you testing your program here, I admire all acts of creation. I also am aware that Trice invited you to his cash prize tournament. I also know you are the sole programmer and smirf is truly yours. However, using it to compete against humans in a cash tournament definitely is not the same as playing yourself even though you yourself designed it...the simple reason..the program is good enough not to make serious blunders, hang a queen, pawn bishop or whatever other vagaries enter our games when we are tired or drunk or otherwise ill-disposed. It makes no "obviously bad" moves as I know I do on occasion. Having said that, I am sure since it is a cash prize tourney, others will be using programs for an edge. But I just wanted you to know that was one reason I was not interested in entering the tournament, because I did not come here to play machines. Good luck, I will be interested to see if you win.

Pafl: In the German Correspondence Chess Federation (BDF)any helps are official allowed.(They don`t know a better solution of this dilemma)
Even so there are better and bader players.To win against a really strong correspondence chess player you need more...

harley: No worries!

Sorry reza, just a minor disagreement here! Stevie sees that you're discussing chess programmes, where I see it as a general discussion about the use of programmes and cheating. I guess it can be seen either way. But I'm happy for it to continue within reason. If it moves to discussion about specific chess programmes, that would be the time to move it.
Sorry to interrupt the discussion.

harley: Thanks for making your own decisions about this DB. It's worked pretty good up to now. :)

TO SUMERIAN:

That's very nice and generous of you. But I have to refuse since I really am not interested in Gothic chess. If you see I'm taking part in the tournament it is because I just wanted to test my luck and of course abilities and to see how well I can be at something quite unfamiliar.

I am willing, very much willing, to help you bulid a program playing CYLINDER CHESS strongly if you ever decide to do that. But no Gothic or Janus for me. Until when I can manage to have no loss in regular chess, there's no need for me to try those variants. EdTrice is the only man I have seen with NO loss in his profile and smarter than many can even imagine. He has his "iron will" as he once told me and that helps him sit and think for hours and it's something I don't have. I'm just 20 yeras old and am more a kid than a man who is able to sit and just think. I am here mostly to just have fun.

****EDITTED TO CORRECT SOME TYPOES*****

harley: Errr, then I'll repost my message here too.

No, don't worry reza. I think the use of programmes is very much a BrainKing issue, and this isn't a discussion I imagine will carry on for much longer! You all seem to be coming to an agreement. Its good for people to see all sides of this discussion. Fencer seemed interested earlier, thats good enough for me.

Caissus: Caissus, I reacted to your post before because it seemed to me that it says (in other words) "the best way to deal with the fact that many people are using programs is to use a program yourself so that the chances are even". For my part, I have to say that it is much better for me if there are cheaters on the site (people using SW and not admitting it) than if let's say, 60% of chess players would be using SW, admitting it openly and thus forcing the others into using SW as well. This is the way I saw your proposal and it frightened me.
After all, I do not see the point of the programs at all - using a program turns an exciting game into administrative work and as for rating, how can one be happy about his/her rating, knowing that it is not his/her own achievement ?