Uzanta Nomo: Pasvorto:
Nova Uzanta Registrado
Moderatoro: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Mesaĝoj en paĝo:
Listo de diskutaj forumoj
Vi ne rajtas afiŝi mesaĝojn en ĉi tiu forumo. La minimuma necesa nivelo de la membreco por afiŝi mesaĝojn en ĉi tiu forumo estas Brain-Kavaliro.
Moduso: Ĉiu rajtas sendi
Serĉi en mesaĝoj:  

<< <   594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603   > >>
7. Aprilo 2004, 10:26:29
Jason 
Temo: Re: Hope people don't mind
mrloupcity , play at your own speed ,fast or slow there is no need to race to get a game finished ..they finish when they finish , if people complain about you moving slow it is THEM that is in the wrong tournaments not you

i have some games that have been running almost 14 months now and could take at least another 6 months lol ...... im a speed player when i get my finger out but there are days when i dont feel like it .
you cant make everyone happy lol

7. Aprilo 2004, 10:08:18
cariad 
Temo: Re: Hope people don't mind
mrloupcity, don't you dare let people bully you into not playing in tournaments! If you want to play slow, that's up to you not other people.
I've played you a few times and it's always been a pleasure and you've never played slowly.

5. Aprilo 2004, 17:15:55
harley 
Could you move this to the tablut discussion board please?

5. Aprilo 2004, 16:02:13
WhisperzQ 
I think the draw is a valid result. In chess, for instance, there are the three conditions for a draw ... stalemate, thrice-repeated board postions and 50 moves (plus an agreed draw). All are situations where the player who might win should be able to control the play to ensure that the draw does not occur; if they do not, then they do not deserve to win. And so, I think, it should be here. This also ties in with an earlier discussion on the advantage white appears to have in this game and one proposal was touted whereby white could not repeat a move (maybe should be board position?) to generate "perpetual check". Again, I have not found this rule on any other sites, did Linnaeus included something on this?

I think the play by white in this game was quite clever to get to the end position once it was obvious they could not escape (or maybe they were just lucky?!). The more important issue is the game was played under one set of rules and decided by another. This is not the first time rules on this site have been changed mid(post)-game. While you say the King was clearly captured, in terms of the capture rule this is not so and moving into a beavy of defenders is part of the tactics of the game, so why should it change just at the end?

5. Aprilo 2004, 05:56:04
ughaibu 
Temo: Whisperz
I think they're in Murray's History of Board Games other than Chess. Why do you think a game like Lythande's should be drawn? The king has clearly been captured.

5. Aprilo 2004, 05:11:44
Czuch 
Temo: Re:
yeah, im having more problems again too...

5. Aprilo 2004, 05:09:33
coan.net 
It's been a little slow at times for me also.

5. Aprilo 2004, 04:36:02
Czuch 
Temo: Re:
Yeah, I powered off and reset my system, Im better now :)

5. Aprilo 2004, 04:06:02
TexasToest 
Mine has been fine, King. I'm on cable.

5. Aprilo 2004, 03:22:14
Czuch 
Just me? Or is this site running on slow motion tonight?

4. Aprilo 2004, 23:58:26
WhisperzQ 
Ughaibu: Where do you find these rules by Linnaeus?

4. Aprilo 2004, 21:10:22
ughaibu 
Temo: Whisperz
Linnaeus himself in his original record of the rules says a win if the king cant move. I agree that the king could move into that position as long as it had the possibility of leaving.

4. Aprilo 2004, 19:34:20
Czuch 
Temo: Re: Re tablut game 178202
I agree with Whisperz....

4. Aprilo 2004, 19:28:57
Fencer 
The rules were not changed, only completed.

4. Aprilo 2004, 18:53:33
WhisperzQ 
Temo: Re tablut game 178202
I believe that the game should (have been) be a draw, not a win for black. One task that black must take on in this situation, where they are in such control, is to manage the situation so that they do win. If they cannot do this they do not deserve to win and playing for the draw (successfully so in this situation) should be an option for white. The rules should definitely NOT be changed mid (or post) game.

I have just checked the rules and see that there is now a 3rd win condition that I do not remember before which references the "no valid move" situation. I expect this has just been added. This scenario was previuosly discussed in the Tablut DB without any change being considered appropriate then so I don't see why one is pertinent now. I do not agree with the rule change and believe that the game (would be) is devalued with this change ... just my opinion though.

*Edit* I have just done a search of other internet sites with Tablut and other similar variants. While some rules are slightly different (number of pieces, size of board, need for King to reach the corner, capturing against the King as well as pawns) none mention a rule whereby a win is awarded against a player not able to make a valid move ... I STRONGLY believe the rule change must go.

4. Aprilo 2004, 10:39:03
harley 
rod, put him on your enemies list, then he can't send you any messages :o)

4. Aprilo 2004, 08:28:26
rod03801 
in backgammon too, Fencer?

now I'll wait for Dano's alter ego to invade my message box with rude remarks.. He always does when this subject comes up

lol.. solve THAT in bk 2.0!!!

:-D

4. Aprilo 2004, 08:25:02
Kevin 
rofl Fencer... i'll have to stop making those illegal moves now! ;-)

4. Aprilo 2004, 08:17:19
Lythande 
Thank you. :)

4. Aprilo 2004, 08:04:10
ughaibu 
Thanks.

4. Aprilo 2004, 08:00:31
Fencer 
It was a joke. Illegal moves should not be possible to do [except some special cases, fixed in BK 2.0].

4. Aprilo 2004, 07:56:40
ughaibu 
Temo: Fencer
Could you explain your reply to Backoff please.

4. Aprilo 2004, 07:53:58
Fencer 
Lythande: Done.
Backoff: Who makes an illegal move, loses the game and also one or two othes ones, randomly picked :-D

4. Aprilo 2004, 07:47:39
Backoff 
how about an illegal move??? :)

4. Aprilo 2004, 07:42:17
Lythande 
Thanks, Fencer. :)

..erm.. but can you fix the game in question, or does she need to resign?

4. Aprilo 2004, 07:40:10
Fencer 
Okay, let's add a rule of player losing a game when he cannot make a legal move. Black wins in this case.

4. Aprilo 2004, 06:37:49
ughaibu 
White needs to resign.

4. Aprilo 2004, 04:48:48
Backoff 
sorry, fixed

I've been searching all over the place and no1 seems to agree on the rules. So I would say that they need to be set in stone for this site. just my $.02

4. Aprilo 2004, 04:42:23
coan.net 
bumble's link does not include the www in the front of Brainking, so your cookies don't sign you on to the correct page, taking you to the log-in page.

< A HREF="/game/ShowGame?g=178202&i=13" > - best way to write it so it works for everyone (LINK)

4. Aprilo 2004, 04:39:39
Lythande 
Oh.. and Bumble? That link takes me to the login page for some odd reason... And as to 'where has Lythande gotten off to' .. I'm off reading/playing/etc in this and other tabs. ;)

4. Aprilo 2004, 04:37:06
Lythande 
Ah.. So perhaps it should be a stalemate?

4. Aprilo 2004, 04:35:13
Backoff 
just pointing out that the full rules need to be written lol. Ok in the current position, the king can't move, should this be a black win? Hummm, where's the rules when you need them lol
BTW white missed an easy win on 10 lol.

4. Aprilo 2004, 04:34:25
coan.net 
Talbut Board - Good place to read and talk more about the rules of the game.

Fencer's post on April 14, 2003 - about a similar situation as mentioned below - "Should be considered as a draw but this site does not support a perpetual check detection yet."

4. Aprilo 2004, 04:31:10
coan.net 
But the Mercenaries did not surround the king - the king "jumped" into the middle of their group.

Just like a pawn can jump in between 2 other color pawns and not be removed. (Yes, many of the rules on this site does not explain all the details - I'm sure Fencer will take help with any additional rule writing for any games) (speaking of that, Battleboats does not even have rules yet.) :-)

4. Aprilo 2004, 04:28:21
Backoff 
From the rules page:
Mercenaries surround the king from all four sides and capture him. The second possibility is that mercenaries surround the king from three sides and the throne stands on the fourth side (since nobody, including the king, cannot move to the throne). The black player wins the game.

If the king moving into that dosn't mean a black win, then the rules need to reflect that because as the rules are written now, black should have won.

4. Aprilo 2004, 04:25:52
coan.net 
Ok - Figured out the problem (After reading the Talbut message board)

Black did not surrond the white king - The white king MOVED INTO the space surroned by white pawns - which is not a lose.

Now where Lythande's game is now, White can not move at all - so I would guess what needs to happen in those cases is that it is a lose for White - maybe something Fencer will have to program sometime.

4. Aprilo 2004, 04:19:31
Backoff 
that's move 7 for white.

4. Aprilo 2004, 04:19:05
Backoff 
this should have been game.

4. Aprilo 2004, 04:17:48
Lythande 
"two moves ago" ..erm.. I meant the move before last. According to the rules, black only has to surround the white king on three sides, if the throne is on the fourth. This was done -before- I captured her last pawn, moving my soldier onto the fourth side with the throne between.

4. Aprilo 2004, 04:15:18
coan.net 
I'm no Talbut expert, but "2 moves ago" was not a win before the king was not surronded by black completly.

And like bumble said, it looks like it should be a win now - Fencer should be able to fix it once he come on-line.

UPDATED POST: Would move 7 be a win for black? The kind is surroned by 3 spots - the forth (Other side of start) is it's own white pawn, so I would not think that would count..... But again, I don't play talbut very much

4. Aprilo 2004, 04:13:58
Backoff 
Move 7 should have been game over, black wins.

4. Aprilo 2004, 04:05:02
bumble 
Yeah, I've just looked. Black definitely wins.

4. Aprilo 2004, 04:03:14
bumble 
No you're not missing anything, Lythande. It's happened to me before now. It's a bug and would probably be best if white resigned.

4. Aprilo 2004, 03:56:00
Lythande 
<Since Fencer isn't currently on (I've already sent him a personal message), could one of you Talbut experts please check Game ID: 178202 for me? I think it should have been a win two moves ago. Now white's king is surrounded, but the game is threatening to time out. My opponent offered a draw, but only because it was the only link she could find. ;>

Tell me if I'm missing something.

3. Aprilo 2004, 18:07:13
Kevin 
Thanks everyone... :-)

3. Aprilo 2004, 11:09:24
harley 
And don't forget to send me questions for Kevins interview!!

3. Aprilo 2004, 07:57:02
Artful Dodger 
Temo: Great Job Kevin
well done

3. Aprilo 2004, 07:48:24
Backoff 
Kevin I think that's great what your doing!!! Keep up the good work.

3. Aprilo 2004, 07:47:39
Linda J 
Temo: Re: Membership Competition
WOW!!! Good job Kevin

3. Aprilo 2004, 07:38:30
TexasToest 
SOD, the hyperlinks turn a different color to indicate that you've been there done that. When the target changes in any way, it turns back to the color of an unseen page.

<< <   594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603   > >>
Dato kaj horindiko
Amikoj salutintaj
Favoritaj forumoj
Kunularoj
ĈĉĜĝĤĥĴĵŜŝŬŭ

Hodiaŭa konsilo
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, ĉiuj rajtoj reservita.
Supren