Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.
If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).
Listo de diskutaj forumoj
Vi ne rajtas afiŝi mesaĝojn en ĉi tiu forumo. La minimuma necesa nivelo de la membreco por afiŝi mesaĝojn en ĉi tiu forumo estas Brain-Kavaliro.
Energizer: I love progressive, and play a strong game. Would recommend adding a Fischer Random option for it, as (IMO) the standard variant's openings are deeply analyzed, and don't offer much opportunity for original analysis.
ketchuplover:That might be what's needed for backgammon tournies here. Some of us already use memorized Match Equity Tables. We may need to combine them with actuarial tables, to account for the differential likelihood of the players passing away during the events.
alilsassy: Sometimes I saw a blank page; sometimes not. But even when it was blank, I was able to right-click and "view source" of that page. Sorry I didn't spend more time looking at that (nor did I save it).
Bwild wrote "I agree, and feel sorry for those who have purchased lifetime memberships. it has to be discouraging,to say the least, to find out the sites owner could care less if cheating goes on,or if long time members leave because of the lack of interest provided by the owner. "
Thanks. But mostly I have myself to blame. My love of variants got the better of my judgment. Live and learn: in the future, support responsive individuals and organizations.
SL-Mark: "Being beaten in a dice game, well it was simply that the die favoured the other player! i.e. luck." "Beaten in a game of skill, however, then the loser can only critique themselves."
Those observations are a good start.
Being beaten in a dice game, one can all too easily conclude that the loss was purely a matter of bad luck, and that there was nothing in one's own play that deserved criticism. Not all dice games are created equal. Have you ever noticed that the frequency of claims of "unfair dice" tends to be inversely proportional to players' strength?
"Dice games require less thinking?" Who would say such a thing? On the contrary (at least in some dice games), in addition to strategic considerations, one must also calculate various probabilities.
Tuesday: Perhaps it's time I posed this question to my sports psychologist: why are my 2 favorite sports/games (curling and chess) ones in which resignation in the face of virtually certain defeat is appropriate and expected (as opposed to the majority of contests--which are played until time expires, specific goals are reached, or a certain number of points are scored, etc.)?
I'm not sure it's merely a coincidence; this may be more a matter of temperament.
Fencer: I seem to recall playing in some tournaments (not here at BK) where that approach was used, and it was a great option. It works exceptionally well with variants like fischerrandom progressive chess--where you can avoid having an over-analyzed starting position, but at the same time you don't want to give some players far more favorable/inferior positions than other players.
rabbitoid: If they're identical, I might feel less hesitant to claim occasional dice rolling weirdness here, too. But I really hate to move toward that conclusion, as I feel sure that the vast majority of "dice cheating" claims that are made against backgammon sites and (especially) backgammon software are completely groundless. I do not wish to join the lunatic fringe.
rabbitoid: Leave that 21-point cloning backgammon match to me in your will! I'll carry on. My longest cloning game so far is a 228-mover. Is your match using a doubling cube, at least?
Artful Dodger: That message reminds me of some code I wrote years ago for text processing . When some particularly lengthy files are being handled, some of the following messages can appear on screen:
This will take a while. Coffee drinkers...now's your chance!
Will you be needing the output TODAY?
Admit it: no one will ever need to look at this output file.
ScarletRose: Substantially quicker here, too, in the US Midwest, since about 3-4 days ago. Like many of you, I hesitated to speak up, fearing that it might just be some temporary phenomenon.
Of those of you who have had problems: did any of you make a note of the approximate date when our troubles began? So many of the analyses and helpful suggestions only spoke of computer upgrades, ISPs, geographic locales, browser types...but lost in all of that was the starting date of our problems. I'd have liked to look for a critical clue there...
Temo: Re: but it is not worth a tenfold of the current monthly fee I am already paying. Expenses must be reasonable too.
Ewe: Ewe: I can't speak for Andersp, but when I took the life membership plunge, response times seemed relatively quick. I think I even managed to make >500 moves in a day--but now that's just inconceivable.
I'll try to be constructive--or at least informative--by saying that it's only recently (say, 2-3 weeks or so?) that I've had to wait a much longer time for a response, with the browser displaying this status: "Waiting for http://www.brainking.com/...etc..."
This is true whether I'm connected at home via DSL, or at work (on a much speedier system) via T1.
I don't think I can blame my individual PC's, nor ISP's. But maybe I should "Czech" out some other .cz sites to see how connectivity seems from here in the USA Midwest.
Bernice: I had fun with that last week playing Backgammon--it was like a new BrainKing puzzle! Figuring out where in the HTML code would one find the names of the image files that would dictate which die faces would be displayed...in the hope that those filenames would provide a clue. (And they do.)
Did anyone else encounter a temporary problem with incoming messages this morning?
I've got 2 in my Inbox that are undisplayable--no error messages...just blank screens. They arrived about 20 minutes apart. Messages since then have been fine.
Tigger: As you might know, there are some sites that allow you to review dice rolls after a game or series of games, showing what the actual distributions were--compared to the theoretical average values. Neat stuff! Sometimes I'll see that an opponent got more nice rolls than expected, but not so many that would clearly demonstrate some kind of cheating. But those rolls and situations are painful...and they stand out in memory!
I think that in games involving dice (or in other games of imperfect information), very good players will combine a solid grasp of probabilities with an understanding of how those probabilities might unfold in play. They'll do a better job of anticipating possibilities, and will tend to distribute their pieces in play so as to maximize positive outcomes and minimize bad outcomes. I think that at times it can present the illusion that they're influencing rolls or getting access to hidden knowledge...
Pbarb2: You can also forward that kind of email to spoof@paypal.com, but do so without removing any of the message header or clicking on any links contained in the message you received.
Other financial organizations typically have a similar email box (spoof@ebay, abuse@bankofthewest.com, are some examples), where such spoofing attempts can be directed for quick investigation and disabling of the spoofing site(s).
I generally will forward such messages, even if I have no dealings whatsoever with the financial organization that the message "seems" to come from. (I figure I'm doing a good deed that way.) Remember that spoofers are usually just guessing which organizations people might have accounts with, so they'll tend to pick larger ones ( = better chances of their reaching actual customers, and perhaps getting somebody to respond and divulge personal information).
alanback: A little while ago on the Computers board, I mentioned a useful online utility for icon and image resizing. (It will let you preview an icon or image, so you can decide whether the result is worth saving/uploading, or needs additional work.)
Feel free to move this question to another area, if there's a more appropriate place. Does a double check count as one check or two, according to the BrainKing software? My guess (and preference) is "one", but I need to know in order to choose the proper continuation in a current game. Thanks in advance!
(kaŝi) Se vi restigas la musmontrilon sur la piktogramo pri lia membreco, aperos ŝpruchelpilo kun liaj ĉefaj detaloj. (pauloaguia) (Montri ĉiujn konsilojn)