Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
Listo de diskutaj forumoj
Vi ne rajtas afiŝi mesaĝojn en ĉi tiu forumo. La minimuma necesa nivelo de la membreco por afiŝi mesaĝojn en ĉi tiu forumo estas Brain-Peono.
(V): being the google king..I would have thought you'd have cyphered this out. Rod asked"Is it "anti Christian" to believe there may be life else where in the universe?" I stated" Ezechiel saw the wheel" the book of Ezechiel describes what I believe to be,an ALIEN encounter.
now as far as "shrooms" go......lol heres a guy that was picking the wrong kind.
but...as I was feebly trying to add input.. I was at least staying with the conversation at hand.
Bwild: That one I never could figure out. I assumed the parts of that vision represented something rather than being something. Or maybe he was seeing something in the future that wouldn't make sense to someone living then. I don't know. I've heard different explanations, but I still don't get it. This is what happens when I don't read things all the way through.
Some people read the health bill all the way through... I wasn't even going to try slogging my way through that one.
mckinley: "I heard that last night and am very disappointed."
I haven't read the entire Bible, but I'll bet you won't find anything in there that says just because you voted for a stinker the first time around, you have to vote for him again. I'm not saying you did, I'm just saying you always have a choice.
In the Garden of Eden man voted for a stinker and ever since then God has been trying to win us back. If you listen closely you might even hear Him saying "Miss me yet?" or "Had enough?" We always have a choice.
If nothing else, then getting Obama out of there would mean not having to listen to him anymore. If you're not enchanted by the sound of his voice, then what else is there?
Bwild: The wheel is also a common symbol when it comes to the Gods. A variation on the crucifix and other ancient symbols. The moving God I think it represents.
N' no.. that was from a library book on spiritualism and mysticism. Some old prof explaining it, not google.
I also said "....or just the strange world of unconscious conscious dreams?"
I guess you've never had one of them.
In the end.. Christianity and Aliens.. The book was never about science. Just the church made it that way. Just the way in the UK we are taught about Christianity or was by the teachers at the Catholic school I went to.
The mother of Irish rock legend Phil Lynott has objected to the Mitt Romney campaign using Thin Lizzy's music at last week's Republican National Convention.
Philomena Lynott said her son would not have approved of the US Republicans playing the Thin Lizzy anthem "The Boys Are Back In Town" at Romney's nomination as presidential candidate.
She said that the late Thin Lizzy front man would have rejected any association with the Republicans particularly the Christian right wing of the party.
The Dublin woman told the Irish music magazine "Hot Press" that she was upset that one of her son's most famous rock songs was used by the Republicans to endorse Romney and his running mate Paul Ryan.
The Thin Lizzy singer would have opposed the Republican anti-gay and pro-rich policies, she said. Instead she believed her son would have backed Barack Obama.
She told the magazine: "As far as I am concerned, Mitt Romney's opposition to gay marriage and to civil unions for gays makes him anti-gay – which is not something that Philip would have supported. He had some wonderful gay friends, as indeed I do, and they deserve equal treatment in every respect, whether in Ireland or the United States.
"Neither would Philip have supported his policy of taxing the poor and offering tax cuts to the rich, which Paul Ryan is advocating. There is certainly no way that I would want the Lynott name to be associated with any of those ideas.
"There is nothing I can do about it except express my views," Philomena Lynott added, "but I do want to be clear that I would not want Philip's music to be used in any way that could hurt a single person, and this is the effect of what happened with Paul Ryan using and abusing my son's music in that way. A lot of fans and musicians are very angry about it and I can fully understand why.
"There is a black president of America, which to me – as it would have been to Philip, as a proud, black Irishman – is wonderfully symbolic.
I have a lot of time for Barack Obama, so to hear 'The Boys Are Back in Town' being appropriated by Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan in their campaign against him is deeply upsetting."
The now 81-year-old Philomena Lynott wrote a best-selling autobiography My Boy about the extraordinarily difficult times she and Philip endured in the UK and Ireland at the beginning of the '50s, following Philip's birth in 1949.
... Country music is lacking in some areas of .. .. power.
Speaking of which.. It looks like the common electron is not a fundamental particle, as in it is made up of smaller particles. But (adopting best Scotty accent) ... we need morrre powerr to prrrobe captain!!
Bwild: it is hard to inject oneself into a conversation on here isn't it? Ive tried, but keep getting ignored, so I just read the crap others have written.
MissDelish: We're not alone!! personally I feel politics are no more than diversions developed by the big business' that run the countries and their puppet politicians.
Bwild: "the book of Ezechiel describes what I believe to be,an ALIEN encounter."
Depends on what you mean by "ALIEN". If it was a strictly physical phenomenon then the people he was with would have seen it too. But the passage doesn't mention anything about the other people witnessing the event.
"Now it came to pass in the thirtieth year, in the fourth month, on the fifth day of the month, as I was among the captives by the River Chebar, that the heavens were opened and I saw visions of God . . .
Since only Ezekial is refered to as witnessing the event, it really doesn't fall under the catagory of an alien encounter (physical creatures from another planet). Also, it was not a subtle event... if it was any kind of natural phenomenon (including alien encounters) everyone there would have seen it as well.
"Then I looked, and behold, a whirlwind was coming out of the north, a great cloud with raging fire engulfing itself; and brightness was all around it and radiating out of its midst like the color of amber, out of the midst of the fire.
Not the sort of thing only one person would have noticed. But then the vision refers to a man in linen told to gather coals and scatter them over a city, harldly a message you would expect to hear in an alien encounter.
"Then He spoke to the man clothed with linen, and said, 'Go in among the wheels, under the cherub, fill your hands with coals of fire from among the cherubim, and scatter them over the city.' And he went in as I watched."
"Then it happened, when He commanded the man clothed in linen, saying, 'Take fire from among the wheels, from among the cherubim,' that he went in and stood beside the wheels"
Parts of Ezekials vision sound a little bit like an alein encounter, but it better fits the picture of a vision apparently given specifically to Ezekial. Anytime the Bible talks about an event visible to everyone present, then it's always mentioned that everyone witnessed it.
Iamon lyme: imagine seeing such a site,in those days. if he would have told everyone.."hey! I just saw an ALIEN!" he'd have been stoned(maybe he was) or in the least,deemed a heretic. preachers have a way with bending terms and words. I think all deities are the result of encounters.
Bwild: I have enough trouble with science without trying to figure out how or why visions are parcelled out. For instance, if light takes about 8 minutes to get here from the sun, how long would it take to get here if you could get light to travel twice as fast? You would think the answer is 4 minutes, but it's not. Anything traveling towards us faster than light speed would get here before it left... I still have trouble wrapping my head around things like that.
Bwild: Actually, I can believe that some people are literally able to see things that others don't. Magic Eyes pictures are a good example. The "hidden" patterns are there, but not everyone can see them. The trick to seeing the images is letting your eyes relax and let your brain "see" them... your eyes can't see it, but your brain can.
This fascinates me, because it suggests reality may be full of things we don't perceive simply because we've been trained to only see what is in front of us... but not the patterns those things may collectively form.
Artful Dodger: See? I told ya. They know the magic words. All they need to do is to say "birther" or "conspiracy" and then poof, the problem goes away. It's magic. And yes, I know, the magic doesn't work on everyone. But I don't need to tell you that.
If Nixon could see us now I think he would feel a little better about his own downfall. Carter is already feeling better, or should be... it's hard to tell with some politicians. I have no idea how honest or not some of these guys are able to be with just themselves.
Artful Dodger: A little over year ago I first heard someone predict just how nasty this election cycle would be, and he was right. Up until today I haven't heard the magic word "Nazi" used, but I learned this morning the word has already been used or alluded to (twice) when refering to Republicans. One Democrat said something to the effect that some lies can only work if it's a big enough lie. No kidding?!!
Who would have believed that someone could go an entire four years as president with the question of his birthplace hanging over his head, and with virtually no consequences? It's like letting a minor into a bar and not questioning his age until after he becomes rip roaring drunk... and then hope he leaves on his own before someone questions the management's judgement and possible liability.
Iamon lyme: “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
Joseph Goebbels
“The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly - it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over”
Übergeek 바둑이: Nah, that horse never even stood up. Thanks to a complacent media. But it is curious how that little brochure stated Kenya for all those years and no one noticed. Now as for his faked birth certificate.......
Iamon lyme: Yeah well Obama has plenty of skeletons in his double sealed - triple locked closet but Romney did a prank on a kid when he was in high school.
Temo: Re:using nazi propoganda techniques are not not the same as branding someone a "nazi"
The Col: The Col: [using nazi propoganda techniques are not not the same as branding someone a "nazi"]
No, but claiming someone is using nazi propaganda techniques is the same as equating them with the nazi's. A Democrat quoted Goebbels, claiming the Republicans were following his advice. Goebbels was a high ranking nazi, and what I said was "...the word has already been used or alluded to..."
allude: to refer indirectly, briefly, or implicitly
The Democratic leadership has more to worry about than simply trying to get their guy re-elected. I think many of them are "showing" their support but secretly hoping he will lose.
But win or lose, the overarching hope will be that the controversy surrounding Obama's presidency will eventually fade away... because this time it's not just about an election. It's also about the credibility of the Democratic party, and whether they can ever be trusted to run a legitimate and clean election. I believe the fate of the party itself may be on the line... but there are ways to fix it, like renaming the party. Wouldn't really change anything except in the mind of some voters, but let's face it, it's the voters they are the most concerned about. It's all about keeping as many of the voters as they can on their side.
Iamon lyme: [...ever be trusted to run a legitimate and clean election.]
I meant to say legitimate and clean campaign.
But it's not just the campaigning. They've been ignoring the consitution for longer than some of you have been alive, appointed people to offices with little or no representation or oversight (or accountability) and on local levels work to overturn measures voted on... and then putting other measures to be voted on several times until they get the vote they want, and then often times simply go to judges to over rule the will of the people.
The idea behind "We The People" is being ignored to the point where it could soon become meaningless.
Other word in popular use is 'socialist', 'liberal', 'constitution', 'American'.
If the right here prefers it, the use of the terminology from "1984" and/or "Animal Farm" are to those who've read such classics could be employed if they feel a bit 'sensitive'.
Iamon lyme: Did you watch the Dems convention where they were voting on putting the name "God" back into their platform? Half the crowd booed and voted no. They voted three times and then the moderator said he had a 2/3's majority. What a crock. Debbie Wasselman Schultz even denied there was dissension at the convention over the issue. CNN said she had to be living in a different reality to miss the obvious tension. Then Debbie cancelled all her other TV appointments. What a laugh.
Temo: Re:What does God have to do with politics? All I have ever read about it is Jesus said follow the laws of your land.
mckinley: I thought God was supposed to be left out of politics. A separation between God and the State.
... Lest we forget the past and what has happened when in 'Christian' countries the church was the state. St Thomas More had people burned at the stake for reading the Bible in English!!
...... King James launched a mass hysteria on Witches... even more strange since the most famous verse used in to vindicate this action was to do with ... getting a woman pregnant out of wedlock.
mckinley: Nobody can touch his oratory skills.He surgically took apart the Republicans with the touch of a master surgeon.69% of the nation give him a favorable rating, so many Republicans also clearly like him.Can you imagine him debating Romney? it would be child's play what he would do to him.
Artful Dodger: I haven't been watching the convention. I didn't watch the Republican convention either. But I did happen to see Clint Eastwood begin to talk when channel surfing, so I watched that.
Last night I was channel surfing again and thought I saw Benny Hill in drag, but then realised it was someone speaking at the Democrat convention. From what I hear it was a genuine love fest last night... thrills running up both legs for some of the folks there. Any time I think I feel a thrill running up my leg it's usually a bug... and a thrill running down my leg is usually bad news.
Iamon lyme: I can't remember if I saw the Benny Hill look alike last night or the night before. I think that may have been the night before. I'm not kidding, I thought I had tuned into the Benny Hill Show... that's right, now I remember, the real Benny Hill didn't show up until last night. LOL
mckinley: Well ask the Dems. God was IN their platform and then they removed God and then last night they "voted" Him back in (in an obvious fraudulent vote). At least 1/2 of the liberal delegates BOOED the vote that allowed God back into the Democratic Platform (along with the acknowledgment that Jerusalem is the Capitol of Israel) (even though the Obama administration really doesn't accept Jerusalem as the Nation's Capital!!!
Temo: Re:What does God have to do with politics? All I have ever read about it is Jesus said follow the laws of your land.
(V): [... Lest we forget the past and what has happened when in 'Christian' countries the church was the state.]
It wasn't forgotten here when we declared the state had to keep it's hands off the church. This was to insure there would be no state controlled religion as existed at that time in England. I don't know what your own country's documents say about that, but you are repeating a myth about a "separation" that doesn't exist in the consitution. In our document it was intended to keep the state from taking over religion and telling people how they must worship, not to keep religious people from participating in government. Do you really not see the difference?
Artful Dodger: [Did you watch the Dems convention where they were voting on putting the name "God" back into their platform?]
I misunderstood what I heard on the radio this morning. I thought the Dems were "voting" (if you can call it that) to leave out recognition of God and Jerusalem as the Capitol of Israel, so I was surprised to hear about the booing. Now it makes sense. I believe it was part of their platform 4 years ago, so I wonder what has changed between then and now? hmmmmm, I wonder....
Oh wait, I get it now. It changed!! You know, hope and change? They wanted to make some big changes, and hoped no one would catch on before the next election.
Iamon lyme: Well in their defense, they were for God and Jerusalem before they were against it before they were for it again (well sort of for it....they actually voted against the measure but the Chairman declared a 2/3's majority anyway (they even lie to their own party members).
And remember, Obama is for partial birth abortion which is nothing less than infanticide. The baby is partially delivered then killed (brains sucked out after making a slit into the base of the baby's skull). Obama also voted against protecting new born babies that survived abortions. So in other words, Obama favors the deliberate killing of new born infants! When an abortion fails and the baby is born alive, the woman is NO LONGER PREGNANT! So her body is no longer affected by a pregnancy. The baby is fully separated from the "mother" and any decent person can see that. But Obama is just fine will killing innocent new born babies.
Temo: Re: I'll never understand some Republicans......
The Col: The draft ended in 1973, and if anyone has been sending teenagers off to war over the past 4 years it has been the Democrats. As for the sanctity of life, Democrats have shown extraordinary compassion for every known form of life other than their own. So it's entirely understandable that you would have trouble understanding some Republicans.
(kaŝi) Ludu ludon realtempe kontraŭ enlinia kontraŭulo! Por ebligi tion, vi ambaŭ elektu la agon "Movi kaj resti ĉi tie" kiel preferita kaj reŝutu la paĝon per la klavo F5! (TeamBundy) (Montri ĉiujn konsilojn)