Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
Listo de diskutaj forumoj
Vi ne rajtas afiŝi mesaĝojn en ĉi tiu forumo. La minimuma necesa nivelo de la membreco por afiŝi mesaĝojn en ĉi tiu forumo estas Brain-Peono.
1. FIRST, We have granted to God, and by this our present Charter have confirmed, for Us and our Heirs for ever, that the Church of England shall be free, and shall have all her whole Rights and Liberties inviolable. We have granted also, and given to all the Freemen of our Realm, for Us and our Heirs for ever, these Liberties under-written, to have and to hold to them and their Heirs, of Us and our Heirs for ever.
9. THE City of London shall have all the old Liberties and Customs which it hath been used to have. Moreover We will and grant, that all other Cities, Boroughs, Towns, and the Barons of the Five Ports, as with all other Ports, shall have all their Liberties and free Customs.
29. NO Freeman shall be taken or imprisoned, or be disseised of his Freehold, or Liberties, or free Customs, or be outlawed, or exiled, or any other wise destroyed; nor will We not pass upon him, nor condemn him, but by lawful judgment of his Peers, or by the Law of the land. We will sell to no man, we will not deny or defer to any man either Justice or Right.[43]
The Col: It wouldn't matter if it wasn't for them wanting to turn scripture into law... If the talk was less extreme and more moderate they'd get more voters and be a people party rather than an 'us and them' party.
If a UK rbased extreme right wing party got a MP and suggested banning abortion ... hang on.. never happen. It cost too much in laundry bills through the other MP's wetting themselves in laughter.
"""Texas Democrats are calling for the resignation of a Republican elected county judge who warned this week that the nation could descend into civil war if President Barack Obama is re-elected.
"It's really up to Judge (Tom) Head to do the right thing and resign and stop embarrassing Lubbock County," said Kenny Ketner, who became the county Democratic Party's chief Monday.""""
Wow... we had a crazy judge like that... or two or three, they are gone now thank God!!
Wow! Did I call this one, or what? The republicans are calling for Akins to step down, and the Democrats want him to stay in the race. He's been defunded by the RNC, he gets no more money from them, so maybe the Dems could keep Akins campaign going if they throw some of their money to him. lol
What is left to milk out of this story? How long will it take Dems to get off the teat and find something else to cry about?
Temo: Re: They figure Romney will forward their agenda when he gets elected anyway.
Artful Dodger: Do you agree a woman should be forced to carry to term a child from rape or incest? I also agree in ending the pregnancy if the life of the mother is in danger
Temo: Re: They figure Romney will forward their agenda when he gets elected anyway.
The Col: You're not ending a pregnancy. You are taking the life of a baby in the womb. So just to be clear, you agree that killing a baby in the womb is justified if the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest?
What other situation do you agree where killing the unborn baby in the womb is acceptable?
Temo: Re: Re Can't waste semen, as it is all that is needed to create life
(V): In a perfect world Republicans would like to outlaw birth control, or at least their "crazy uncle" extreme right would. That's basically how I look at the present two parties.Both have "crazy uncle" factions, the extremists of their respective parties out of the mainstream.In the current situation the right's "crazy uncle" has taken control of the Republican agenda
lol ... so say the resident pundits, with little historical perspective and eyes wide shut. Hey, you want a hear a broad but brief overview of the Bible? I didn't think so, but I'll tell you anyway.
Okay then... the history of mankind is one example after another of people behaving like masochists, hurting themselves and each other, and then blaming someone else... including a God they claim doesn't exist.
Sounds kind of grim, doesn't it. Not like the atheists, who paint themselves as mankinds true saviors, and who glorify themselves as being... being what? The universes greatest creation? All you have to do is tune in to almost any science program, and listen to the opposite of self loathing... it's enough to make a normal person want to puke.
Btw.. isn't it true that if the Mitt wins and tries to get through legislation on banning abortion.. The line between state and church separation is crossed.
As, the Bible is being used to decide on government policy.
Temo: Re: Abortion will be outlawed even in instances of rape or incest, it is in the Republican platform
The Col: I know.... but getting it through!!
I hope they are willing to cover the extra cost that the ER, doctors and hospitals will find themselves spending to help the sick women that result from driving abortions underground.
... But it just about the perceived Bible interpretation being right!! Can't waste semen, as it is all that is needed to create life.
Temo: Re: They figure Romney will forward their agenda when he gets elected anyway.
The Col: Really... how? And isn't that a bit hypocritical... small government, yet you are now wanting to use government to ban abortions!! Even at a state level that's hypocritical.
"McCain had a backbone and wouldn't be as likely to cave to their wishes in regards to "personhood" and the outlawing of abortion nationwide."
And what if a visitor arrives from another country, gets raped by a US citizen, ends up in hospital for months and wants to abort, let alone their own women.
Temo: Re: How does the US Christian Churches justify the change in policy?
(V): They figure Romney will forward their agenda when he gets elected anyway.McCain had a backbone and wouldn't be as likely to cave to their wishes in regards to "personhood" and the outlawing of abortion nationwide.
Ten federal immigration agents have filed suit against Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano claiming recent directives are forcing them to break the law and ignore their duties when it comes to deporting illegal immigrants.
The suit was filed Thursday in Texas federal court by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials. It challenges recent directives allowing some illegal immigrants -- particularly non-felons and those who came to the U.S. as children -- to stay and, in some cases, get work permits.
The suit, obtained by Fox News, says the agents are being forced to "violate federal law." It says the new directive "unconstitutionally usurps and encroaches upon the legislative powers of Congress." ICE Director John Morton is also named as a defendant.
Kris Kobach, lead attorney on the case, equated the move to give thousands of illegal immigrants a reprieve to the failed Fast and Furious gun-walking operation. [More...]
I hope the outcome of this has a happy ending as this administration is definitely not going to be pleased.
I mean.. it was interesting when at an RC school to hear from the monks and sisters who studied Religious history honesty, when it came to how the RC Church had badly behaved.
I think they wanted to warn us against 'people of the book'
Iamon lyme: Jules likes to bash Christians and so does the Col. And if one Christian does it, or one Christian organization does it, they lump them altogether. Such deep thinkers.
(V): For someone who does not believe in God, you seem strangely interested in what He does or doesn't do. I've seen this with other atheists, and it doesn't make sense. When I was an atheist, it never occurred to me that I should be concerned about a God that doesn't exist. I wasn't worried about Christians, because for the most part I could see them practicing what they preached. I could be among them, and even argue with them, but I never perceived them as any kind of threat.
On the other hand, if I was among other atheists I quickly learned not to argue with any of them, because if I did it could get ugly and sometimes even unsafe.
It's a little disconcerting when people are promoting peace in a violent way, and I know that at any moment it could spill over to where I am standing. That was a never a problem when I was among Christians. So you can point and cry out "hypocrite" all you want, it doesn't matter to me. I learned a long time ago how hypocrites behave.
... How does the US Christian Churches justify the change in policy?
Yes, I say policy, for if the idea that Mormonism is Satanism is not a solid 'biblical' statement from God. If it was, then Mormonism would still be as a solid law from God... SaTaNiSm.
But now, the Churches are split... some say yes, some not, some are undecided..
Obama uses one wrong word and the Conservatives here behave like rabid dogs... But... shhhh that's allowed... because only conservatives have the right to moan endlessly in the US...
(kaŝi) Atendante vian vicon, klaku "ŝanĝi" apud la vorto "Reŝarĝi" sur la ĉefpaĝo, poste ŝanĝu "Regenera periodo ..." al ekz. 30 sekundoj por ke via vico estu montrata pli rapide. (Servant) (Montri ĉiujn konsilojn)