Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
Listo de diskutaj forumoj
Vi ne rajtas afiŝi mesaĝojn en ĉi tiu forumo. La minimuma necesa nivelo de la membreco por afiŝi mesaĝojn en ĉi tiu forumo estas Brain-Peono.
If anyone here can produce video footage or solid photographic evidence of a Boeing hitting the Pentagon or wrecked at the Pentagon, please by all means do so.
Bwild: One has to go very deep into any conspiracy theory regarding 911. It would be one thing if only one plane were involved, but 4? And there are clear images that prove that flight 77 did in fact hit the Pentagon. But conspiracy theorists want to keep the conspiracy alive so they discount the evidence. Here's a good example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTNRkb7AaQk&feature=related
I remain skeptable. I agree it's fair to ask questions but if one poses those questions as conclusions, that's where I leave. Asking me is one thing, telling me is another. There are two sides to the story and I find the non-conspiracy explaination more credible.
(kaŝi) Se vi volas esti ĉiam avertita pri la lasta afiŝo en forumo, vi povas ricevi la afiŝo jn en via novaĵ-kliento klakante la RSS-simbolon supre dekstre en ĉiu forumo. (pauloaguia) (Montri ĉiujn konsilojn)