Yes, that would be right IF both players had an equal chance of winning the game. At least in 5-in-line this S-B system only makes an already very unfair system even worse.
As I mentioned earlier, with optimal play the one making the first move should always win in 5-in-line. Now if there are 2 very good players in the section, the one getting to play white against the other already has a really HUGE advantage. If we add S-B points we have a situation in which the other player cannot even compensate his bad luck of having to play black by winning all the other games even if the other good player lost one game against a lesser player.
And of course this 15x15 board (which is the best size, don`t get me wrong about that) compared to IYT`s 13x13 makes the white`s advantage even bigger.
So in this tournament system even the best player needs luck to win a section. For example, I`m not THE best 5-in-line player in the world, but I`d really like my chances against a world champion in a BrainKing 5-in-line tournament. That is, if I got lucky and got white in my game against him.

If the only game you win is against a player who wins 4 games in the section, your S-B will be 4. But if you also beat someone who wins 2 games in the section, your S-B will now be 6. It is kind of like a more accurate determination of the winner - if 2 players get the same number of wins, but one beats the other, that person should be the winner. This takes that into account :-)

ok, I am just used to sites where if you tie you both move to the next round!

Is this like a count back situation, which is used in some sporting competition?

No, not the points in the actual game.
I dont think it really goes against you, if you beat someone who had won no other games, maybe because they signed up and never came back to the site, but the other player had beat someone who had won all their other games, then they would get a higher S-B than you. That seems fair to me.
And if you both had the same S-B then you would both go through, presumably!
Of course it counts all the games you have won, each player you beat, their games would decide your S-B.
A bit like when deciding your BKR the other players rating is the deciding factor.
When deciding the S-B, the other players games are taken into account.

I think so, I thought he meant the points in each game itsself, then it seems like it would be close to impossible to have more then one winner in a section? And if you are a higher rated player then it goes against you? Doesn't seem fair to me! But thanks for explaining it

alexlee, I think it means that if you and one other player get, say, 5 points each, the S-B points will come into consideration.
So the players you beat, THEIR points will be added up (the games they won) and this is the S-B for you.
In other words, if you beat good players and they won most of their other games, you'll have the higher S-B than the other player if the people they beat didn't do so good overall.
Its like a ratings system, so the actual game type doesn't matter.
Does all that make sense?!!

So what your saying is even if you tie with "normal" points you do not go to the next round if someone else has higher S-B points?
I really do not understand how you can have
S-B points in a spider game?

Actually, S-B is only used when two or more players finish a tournament with the same "normal" points. See The first official BK tourney, Reversi 6x6. There are three winning players from the same section because they have the same both "normal" and "S-B" points.

Do the Sonne-Born points have any other meaning regarding who won? If it is a 3 way tie in a section do all 3 go on to the next round?

macoan: You must wait only for your section to be finished. There is only one game left, it won't take too long. This is the free membership limitation.
rabbitoid: It means Sonne-Born points. It is a total sum of points of your opponents who lost a game with you and a half of points of your opponents who drawn a game with you.
alexlee: See your message box.
mcinturff: Only your section counts, until you are a winner and go to the next round. Once the section is finished, you are free for another tourney of the same game type.

if we have to wait for all the rounds to be done to the final winner ..we will only be able to play 1 tourney a year and that sure won't help out the fellowship i'm on ..or am i misunderstanding and its till your elimanated from a tourney ..which still won't be much help either ..it would be nicer if you could just limit how many tourneies instead of one tourney per game ..as for me as i don't play all the games just a few types and i'm sure that there are a lot of people in the same boat ..can we swap lol just joking on that ..the way it stands i'm hurting my fellowship by staying as i can't help them out

I am also waiting to find out if a knight can play in a fellowship tourn if they are playing in another tourn of the same type?

Does anyone know - Do I have to wait for BOTH sections of a tournament to finnish before I can sign up for a new tournament?

Since I'm limited to one tournament, it will not let me sign up for any new tournaments. It keeps saying that I'm playing in a current tournament (even though all MY game are done, and I DO NOT have enough points to go to the next round) - UGH! Do I have to wait for the next round to be finnished also???? THAT WILL STINK if I have to wait that long! UGH!!!!

er... so does nobody know what this s-b coloumn in the tournament results stands for?

Hiya everyone, I'm still a few players short for some of the games in my tourney to run. Mainly some of the chess and checkers variants, also anti line four and tank battle.
This tourney starts on Tuesday and I'd like to get as many players as possible (hey, at least four!!) for as many games as possible! So if you haven't signed up already for some of these great games then you only have until Tuesday!! Happy playing!! :o)

Signups are open for Fast Backgammon (3) and Fast Nackgammon (2). Games in both are 1 day moves. start Feb 20th and are open to all players!

You are lucky, I've just wanted to disconnect but I've seen the "new posts" sign in the last second ;-)

LOL...its ok, we appreciate what you are doing! and thanks for the quick response :-)

You know, when I created the code for the very first tournament, it was designed mostly for myself only because I had to test it. So that's why I perfectly know where to find everything and it can be confusing to normal users :-) I will add some hints to the tournament pages.

lol...ok I just found it...simply by clicking everything clickable on the page..now I know its there it will be easy...and hopefully everyone else will read this..thanks for your help :-)

dream: Okay, and when you are there, click on "back to the list of game types" and there is the button. I know that it is not very intuitive to find it, I will improve it later.

i did that Fencer. I just went and checked, I went to the fellowship, clicked on the tournament and it shows me a grid with all the players names layed out, like a regular tournament which has started would, there is nothing else to click.

dream: You have only prepared the tournament. When I look at the database, the current status is WAITING. You must go up one level [from your tournament page] to the "list of all tournament" and click on "Start this tournament".

Fencer, I just started our first fellowship tournament. It all went ok, just like a regular tournament, and shows the standings like a regular tournament would...only problem is there are no games? It should have generated 8 backgammon games, but there are none at all on my game sheet. Can you help please?

I can't enter ours dream???

maybe this has been already answered, if so - sorry

what does the s-b coloumn signify?

I was in the Fast Nack (1) (Nackgammon) tournament, and I'm now done with all my games. I already know I will not make it to the next round, but there are still other players in the section with games to play.

So now it will not let me sign up for a new tournament even though I have finished all my games in the section.

Do I have to wait for the other players in the section to complete their games, or will I be able to sign up for a new tournament before then????

Thanks

I read all suggestions and I make notes almost daily :-) But I have to put them to a task queue and postpone most of them. It is impossible to work on everything at once. Moreover, if I want to change some feature, it requires lots of tests and it simply cannot be released immediately.

Please do remember that a vital objective for Fencer is to make this site pay for itself.

I like that Idea, I would rather playu in tou rnaments than open games buy We are not even done with the first rouns of the first tourny yet, I am being punished by players that only make one move a week. (not complaning)

Just a suggestion.
I have a few members in my fellowship who are brainknights, thus can only play in 1 tournament of a kind, at a time. This means that if they are in an open backgammon tournament then they cannot enter a fellowship backgammon one. This is a little disappointing for them. It will be even more so when inter fellowship tournaments begin. (and make it harder for fellowships to make up a team)
May I suggest that perhaps instead of limiting them to participating in only one tournament game type at a time that instead they can play whatever game type they like to say a total of 30 games (that number is off the top of my head) This offers much more flexibility especially for those players who only play 1 or 2 game types.

Can anyone help me....I am in a tourney with only one tourney game in progress at the mo., & I have 4 empty spaces for new games left, am I able to take on any more new games, or do I have to leave these spaces open ready for the next round of the tourney? (I dont want to go over my max. & not be allowed into the next round) :o)

It answers mine too..thanks!

Signups for the first ever Sundance Tournament (Five in line) close tomorrow!
If you haven`t signed in yet, proceed urgently to "Tournaments" page!
Btw. Good luck to all players (myself included :)).

Thanks Fencer. That answers my question.:)

The creator of a prize tournament gives all prizes. It means that if you create a tournament and promise one-year Brain Rook membership for the winner, you have to purchase it and then let me know which user I should activate. That's all :-)

kevin: sure peple could cheat like this, I would think Fencer would notice something like this don't you?

Thanks Kevin.:)

dream: I would assume you have to provide it for the winner! Otherwise, what if even someone made a tournament, their friend made 4 accounts, signed up all 4, and won a membership with the one they wanted! All at no cost to anyone! lol :-)

Ian: I'm pretty sure Fencer just needs their ID, which is found on their profile to apply the membership :-)

I am pretty sure that i have missed a reply to a similer question but will ask anyway.
In a prize tournament organised by a member, in which a 6/12mth paid membership is offered to the the winner. Would`t there be a need for the winner to have to disclose personal details in order for the organiser to complete the payment details form.?

Fencer: its not quite clear who pays for the membership prize, would I pay for it or does the site provide the prize?

Thanks all, for your help. I understand now that I must finish one before being allowed to start another of ANY type. I thought it was one per category. Sorry, dream, but there was no sign that it was an Open Tournament on the main board, so I assumed it was not. My bad, sorry...:)

now when we go into the tourneys and look at the tourneys that are runnin we see the ones (games)that we signed up for it says that.,..anyways when the sections are finshed can it either be put there finished or (F) for fininshed or section won by..and their name..or like the differnet rounds have it rd1 finished...rd 2 (f) then the winners name..something along those lines..this way we dont have to go into each and every tourney to see its current status...

you are right Dream an OPEN tourney is just that. Non paying players can enter provided they are not already in a tourney of that type and must wait until that tourney is completely finished before entering another of that type

Thats correct dream.

The Fast Backgammon (2) that I am running is open to paid or not...but I believer you can only play in 1 at a time if you are not a member, someone may be able to clarify this

I am not a "paid" member, so I can neither join the existing gammon tournament, nor can I set one up. I believe Fencer would have to do that...

What exactly do you mean by "Open" Spoker?

I really think it unfair that there is not (1) open backgammon tournament.
It would do you good to start one, so you see how many people you really entice at your site.
I'll check back later....Spoker