Nombre de Usuario: Contraseña:
Registro de un Nuevo Usuario
Moderador: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Mensajes por página:
Lista de boletines
No tienes autorización para escribir mensajes en este boletín. Para escribir mensajes en este boletín se require un nivel mínimo de membresía de Brain Caballo.
Modo: Todo el mundo puede escribir
Buscar entre los mensajes:  

<< <   467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476   > >>
4. Enero 2005, 12:01:08
Jason 
Asunto: PAWNS
I believe they will still have thier own rating still ,which they can see ....but just not on a table ? . if thats the case all pawns can still see what position they have on a table ..just that they wont be visible on the table , this is a good idea (in my opinion ) there are alot of pawns that will never upgrade no matter ,but as soon as any pawn upgrades they would appear on the list .

4. Enero 2005, 11:49:51
Hrqls 
thats why we are discussing .. instead of



4. Enero 2005, 11:49:12
Fencer 
As I said, it's just a proposal, not a definitive conclusion. Otherwise I wouldn't waste my time with a discussion.

4. Enero 2005, 11:48:14
Hrqls 
*nod* i was a pawn not too long ago (oh time flies! ;)) ... i love rankings .. not just the points but the position compared to other players .. i am not sure if i would like a game site without a ranking

but i also love a fast database :) .. and the fee isnt that high ...

4. Enero 2005, 11:41:40
pauloaguia 
There is one thing I'm not sure I got: pawns already don't have access to charts. When you say remove us from the charts you mean remove us our rating position with relation to others. We just get to keep a ranking, not a rating, is that it?

Pawns will also loose some competitiveness. Comparing yourself to others is a very big incentive to try to play better. So you'll risk diminishing the number of pawns on this site that are here just for the competition and that usually make good opponents.
Also, I bet some paying members would prefer to compare their position in a universe of 10000 players rather than in one of 1000.

Another thing: what will happen when a paying member stops paying? disappear from the charts? Or when a pawn that has already an established ranking finally decides to become a paying member? Suddenly show up?
Ratings might become a bit more unstable then what they are already today...

Of course, it would also diminish the time I spend on the rating listings, comparing myself to others ;)

4. Enero 2005, 11:33:13
rabbitoid 
Asunto: Re: Rating charts
Fencer:

yes: as a negative consequence, a lot of high rated pawns getting disgusted with the site too early ( = before making the decision to go "paid") and going elsewhere. the internet is big.

4. Enero 2005, 11:31:38
Fencer 
Phew, everybody knows this most popular BK page.

4. Enero 2005, 11:27:28
cariad 
Yes. You forgot a link to 'Paid Membership'.

4. Enero 2005, 11:25:43
Fencer 
Asunto: Rating charts
There was an idea of removing all non-paying members from the charts. They will be allowed to have BKRs but they won't be calculated for chart positions.

Positive consequences:
  • Significantly decreased number of position cheaters.
  • Another reason why to pay :-)
  • Decreasing the database server overload.
  • Significant improving of chart positions of paying members :-D


Negative consequences:
  • My message box flooded by complaints from pawns.
  • Shorter charts.


Did I forget something?

4. Enero 2005, 08:46:01
Bernice 
Asunto: Poetic Licence hehehe
There is only one man on this site
Who has the chance to censor
I just cant remember his name
But im sure it went something like Fencer


can anyone add to this.....

OKOKOKOK....OK off topic

3. Enero 2005, 17:35:18
damamaster 
Hı greeting for all . I saw there is a rule mistake in turkish checkers ı request managers of this site to correct this rule. by

3. Enero 2005, 14:25:19
Stevie 
nah...it was deja vu Brian LOL

3. Enero 2005, 14:24:07
Brian1971 
Asunto: Re: Re deja vu effect
Stevie: Possibly in the Back To The Future movies from the 1980s. Michael J. Fox and Christopher LLoyd travel through time in 3 movies in a Delorean.

3. Enero 2005, 12:00:50
Stevie 
Asunto: Re: Re deja vu effect
Fencer: Im sure Ive heard that before somewhere




3. Enero 2005, 11:48:16
Fencer 
Asunto: Re: Re deja vu effect
rhiannon: Each time I am more and more experienced with this time travelling.

3. Enero 2005, 11:43:17
Bry 
lol - i've just asked the same thing re deja vu... thought it was me

3. Enero 2005, 11:42:24
rhiannon 
Asunto: Re deja vu effect
Fencer: Could you take me back to before my last University History paper? I sure as heck would like to do that one again.

3. Enero 2005, 08:52:32
Fencer 
BerniceC: No, only when a year changes. Next "clearing" will happen as of 1st January 2006. Or maybe not, if we manage to get a new database server first :-)

3. Enero 2005, 06:39:34
Bernice 
Asunto: Re: Bug?
Fencer:
thanks Fencer ;) are you going to be clearing this regularly....like each month? or so?

3. Enero 2005, 06:36:07
Fencer 
Asunto: Re: Bug?
BerniceC: It shows last 10 finished games from the current year only, in order to save database server resources.

3. Enero 2005, 05:50:37
Bernice 
Asunto: Re: Bug?
BuilderQ:
:) thanks .....gosh i must lose a lot in a hurry HAHAHAHAHA

I put it on the bug board as well so can someone delete it please :)

3. Enero 2005, 05:45:06
BuilderQ 
Asunto: Re: Bug?
The "Last 10 finished games" only includes those finished in the current year.

3. Enero 2005, 05:38:59
Bernice 
Asunto: Bug?
looking at my Friends online profiles, it appears that none of them have finished 10 games.

looking at the "last finished 10 games" one of them only has one game showing and another of them only has 6 games showing, but looking at my own profile 10 games are showing as being finished...can anyone understand that LOLOL

2. Enero 2005, 17:39:57
Baked Alaskan 
Asunto: Re:
Rose:

ok TY

2. Enero 2005, 17:34:22
Rose 
When you pay make mention about the brains and you will get them!

2. Enero 2005, 17:30:54
Baked Alaskan 
Asunto: Brains
If I pay for someones membership will I get the brains or does my friend have to pay and then I get the brains?


I would like to give someone a gift membership but still receive my brains.


2. Enero 2005, 14:14:23
Eriisa 
Asunto: Downtime is done?
Wow, I must have slept through it all!

2. Enero 2005, 08:19:21
Bernice 
Asunto: Re:
Fencer:
Happy moving...

2. Enero 2005, 08:13:27
Fencer 
BerniceC: Almost :-) The database moves will happen tonight [of our time].

2. Enero 2005, 08:04:24
Bernice 
Asunto: Fencer
Modificado por Bernice (2. Enero 2005, 08:05:25)
OK :) game time is no longer suspended....does that mean you have cleaned out all your closets, saved all the ancient bits and we are finally a GO for 2005???

1. Enero 2005, 21:32:32
Summer Flame 
Congrats bumble, you have your work cut out 2 sets of twins and now triplets, wow what a man, Happy new year :)

1. Enero 2005, 20:28:39
Expired 
OK ....

1. Enero 2005, 20:26:33
harley 
Oh don't make me say it! Its off topic

1. Enero 2005, 20:24:20
Expired 
Yes, BUT WHAT harley?

1. Enero 2005, 20:20:07
harley 
Aww I hate to break up this conversation, but...

1. Enero 2005, 20:08:18
Expired 
how does it feel being a DADDY, bumble?

1. Enero 2005, 20:06:39
bumble 
Sorry they're all sleeping in the pic. I'll try and take one when they're all awake at the same time. Probably 3am....

1. Enero 2005, 20:02:52
Expired 
I wish all troubles were like those.

1. Enero 2005, 20:01:50
Expired 
thanks for the info both Stevi eand Rose.
Good word to ad to my vocabulary knowledge!

TRIPLETS

1. Enero 2005, 20:00:53
rod03801 
I think they had their hands full before the triplets, even! LOL

1. Enero 2005, 20:00:50
bumble 
I think they're called trouble.

1. Enero 2005, 19:59:10
Rose 
Asunto: Re:
reza: They call em triplets! Boy do they have thier hands full!!

1. Enero 2005, 19:58:57
Stevie 
Asunto: Re:
reza: Triplets mate :o)

1. Enero 2005, 19:57:43
Expired 
hey hey hey. Buble congratulations. I know when someone has two kids, they're called twins but don't know what you call them if they're three!

Little nice babies. How sweet. Give them a kiss for me.

1. Enero 2005, 19:46:39
Expired 
Asunto: Re: Thanks!
bumble: I was wondering if bumble could put a photo of the baby on hi sprofile so that we all could see how nice that kid is.

I love babies ......... --- tears of happiness these are.

1. Enero 2005, 13:59:38
bumble 
Asunto: Thanks!
A huge 'THANK YOU' to everyone that sent their good wishes to panda, myself and our new baby girls.
As you can appreciate, I don't have enough time to reply to everyone individually at the moment - so I hope this reaches everyone.
Thanks, guys, it means a lot and I'll convey all your sentiments to Krista and the girls - Cristyn, Bethan and Siân. All are doing extremely well and will be home, hopefully, around the middle of January.
Necessity, they say, is the mother of invention so I'm going to drape saddlebags over the computer monitor and deposit 1 girl in each bag and have the other in one arm - leaving one free hand for the mouse.

HAPPY NEW YEAR EVERYONE!

1. Enero 2005, 11:26:14
wekke 
Asunto: Headache
But still a Happy New Year to all Brainking Members. And hope Fencer will continue to do a great job on this great site. :)

1. Enero 2005, 06:55:44
ellieoop 
Asunto: Re: Down time
HAPPY NEW YEAR

1. Enero 2005, 06:48:26
Artful Dodger 
Happy new Year Fencer. ;)

Two hours ten minutes countdown for us here in Pacific Northwest.

1. Enero 2005, 06:34:57
Bernice 
Asunto: Re: Down time
Fencer:
and the same to you

<< <   467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476   > >>
Fecha y hora
Amigos conectados
Foros favoritos
Comunidades
Consejo del día
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, todos los derechos reservados.
Volver a arriba