Nombre de Usuario: Contraseña:
Registro de un Nuevo Usuario
Moderador: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Mensajes por página:
Lista de boletines
No tienes autorización para escribir mensajes en este boletín. Para escribir mensajes en este boletín se require un nivel mínimo de membresía de Brain Caballo.
Modo: Todo el mundo puede escribir
Buscar entre los mensajes:  

<< <   500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509   > >>
3. Noviembre 2004, 20:22:50
Universal Eyes 
Everyone can't be on 24hrs a day that is what moderators are for!

3. Noviembre 2004, 20:07:26
sLaMdAnCe13 
a sAd dAy 4 aMeRiCa.

3. Noviembre 2004, 12:56:42
ughaibu 
I'm not human so. . . . . . you?

3. Noviembre 2004, 12:54:26
Chessmaster1000 
Human beings consist of 10^14 selfish cells that only care for their own replication.
So how would you expect a human not to be selfish and be able to accept others different opinions, from their own?

Also don't forget that our DNA carries many common elements from our "wild-acting" animals. Our behaviour in general of course is not like hyenas, but sometimes............

3. Noviembre 2004, 12:13:23
NOT a floosie 
How about if everyone acted like adults and then there wouldn't be a need for moderators.

3. Noviembre 2004, 08:02:09
Walter Montego 
Asunto: Moderator's toolbox need
How's 'bout being able to have certain people's posts require approval and everyone else's be posted? I now I could've used such a feature a few days back. Though such a thing would probably be ripe for abuse in the wrong hands too. It'd still be better than banning someone and deleting their posts.

3. Noviembre 2004, 04:28:37
bwildman 
good point chuck...how many moderators would allow someone to call them"FB"?

3. Noviembre 2004, 04:08:17
Czuch 
Who would do it that is not partial?

3. Noviembre 2004, 04:01:26
Purple 
Asunto: Re:
Well said Long John

3. Noviembre 2004, 03:58:58
LongJohn 
he has a point though, it is ridiculous theat Stevie and his puppet Rose are moderating a BK board. All public boards should be moderated by impartial moderators and we all know that they are NOT impartial

"This is a BK issue and therefore belongs on this boards"

3. Noviembre 2004, 02:56:22
Czuch 
Kinda hard to have a discussion that way LOL
Why not just ban the offenders instead of making everybody pay for their indiscretions.

When I have posted something unfit for print, I get banned, the whole board does not suffer.

3. Noviembre 2004, 02:47:24
NOT a floosie 
They are held until a moderator comes on and either approves them or deletes them.

3. Noviembre 2004, 02:35:12
Czuch 
If you want, I will moderate that one :)

I want to know how you can have a public board where all posts must be approved, yet there is no one online to approve them?

3. Noviembre 2004, 02:12:45
NOT a floosie 
Ok, enough! This is the BK board, not the General Arguments and Aggrivation Board.

3. Noviembre 2004, 02:08:32
Tulip 
Hmmmmm???..nasty post there UE?...

3. Noviembre 2004, 00:05:53
Universal Eyes 
Just ask Hannelore.

2. Noviembre 2004, 17:13:50
Purple 
Asunto: Re:
Sure but it hasn't gotten Slam restored yet.

2. Noviembre 2004, 17:12:52
bwildman 
being a moderator is tough sometimes,huh?

2. Noviembre 2004, 17:12:22
Artful Dodger 
ahhhh hadn't thought of that one...thanks Purple

2. Noviembre 2004, 17:11:55
Skyking 
Oh.Thought I was being banned Like Slam LOL If I get banned Purple can you make me a Fellowship? LOL

2. Noviembre 2004, 17:10:06
Purple 
Asunto: Re:
These are attempted posts by hidden users. They are hidden for extreme pornography an are still trying to post.

2. Noviembre 2004, 17:09:54
Artful Dodger 
how many people do you have on hide??

2. Noviembre 2004, 17:07:40
Skyking 
I'm not able to see anything in Jokes and I get red numbers?

2. Noviembre 2004, 06:16:40
bwildman 
LOL:)

2. Noviembre 2004, 06:13:10
MindyzTaken 
Asunto: Re: QUESTION
Thanks again

2. Noviembre 2004, 06:13:06
Artful Dodger 
hope Fencer looks at bwild's post then ... in the boiler room....

it's been copied if he decides to zap it

2. Noviembre 2004, 06:10:38
ScarletRose 
Asunto: Re: QUESTION
Yes.. it is not allowed to give out someone elses true name to their ID.. They can do it themselves.. if they wish..

2. Noviembre 2004, 06:03:42
MindyzTaken 
Asunto: QUESTION
Is there a rule here about exposing someones "real name" here publicly??
I mean,,Some people here use different names here because they do not want their real name to be known by everybody on here...

2. Noviembre 2004, 03:46:41
The Listener 
Or we all continue to smell the glove... Dream on :P

2. Noviembre 2004, 03:40:07
Czuch 
Unless the Government gives the lazy lot a handout ;)

2. Noviembre 2004, 03:15:48
The Listener 
A lazy lot makes less cents than a busy boo-cannon :P

2. Noviembre 2004, 03:09:22
Czuch 
LOL... we are a lazy lot :)

2. Noviembre 2004, 03:01:10
Eriisa 
yep, that's true. I have to click on the fellowship and then the discussion board. LOL. half the time, I decide to wait til someone else posts!

2. Noviembre 2004, 01:33:12
Czuch 
Yes, the fellowship is listed, but the board only has a link if there is a new message. Sometimes I want to post to a fellowship board when there is no new messages, and in that case there is no direct link to the board from our main page.

1. Noviembre 2004, 23:28:16
Eriisa 
The Fellowships are listed in red numbers next to the Fellowship board under boards. You do not need to add them since they are automatically there.......

1. Noviembre 2004, 23:25:21
WizardII 
Asunto: Add to Favorites
I can see the Add to Favorites on boards like this one but I can't see them any more for Fellowships. Where did it go?

1. Noviembre 2004, 16:19:34
Tulip 
Asunto: Big thanks to Rose!
thanks rosie for showing me how to set auto vacation!!..silly me never knew it was there ;o)

1. Noviembre 2004, 15:23:54
Tulip 
no....my server went off so i couldnt get here..good ole' NTL ;o)

1. Noviembre 2004, 15:22:27
Fencer 
Did you turn it on?

1. Noviembre 2004, 15:17:58
Tulip 
i was off site for 3 days (last wed to saturday)...no auto vacation kicked in for me?..i timed out in 21 games ;o(

1. Noviembre 2004, 14:19:05
LongJohn 
I thought it was like that, the puzzling thing to me though is that if someones timeout triggers it and there was another game to time out an hour later, I would have expected the game with an hour to immediately change to 25 hours since the vacation day has already been marked. Instead, the system still lets the 1 hour to go game run down and then bops it up by 24 hours.
This is good but unexpected

1. Noviembre 2004, 14:03:39
Fencer 
The system checks for the normal vacation first. If the day is not marked as a vacation or weekend, it tries to use the auto vacation.
It means that once the day is marked by the auto vacation feature, it is a normal vacation for the rest of games.

1. Noviembre 2004, 13:59:41
LongJohn 
Asunto: Auto Vacation
how does the auto vacation thing work for mutiple timeouts.
ie If my game with klokan is about to time out now, and then does but his auto vacation kicks in and extends the game length by a day, does it subtract one day vacation off his remaining total?
If so (I assume it must) what happens to the next person on the list 1 hour laters whos game times out with Klokan and then gets extended? Surely the system wouldnt charge him 2 days for the extension. but I have noticed in all cases that the system will always wait for the time to drop to minus time before extending.

Can you shed some light on how this works Fencer?

Note that I am Pro auto vacations and this is by no means a complaint, but it would just be so handy to see how many vacation days left someone has. I think this should be publicly viewable as it is not private information and effects no one.

Thanks

31. Octubre 2004, 22:40:23
Andersp 
Harley..of course you should go "trick or treat" :)
My point is that deleting his posts doesnt help..banning for at least 1 month or its the same soon again.

31. Octubre 2004, 22:37:37
harley 
Andersp, its not very often that we go SO off topic, and its not every day that I have to delete posts. Its unfortunate that its halloween, I've been out with children 'trick or treating' so I wasn't here like I usually would have been. We do our best to keep this board clean and on topic :o)

31. Octubre 2004, 22:32:20
Andersp 
...and tomorrow we have the same old song again :(

31. Octubre 2004, 21:44:54
Skyking 
Everytime it's off topic we are told to take it to General Chat

31. Octubre 2004, 21:43:39
harley 
I'm deleting all off topics now, IM. Applied evenly I hope.

31. Octubre 2004, 21:40:12
Czuch 
It seems that being "off topic" and "personal attack" are good reasons to delete a post. But they are not applied evenly to all posters.

I suggest a safe way to use discretion when moderating, and not come accross like a hypocrit, is to simply say that you are removing a post due to your discretion, and quit using the PC friendly "off topic" etc, cause once you post that as a reason for one removal, it technically must apply to all. So sad :(

<< <   500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509   > >>
Fecha y hora
Amigos conectados
Foros favoritos
Comunidades
Consejo del día
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, todos los derechos reservados.
Volver a arriba