Nombre de Usuario: Contraseña:
Registro de un Nuevo Usuario
Moderador: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Mensajes por página:
Lista de boletines
No tienes autorización para escribir mensajes en este boletín. Para escribir mensajes en este boletín se require un nivel mínimo de membresía de Brain Caballo.
Modo: Todo el mundo puede escribir
Buscar entre los mensajes:  

<< <   529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538   > >>
4. Septiembre 2004, 18:09:16
Niki 
Asunto: Froglet.. random placement ??
Am I correct in thinking that the pieces are placed randomly in froglet ? It's just that I've noticed 2 of my games in the same tournament have what appears to be the same layout.. games 447881 and 447884

4. Septiembre 2004, 10:05:17
ScarletRose 
Oh drats!! hehe.. that explains it..

4. Septiembre 2004, 10:03:46
Stevie 
You are meant to jump the frogs, not the opponents LMAO

4. Septiembre 2004, 10:01:39
ScarletRose 
Asunto: Frogger.. Oh bugs!!
Is anyone else noticing lack of scores in their froglet games?

4. Septiembre 2004, 09:53:26
Stevie 
Asunto: Re: Kevin
Modificado por Stevie (4. Septiembre 2004, 10:59:30)
Because Myself and a couple of others are a thorn in the side of management LOL

We say what we feel and tell what we think, rather than say what others want us to say or say things to [bad language edited].....Brown nose

*edited to put my post right after editing by Harley to remove not swearing bad language...go figure*

4. Septiembre 2004, 03:20:00
ughaibu 
Asunto: Big Bad Wolf
Thanks. That's a wonderful resource, I'm thinking of timing out if the bug isn't corrcted in time but if such a possibility is available I wouldn't like to seem churlish.

4. Septiembre 2004, 02:13:33
Kevin 
Steve: Why do you think we'd pick you for the a-h of the week?

3. Septiembre 2004, 21:02:43
coan.net 
Asunto: Tournament Starter
Modificado por coan.net (3. Septiembre 2004, 21:03:56)
The tournament starting process has been acting very strange the past day or so.

Take for example my "Fast Start Froglet" tournament. Currenlty as I write this, #1-6 has started, #7 & #8 are in the waiting stage, and #9 has started (passing up #7 & #8)

& a couple of others are "stuck" in the waiting games section - will add this to Bug Tracker.

3. Septiembre 2004, 18:28:39
Artful Dodger 
Asunto: Re: LongJohn
I disagree. I think the paid users here can expect to know what is done when someone not only opens an additional account but accepts a membership for that account. Like it or not, Long John played in a pawn tourney with his QWERTY account and won a membership. I think this IS a matter for all of us to know what is being done. It violates more than the user agreement. Or is there no teeth there?

3. Septiembre 2004, 18:25:27
Fencer 
Handling multiple accounts and possible multiple accounts is my problem and I am not going to discuss about it.

3. Septiembre 2004, 16:30:48
coan.net 
1) I agree with harley that you should let Fencer handle it. He knows about the problem, and will deal with it (if needed to be dealt with) in his own time frame. [If he takes too long, people complain. If he steps up and removed people & Fellowships quickly, people also complain. no win situation for Fencer!] He has always dealt with issues like this in the past, but sometimes it takes awile.

I actually have 2 test accounts that I have used: 001 & 002. 001 is the only that I mostly use, but had to have 002 one time when I was testing a bug which let pawns play in Fellowship tournaments. (fixed now). I don't even use these accounts for practice, just for trying to find bugs to keep Fencer busy! :-)

3. Septiembre 2004, 16:29:57
Czuch 
Asunto: Re:
One thing am not assuming is that I personally know 3 people who have admitted to having multiple accounts without special permission, and this has been the case for a long time now. IMO it is not the impression that this site wants to make when the user agreement prohibits it.

I think one problem for Fencer is that he simply does not delete any accounts at all. There are hundreds of abandoned accounts here, and Fencer cannot delete them without making his membership ranks shrink, so deleting these multiple accounts is not in his best interest, and neither is kicking out a paying member. so even thought the user agreement prohibits it, my guess is that unless the user is proven to be using the accounts to boost their ratings, it is in Fencers best interest to ignore the breach of the agreement.

3. Septiembre 2004, 16:20:04
Czuch 
Asunto: Re:
Modificado por Czuch (3. Septiembre 2004, 16:33:29)
BBW..what is the moniker for that account, and are all the games you play with it against yourself (BBW) and unrated? Or do you play with two seperate "test" accounts against each other?

Is it acceptable for us all to have sperate accounts to play test games with? I think it is a great idea to be able to practice different game strategies, where you dont have to play a game to completion etc.... I think everyone should be able to play 'practice' games in this manner, just to make it fair for all members....

3. Septiembre 2004, 16:16:28
harley 
You're assuming a lot, IM! We should 'assume' that Fencer has things in hand and knows what he's doing.

3. Septiembre 2004, 16:15:14
Czuch 
Asunto: Re:
So we should assume that even though there are many people who admitedly have multiple accounts without special permission, that it is still unacceptable to have them ourselves?

3. Septiembre 2004, 16:04:09
harley 
I would assume that either Fencer has dealt with the matter to his satisfaction and there are reasons the account has been left - or that Fencer is still dealing with it.

3. Septiembre 2004, 16:02:56
coan.net 
Yes, I was playing with a test account which Fencer knows about - which I don't play real games or real tournaments - and I even put in the description it is a test account. :-)

3. Septiembre 2004, 16:01:29
Czuch 
Asunto: Re: Backgammon Bug
How did you test it BBW? Are you playing against yourself with two accounts? LOL

3. Septiembre 2004, 15:59:39
Czuch 
Asunto: Re:
So, Harley, if we are not entitled to know what is being done, then all we can do is assume, and since people with more than one account are still here, and all their accounts are still here, we must assume that nothing has been done about them. If nothing is being done, then what is keeping others from doing more of the same?

3. Septiembre 2004, 15:42:18
coan.net 
Asunto: Backgammon Bug
In reply to: ughaibu (Backgammon bug - swap dice)

As a note, if you swap dice on your very first turn, it then thinks it's the opponents turn (Bug)

But if you do pass it, even if the opponent swaps, it will stay their turn. (I was playing and already tested that the other day.) The original bug still needs fixed, but it should not go into any loop or anything.

3. Septiembre 2004, 15:22:24
harley 
IM, why do you keep calling me 'management'? I have no say in these matters. Fencer and Liquid alone are 'management'.

Stevie, yes, I guess it DOES depend who they are since you openly admit to having 2 other accounts and nobody rips you apart for them.

IM, if you report a bug then I agree you would be entitled to hear the outcome of that report. However if you report a misdemeaner then your part is done and you should let Fencer get on with his part. Plastering it all over every board doesn't help. Have a little faith.

3. Septiembre 2004, 15:02:11
Czuch 
Asunto: Re:
Also, it truely IS a grey area when there are people who actually ADMIT to having multiple accounts, yet you (management) says it is UNACCEPTABLE! How can it be unacceptable and accepted at the same time?

3. Septiembre 2004, 14:58:04
Stevie 
Asunto: What is not acceptable to me is ANY member being torn apart in public over numerous boards
depends who and what they are "alledged" to have done

3. Septiembre 2004, 14:57:53
Czuch 
Asunto: Re:
The problem is that there have been reports to Fencer, but there have been no response to what, if any, action has been taken, I think that if I report a bug or problem,(including multiple account report) should be entitled to hear about any action tfrom that report, ie 'that report has been invewstigated, and there is not difinitive evidence, or it has been investigated, and found to be true, and such and such action has been taken, or this has been noted and is a situation with special circumstances' etc... Again, if we see what appears to be a breach of the rules, and we also see no consequences for this breach, then what is stopping everyone else from commiting the same violation?

3. Septiembre 2004, 14:50:00
Czuch 
OK...Just read your latest post Harley. Thanks for the clairification... The rule HAS been broken. Now if there are no consequences for a rule breach, it seems that would lead to more breaches.

Could you clairify for me please... are multiple accounts for one person prohibited, regardelss of whether or not they use them to cheat or if they are inactive? Thanks for any help :)

3. Septiembre 2004, 14:49:04
harley 
Its not a grey area. Read the user agreement, its quite clear, one account per person. Any more than one account is not acceptable. I don't find that a grey area.

What is not acceptable to me is ANY member being torn apart in public over numerous boards and a long time period for allegedly having more than one account.
If this is suspected, then it should be reported to Fencer and then left for him to deal with.

3. Septiembre 2004, 14:44:53
Czuch 
Asunto: Re:
As members, we need to know what is acceptable and what is not acceptable....some subjects are obvious, but when there is a grey area ie multiple accounts, it is important for it to be clairified by Fencer or some other member of management. It is also absolutly a concern for you as a member of said management.

3. Septiembre 2004, 14:43:05
Purple 
OK harley but it was a clever post. LOL

3. Septiembre 2004, 14:40:01
harley 
And just to reply directly to you, Bwild, multiple accounts is an appropriate subject for this board. (But not much of a conversation subject since the rules are simple - only ONE account per person.) But specific cases of where this rule has been broken is NOT a concern of the whole of BK.

3. Septiembre 2004, 14:31:28
harley 
Thats enough. I don't know anything about Long John and this alleged double account. I don't need to know because its not my business. Its none of your business either. If its been reported you can be certain that Fencer is dealing with it, or has dealt with it. There is no reason why he should post the sordid details to everyone. I would be grateful if you would delete your own posts here (the ones not concerning the subject).

3. Septiembre 2004, 14:22:45
Stevie 
Asunto: Not the brains...
They are ........"The management"

LOL

3. Septiembre 2004, 14:21:13
Andersp 
Asunto: Re: $25
Stevie..arent they the "Brains of Brain King"?
U have any better names?

3. Septiembre 2004, 14:20:07
Czuch 
Asunto: Re: LongJohn
Modificado por Czuch (3. Septiembre 2004, 15:14:30)
I agree with bwild harley... The members of this site do need to know if what it members are doing is acceptable, and if so is it acceptable for everyone, or are there special circumstances, or is it unacceptable. I personally am tired of hearing about it, and dont really care who has what accounts, or how they got them....but it is not going to go away until Fencer does something to make it go away.

3. Septiembre 2004, 14:19:13
Purple 
Asunto: Re:
There already is one. It's called The Cave.

3. Septiembre 2004, 14:18:32
Stevie 
Asunto: $25
With those three as jury, id be spending a fortune :o(

3. Septiembre 2004, 14:16:37
Andersp 
Me thinks a Bad behavior board is a brilliant idea.
Every week end a jury (Fencer, Harley and Kevin) decide who is the a-h off the week and he/she has to pay $ 25 as penalty.

Well..i thought (still do) that a-pass is brilliant too :(

3. Septiembre 2004, 14:14:02
Stevie 
Asunto: LJ
Thats right id 7929 and 8129

I have the cahoonies to not lie about them :o)

3. Septiembre 2004, 14:12:18
bwildman 
big difference,longjohn...those accounts werent boosted by a prize tourny.

3. Septiembre 2004, 14:11:05
LongJohn 
you mean Connor and Glenda?
LOL

3. Septiembre 2004, 14:11:04
bwildman 
pimple can moderate the "bad behaviour" board....he knows all about what it feels like to be banned for CHEATING!!

3. Septiembre 2004, 14:11:03
Stevie 
Family accounts Purple :o)
Just like the saprano's on here LOL

3. Septiembre 2004, 14:05:37
Stevie 
ooops sh...... oh pooh, sorry ;o)

3. Septiembre 2004, 14:03:44
Andersp 
Laughing at serious posts is very bad behavior Stevie!!! :)

3. Septiembre 2004, 14:02:39
Stevie 
LMAO

3. Septiembre 2004, 13:59:15
Andersp 
Asunto: Bad behavior
Why not a board called "Bad behavior".

There could all members who dont follow the rules be "nailed"..for example for using bad language, multiple accounts and of course the worse "crime" of all.. requesting auto-pass :)

3. Septiembre 2004, 13:56:19
bwildman 
Asunto: Re: LongJohn
I'm afraid I have to disagree.As a feature of BrainKing.com....only ONE account is allowed.unless I'm mistaken...this also has to do with the structure of BrainKig.com.
If one person is allowed to fool people and take advantage of the good will of prize tournies,designed to SUPPORT BRAINKING......then be kept "hush hush"...why not let everybody CHEAT!!!!

3. Septiembre 2004, 13:49:33
harley 
Asunto: LongJohn
IMupChucKing and anyone else who has posted about this - I feel it is a matter that should be dealt with in private between LongJohn and Fencer. It certainly isn't a matter for this board. Whatever Fencer is doing about it doesn't need to be broadcast for public interest. I would appreciate no more posts about this matter. Thank you.

3. Septiembre 2004, 13:21:07
Czuch 
Asunto: Fencer...
will you please do us all a favor, and weigh in publicly on the Long John / qwerty girl situation? It would be nice to put that subject to rest, one way or another...Thanks!

3. Septiembre 2004, 13:17:42
Czuch 
Asunto: Re:
Good points Kevin... also, total number of moves definitly should not be used.....

nother unsuggested idead is to measure it by the amount of people who will sign up for a non prize tournament, that seems to be a good indicator of popularity.

3. Septiembre 2004, 11:36:14
ughaibu 
The backgammon first roll bug is quite a problem. I've swapped dice and now the machine thinks I've lost the roll but if I pass the game to my opponent they'll probably also want to swap the dice and the whole palaver will continue ad infinitum.

<< <   529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538   > >>
Fecha y hora
Amigos conectados
Foros favoritos
Comunidades
Consejo del día
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, todos los derechos reservados.
Volver a arriba