Nombre de Usuario: Contraseña:
Registro de un Nuevo Usuario
Moderador: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Mensajes por página:
Lista de boletines
No tienes autorización para escribir mensajes en este boletín. Para escribir mensajes en este boletín se require un nivel mínimo de membresía de Brain Caballo.
Modo: Todo el mundo puede escribir
Buscar entre los mensajes:  

<< <   547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556   > >>
5. Abril 2009, 04:34:22
Papa Zoom 
Asunto: Re: Guess who?
Dolittle:yeah, but I think he just gave us permission to complain about stuff.  I can't think of anything right now tho.  lol

5. Abril 2009, 04:48:52
Nirvana 
Asunto: Re: Guess who?
Fencer: I can't speak for others ~ but YES this site is important to me

5. Abril 2009, 05:12:52
coan.net 
Asunto: Re: Guess who?
Artful Dodger: Good thing you aren't thinking about the so-called auto-pass feature that is currently on this site and not what a good auto-pass system would be such a great addition to the site.... because if you were thinking about that, then you might have something to complain about.

5. Abril 2009, 05:46:16
Papa Zoom 
Asunto: Re: Guess who?
coan.net:hmmmmm, auto pass.  Yeah, now that you mention it!  

5. Abril 2009, 15:36:43
"GERRY" 



Thank's FENCER & LIQUID for such a GREAT SITE:))))





5. Abril 2009, 17:58:52
"GERRY" 
Fencer thank's for the nice CUP i received today for BKR. Is this a new idea?:)))

5. Abril 2009, 17:59:04
Bwild 
Asunto: Re: Guess who?
Fencer: what new system?

5. Abril 2009, 18:41:00
rod03801 
Asunto: Re: Guess who?
Bwild: Look for the "Achievements" Tab on your profile.

5. Abril 2009, 18:43:39
Pedro Martínez 
Asunto: Re: Guess who?
rod03801: You can find the new vacation system under the Achievements tab?

5. Abril 2009, 18:45:15
rod03801 
Asunto: Re: Guess who?
Pedro Martínez: I misunderstood. I thought Bwild was responding to "Gerry".

Sorry!

6. Abril 2009, 14:01:06
joshi tm 
Dobbelschaken (AbigailII - joshi tm)

Should be an achievement I think ;) But it is not achieved at my Profile?

6. Abril 2009, 14:17:12
Fencer 
Asunto: Re:
joshi tm: Game achievements are not calculated from archive databases. I will activate it manually soon.

6. Abril 2009, 14:25:15
furbster 
Asunto: Am i supposed to have this one?
Lifetime dedication

Purchase a Black Brain Rook membership level.

6. Abril 2009, 14:41:30
Gammonator 
Asunto: Re: GUESS WHO?
Hrqls: I have read and read and read.....Still . no reply from the one who can do anything about it. The man who controls the money and the site. The man who can fix this stupid loop that has 1200 people stuck in a moving situation for the last year or so. I for one,,if it doesnt get resolved will not be back. Even Pat at IYT is not this careless with his site. And he is one dumb,,,never mind. I for one do not want to play with a player who offends the system and abuses it while the management and wonership of this site lets it happen. You have polling on this site, lets use it. Lets be democratic about it. All in favor of getting 35 more vacation days a year by buying another years membership and also the following year get another 35 for free say YES,, All others who believe that one should only get 35 days a year max no matter how many memberships he buys in a yearsay NAY. Its that simple. And if it gets voted down and the Nays win,,then vacation days should be revoked. Do even FOREVER Brain Rooks get unlimited vacations in a year???? I think not.

6. Abril 2009, 14:58:00
Fencer 
Asunto: Re: GUESS WHO?
Gammonator: It's not my fault that you don't read carefully: BrainKing.com (Fencer, 2009-04-03 14:08:06)

6. Abril 2009, 15:00:27
rod03801 
Asunto: Re: GUESS WHO?
Modificado por rod03801 (6. Abril 2009, 15:01:08)
Gammonator: Fencer DID say this, a little further down the board

BrainKing.com (Fencer, 2009-04-03 14:08:06)

Edit: Ooops, he beat me to it

6. Abril 2009, 15:01:50
Mort 
That he did Rod.

6. Abril 2009, 16:51:21
AbigailII 
Asunto: Unlikely archievements.
Modificado por AbigailII (7. Abril 2009, 07:40:50)

  1. Pass 25 turns in a row in backgammon instead of using autopass.
  2. Play at least 10 games of Cheversi, each lasting at least 10 moves.
  3. Have a simple feature request for at least years, but "more important things" need to be done first.
  4. Finish a game against a slow player in less than a year.
  5. Win at least 100 games against different opponents, each game lasting at least 500 moves.
  6. Take more than 3 months to answer interview questions.
  7. Win at least 50 games of Maharajah Chess against different opponents, as white.
  8. Score max possible points on all of Dice Poker, Triple Dice Poker, Dice Poker 6D and Triple Dice Poker 6D.
  9. Have at least 10 games running against different opponents, each lasting for at least a year, without taking any vacation time.
  10. Guess opponents Logic code on the first turn against at least 25 different opponents.
  11. Win at least 25 Dice 10x10 games against different opponents where the only pieces captured are the three Kings.
  12. Lose at least 25 Ludo games against different opponents, without rolling a single 6.
  13. Report 10 bugs whose status after 3 months is still "New".
  14. Appear on the "blocked users" list of at least 100 people.
  15. Make up a language. Pass it off as real. Translate BK to it.
  16. Kill the flying dragon.
  17. Win 25 games of Dark Battleboats against different opponents on your sixth turn.
  18. Accuse an innocent person of cheating and get him/her banned.
  19. Invent a game that sounds good, but turns out to be boring to play, and get Fencer to implement it.
  20. Get yourself banned from 25 boards or more.
  21. Refuse to resign a lost game. Ever.
  22. Have an active retirement in all the stairs, each lasting for at least a year.
    </ol>


[hrqls removed the name of a player]

6. Abril 2009, 16:56:06
Pedro Martínez 
Asunto: Re: Unlikely archievements.
AbigailII:

6. Abril 2009, 16:57:40
Fencer 
Asunto: Re: Unlikely archievements.
AbigailII: Some of these suggestions are really good.

6. Abril 2009, 17:23:54
coan.net 
Asunto: Re: Unlikely archievements.
AbigailII:

Score max possible points on all of Dice Poker, Triple Dice Poker, Dice Poker 6D and Triple Dice Poker 6D. ------ That would be hard, if not almost impossible. I would be surprised if anyone has gotten the "max" points. Maybe Fencer can look through the database to find out what the highest score in all those games are, then make an achievement between 50-100 points below that max as the achievement. (of course each game would be a little different.)

6. Abril 2009, 18:10:17
Undertaker. 
Asunto: Re: Unlikely archievements.
Fencer: And about blocked users? It would be interesting explorer that. Blocked users by 5 or 10 players, for example. lol. I think nobody knows the number of players that block us, so would be a surprise...Well, I don't know if this is a great archievement, but i would like to see it. :)

6. Abril 2009, 18:18:39
alanback 
Asunto: Re: Unlikely archievements.
coan.net:Methinks you overlooked the irony in the entire post ;-)

6. Abril 2009, 18:37:30
joshi tm 
Asunto: Re: Unlikely archievements.
Undertaker.: I think an Achievement should be something that you really WANT to do.

6. Abril 2009, 19:16:43
Undertaker. 
Asunto: Re: Unlikely archievements.
joshi tm: I understand your point, but that can be a dubious question. I don't want make "1000 moves in 1 day". However, you would want say that an archievement is a good thing (something like a guiness book lol) and my proposal is the contrary. :)

But if we're created achievements, so why not create bad achievements or something like that? Block users by 5 or 10 players; block users in 5 discussion boards; block users 5 times in the same discussion board; 10 consecutive lose games (with or without time-out); 5 or 10 consecutive lose games (with or without time-out) in same type of game.

So, is it a good idea?


6. Abril 2009, 19:19:36
Undertaker. 
Asunto: Re: Unlikely archievements.
Modificado por Undertaker. (6. Abril 2009, 19:20:59)
Undertaker.: Of course, it's a brilliant idea.

6. Abril 2009, 20:08:03
alanback 
Asunto: Re: Unlikely archievements.
Undertaker.:If I make 1,000 moves in 1 day, that means the rest of my day went very badly ;-)

6. Abril 2009, 20:08:51
Fencer 
Asunto: Re: Unlikely archievements.
alanback: And what about people who made 10 thousand moves in 1 day?

6. Abril 2009, 20:25:05
Mort 
Asunto: Re: Unlikely archievements.
Fencer: Very fast connection!!!!!!!

6. Abril 2009, 20:44:39
Fencer 
Asunto: Achievements
A new discussion board: http://brainking.com/cz/Board?bc=163

6. Abril 2009, 20:53:33
joshi tm 
Asunto: Re: Unlikely archievements.
Undertaker.: Short: No.

Longer: I refer to a P{laystion 3 Throphy where a player must do a friendly fire to achive an achievement, that's ridiculous!

6. Abril 2009, 21:05:38
alanback 
Asunto: Re: Unlikely archievements.
Fencer:For them, there is no rest of the day!

6. Abril 2009, 21:27:28
Undertaker. 
Asunto: Re: Unlikely archievements.
joshi tm: Sorry, but ridiculous was your understanding. The goal would be don't achieve an achievement, of course. Besides, my idea is very usual in others situations. In USA, you have Oscares for the best movie, for the best actor, for the best actress, etc., and in the day before, there's an event where is choosed the worst movie, actor, actress, producer, etc. Of course, nobody want be the worst actor and actress, right?

And about my idea, i can understand that block users by 5 or 10 players, block users in 5 discussion boards are bad ideas or dubious ideas, but 10 consecutive lose games (with or without time-out), 5 or 10
consecutive lose games (with or without time-out) in same type of game, etc. would be interesting...


6. Abril 2009, 21:29:44
joshi tm 
Asunto: Re: Unlikely archievements.
Undertaker.: A black achievement? Which costs points? Interesting though. Good point.

6. Abril 2009, 21:39:03
Undertaker. 
Asunto: Re: Unlikely archievements.
joshi tm: Yes, why not? If everybody want do achievements, nobody will want do black achievements, but sometimes we can do it against our intention, so why not create both?

6. Abril 2009, 22:03:42
alanback 
Asunto: Re: Unlikely archievements.
joshi tm:I think "negative achievements" is a better term.

7. Abril 2009, 00:24:53
Mort 
Asunto: Re: Ucore max possible points on all of Dice Poker, Triple Dice Poker, Dice Poker 6D and Triple Dice Poker 6D. ------ That would be hard, if not almost impossible.
coan.net: Aye.... For a perfect game, it would be a one in a well... big odds.

Near perfect points though.. rare, but not impossible.

7. Abril 2009, 10:35:43
Fencer 
Asunto: Vacation
The vacation system has been changed.
Details will be described in the BrainKing.info blog later today.
Objections are refused in advance.

7. Abril 2009, 11:44:18
Bernice 
Asunto: Re: Vacation
Fencer: ROFL......

7. Abril 2009, 12:15:04
Mort 
Asunto: Re: Vacation
Fencer: Found it already on the paid membership details for rooks....

1.2.2) Brain Rook

A player with Brain Rook membership level can use up to 35 vacation days a year. After some vacation days are used, it is possible (twice a year) to get some extra days (during the same year) if the membership is renewed by another year (or longer period) - 10 after the first renewal and 5 after the second one.

7. Abril 2009, 12:39:33
Undertaker. 
Asunto: Re: Vacation
(V): If i understood, a player can only have 50 (35+10+5) vacation days a year, right? So, how is possible a person have 70 (35+35) vacation days a year? It was a bug or i didn't understand anything... <img>

7. Abril 2009, 12:42:40
Mort 
Asunto: Re: Vacation
Undertaker.: That is a good question, I don't think it was a bug by Fencer's reply to the person complaining.

7. Abril 2009, 12:47:29
Hrqls 
Asunto: Re: Vacation
Undertaker.: in the new system you brain rooks can have a max of 35+10+5 vacation days per year

in the old system you could more than that .. each renewel would give a brain rook 35 extra days .. the 70 days you speak about are probably bought in the old system

give the new system some time to start :)

7. Abril 2009, 12:51:18
Undertaker. 
Asunto: Re: Vacation
Modificado por Undertaker. (7. Abril 2009, 12:56:47)
Hrqls: Yes, of course. I thought that system was already created some time ago. I didn't see Fencer post. lol.

7. Abril 2009, 14:17:55
Fencer 
Asunto: Re: Fencer
Snoopy: No, if someone gives me the list of them

7. Abril 2009, 15:09:36
AbigailII 
Asunto: Re: Fencer
Fencer: Well, there's the one who must not be named.

7. Abril 2009, 15:10:37
Undertaker. 
Asunto: Re: Fencer
AbigailII:

7. Abril 2009, 15:42:20
joshi tm 
This will definitely take abuse of the system down. If a game now last longer than a year, it is probably an Anti Backgamon game with loose time controls.

7. Abril 2009, 17:45:39
nodnarbo 
Asunto: game settings
So I was taking a look at the game settings page just now, and I'm wondering if anyone can tell me the difference between the first and third sets of Logik pieces.

7. Abril 2009, 17:48:04
Pedro Martínez 
Asunto: Re: game settings
nodnarbo: If you find a green piece in the third set, I'll tell you. :)

<< <   547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556   > >>
Fecha y hora
Amigos conectados
Foros favoritos
Comunidades
Consejo del día
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, todos los derechos reservados.
Volver a arriba