Nombre de Usuario: Contraseña:
Registro de un Nuevo Usuario
Moderador: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Mensajes por página:
Lista de boletines
No tienes autorización para escribir mensajes en este boletín. Para escribir mensajes en este boletín se require un nivel mínimo de membresía de Brain Caballo.
Modo: Todo el mundo puede escribir
Buscar entre los mensajes:  

<< <   594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603   > >>
4. Abril 2004, 19:28:57
Fencer 
The rules were not changed, only completed.

4. Abril 2004, 18:53:33
WhisperzQ 
Asunto: Re tablut game 178202
I believe that the game should (have been) be a draw, not a win for black. One task that black must take on in this situation, where they are in such control, is to manage the situation so that they do win. If they cannot do this they do not deserve to win and playing for the draw (successfully so in this situation) should be an option for white. The rules should definitely NOT be changed mid (or post) game.

I have just checked the rules and see that there is now a 3rd win condition that I do not remember before which references the "no valid move" situation. I expect this has just been added. This scenario was previuosly discussed in the Tablut DB without any change being considered appropriate then so I don't see why one is pertinent now. I do not agree with the rule change and believe that the game (would be) is devalued with this change ... just my opinion though.

*Edit* I have just done a search of other internet sites with Tablut and other similar variants. While some rules are slightly different (number of pieces, size of board, need for King to reach the corner, capturing against the King as well as pawns) none mention a rule whereby a win is awarded against a player not able to make a valid move ... I STRONGLY believe the rule change must go.

4. Abril 2004, 10:39:03
harley 
rod, put him on your enemies list, then he can't send you any messages :o)

4. Abril 2004, 08:28:26
rod03801 
in backgammon too, Fencer?

now I'll wait for Dano's alter ego to invade my message box with rude remarks.. He always does when this subject comes up

lol.. solve THAT in bk 2.0!!!

:-D

4. Abril 2004, 08:25:02
Kevin 
rofl Fencer... i'll have to stop making those illegal moves now! ;-)

4. Abril 2004, 08:17:19
Lythande 
Thank you. :)

4. Abril 2004, 08:04:10
ughaibu 
Thanks.

4. Abril 2004, 08:00:31
Fencer 
It was a joke. Illegal moves should not be possible to do [except some special cases, fixed in BK 2.0].

4. Abril 2004, 07:56:40
ughaibu 
Asunto: Fencer
Could you explain your reply to Backoff please.

4. Abril 2004, 07:53:58
Fencer 
Lythande: Done.
Backoff: Who makes an illegal move, loses the game and also one or two othes ones, randomly picked :-D

4. Abril 2004, 07:47:39
Backoff 
how about an illegal move??? :)

4. Abril 2004, 07:42:17
Lythande 
Thanks, Fencer. :)

..erm.. but can you fix the game in question, or does she need to resign?

4. Abril 2004, 07:40:10
Fencer 
Okay, let's add a rule of player losing a game when he cannot make a legal move. Black wins in this case.

4. Abril 2004, 06:37:49
ughaibu 
White needs to resign.

4. Abril 2004, 04:48:48
Backoff 
sorry, fixed

I've been searching all over the place and no1 seems to agree on the rules. So I would say that they need to be set in stone for this site. just my $.02

4. Abril 2004, 04:42:23
coan.net 
bumble's link does not include the www in the front of Brainking, so your cookies don't sign you on to the correct page, taking you to the log-in page.

< A HREF="/game/ShowGame?g=178202&i=13" > - best way to write it so it works for everyone (LINK)

4. Abril 2004, 04:39:39
Lythande 
Oh.. and Bumble? That link takes me to the login page for some odd reason... And as to 'where has Lythande gotten off to' .. I'm off reading/playing/etc in this and other tabs. ;)

4. Abril 2004, 04:37:06
Lythande 
Ah.. So perhaps it should be a stalemate?

4. Abril 2004, 04:35:13
Backoff 
just pointing out that the full rules need to be written lol. Ok in the current position, the king can't move, should this be a black win? Hummm, where's the rules when you need them lol
BTW white missed an easy win on 10 lol.

4. Abril 2004, 04:34:25
coan.net 
Talbut Board - Good place to read and talk more about the rules of the game.

Fencer's post on April 14, 2003 - about a similar situation as mentioned below - "Should be considered as a draw but this site does not support a perpetual check detection yet."

4. Abril 2004, 04:31:10
coan.net 
But the Mercenaries did not surround the king - the king "jumped" into the middle of their group.

Just like a pawn can jump in between 2 other color pawns and not be removed. (Yes, many of the rules on this site does not explain all the details - I'm sure Fencer will take help with any additional rule writing for any games) (speaking of that, Battleboats does not even have rules yet.) :-)

4. Abril 2004, 04:28:21
Backoff 
From the rules page:
Mercenaries surround the king from all four sides and capture him. The second possibility is that mercenaries surround the king from three sides and the throne stands on the fourth side (since nobody, including the king, cannot move to the throne). The black player wins the game.

If the king moving into that dosn't mean a black win, then the rules need to reflect that because as the rules are written now, black should have won.

4. Abril 2004, 04:25:52
coan.net 
Ok - Figured out the problem (After reading the Talbut message board)

Black did not surrond the white king - The white king MOVED INTO the space surroned by white pawns - which is not a lose.

Now where Lythande's game is now, White can not move at all - so I would guess what needs to happen in those cases is that it is a lose for White - maybe something Fencer will have to program sometime.

4. Abril 2004, 04:19:31
Backoff 
that's move 7 for white.

4. Abril 2004, 04:19:05
Backoff 
this should have been game.

4. Abril 2004, 04:17:48
Lythande 
"two moves ago" ..erm.. I meant the move before last. According to the rules, black only has to surround the white king on three sides, if the throne is on the fourth. This was done -before- I captured her last pawn, moving my soldier onto the fourth side with the throne between.

4. Abril 2004, 04:15:18
coan.net 
I'm no Talbut expert, but "2 moves ago" was not a win before the king was not surronded by black completly.

And like bumble said, it looks like it should be a win now - Fencer should be able to fix it once he come on-line.

UPDATED POST: Would move 7 be a win for black? The kind is surroned by 3 spots - the forth (Other side of start) is it's own white pawn, so I would not think that would count..... But again, I don't play talbut very much

4. Abril 2004, 04:13:58
Backoff 
Move 7 should have been game over, black wins.

4. Abril 2004, 04:05:02
bumble 
Yeah, I've just looked. Black definitely wins.

4. Abril 2004, 04:03:14
bumble 
No you're not missing anything, Lythande. It's happened to me before now. It's a bug and would probably be best if white resigned.

4. Abril 2004, 03:56:00
Lythande 
<Since Fencer isn't currently on (I've already sent him a personal message), could one of you Talbut experts please check Game ID: 178202 for me? I think it should have been a win two moves ago. Now white's king is surrounded, but the game is threatening to time out. My opponent offered a draw, but only because it was the only link she could find. ;>

Tell me if I'm missing something.

3. Abril 2004, 18:07:13
Kevin 
Thanks everyone... :-)

3. Abril 2004, 11:09:24
harley 
And don't forget to send me questions for Kevins interview!!

3. Abril 2004, 07:57:02
Artful Dodger 
Asunto: Great Job Kevin
well done

3. Abril 2004, 07:48:24
Backoff 
Kevin I think that's great what your doing!!! Keep up the good work.

3. Abril 2004, 07:47:39
Linda J 
Asunto: Re: Membership Competition
WOW!!! Good job Kevin

3. Abril 2004, 07:38:30
TexasToest 
SOD, the hyperlinks turn a different color to indicate that you've been there done that. When the target changes in any way, it turns back to the color of an unseen page.

3. Abril 2004, 07:18:11
StarOfDarkness 
Asunto: Tournament highlighting....
is a help for any prize tournaments listed. Having those turnaments also listed in capital letters or bold print would also set them off without changing the tournament listings as they now are. The reason I say this is because as soon as I check out a tournament, the blue turns to pink or red, depending on how some people see their screen for the next 24 hours......I think bold Capital print needs to be added to offset this minor flaw.

3. Abril 2004, 05:45:18
Kevin 
Asunto: Membership Competition
I have sent the payment to Fencer for the winners yesterday (April 1st), but i will wait for it to go through to Fencer before i announce the winners... All i'll say is there was four one-year-rook memberships awarded out of eight entries (or i guess you could say 5 counting me - i won my competition with 763,706,971,412 words of length 56 - lol)

:-)

2. Abril 2004, 14:53:37
bwildman 
Asunto: Re: One thing is for sure SOD
yet

2. Abril 2004, 12:04:33
StarOfDarkness 
Asunto: Re: One thing is for sure SOD
AD....you hit the nail on the head!!!..lol

2. Abril 2004, 07:24:21
DeaD man WalkiN 
Asunto: :o{(```
back to my corner poof

2. Abril 2004, 01:51:41
Artful Dodger 
Asunto: One thing is for sure SOD
There is no site out there that can even come close to BK in it's overall offerings. There are so many positive things here it's hard to know where to start. I think one reason BK is so good is that there was a lot of user imput. Two heads are better than one. And Fencer put those ideas into reality.

2. Abril 2004, 01:49:40
StarOfDarkness 
Asunto: IT AIN'T EASY ALL THE TIME....
A mind that works wonders has to take a day off at times....not that the mind stops working ~ sometimes you have to get in touch as to what you have visioned, what you have created and where you want to fly....may I suggest Merlot??!!??

2. Abril 2004, 01:34:36
StarOfDarkness 
Asunto: Re: This is Fencer.....
Ahhh geezes, I'm on a fat free diet..LOL

2. Abril 2004, 01:31:08
Brian1971 
Asunto: Re: This is Fencer.....
Star is looking for payment for buttering up to Fencer. Sorry it doesnt work that way. lol.

2. Abril 2004, 01:21:04
StarOfDarkness 
Asunto: This is Fencer.....
<What a mind you have to have given birth to "BRAINKING". I personally know that wen a brainstorm takes off, sometimes we leave a wake ( guggles from a ship>..lol). You have done a WONDERFUL job with this site and I was one who fell upon ths site through hear-say. I stuck with you, although there were many times I couldn't access this site for days on end. I finally figured out if I became a member, that may help only my accesss but your site problems.....I hope more and mor users decide to make the trip.....you won't be sorry folk...PLEASE PART WITH A BUCK and buy into a 6 or one year membership.You will get the THE MOST bang for your bucks in record time!!!! This site gas grown into the best site ever.....FENCER, your "Brainking is becoming the BEST SITE on the web and I speak as a Webtv plus user. I wish you all the future luck in the world!!! LOL.....now pass me some good backgammon dice to play, ok?....my ratings are slipping!!..LOL

1. Abril 2004, 20:57:57
Rogue Lion 
thanks harley and BBW

1. Abril 2004, 20:12:31
harley 
I believe they are, Rogue Lion.

1. Abril 2004, 19:58:31
Rogue Lion 
BBW: your second answer fits better as any player with correct bkr etc... is welcome. Just strange that the continue button is in the area that says no requirements, and, as I said, there is no way to tell if the requirements that were designated were retained.
In short, I take your answer to mean the requirements are retained even though I continue from the non-specific area.

<< <   594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603   > >>
Fecha y hora
Amigos conectados
Foros favoritos
Comunidades
Consejo del día
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, todos los derechos reservados.
Volver a arriba