Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
Lista de boletines
No tienes autorización para escribir mensajes en este boletín. Para escribir mensajes en este boletín se require un nivel mínimo de membresía de Brain Peón.
Only on a politics board can a thread start about 911, morph into a discussion on smoking, and then change once again into comments about abortion, back to smoking, and end with my dumb comment here.
Bwild: Clinton blundered and the US is mistaken to let aliens into our country unabated. The system allows for aliens to attend our colleges and train in our other institutions. We believe in "freedom" but officials seem to have forgotten the lesson of the Trojan horse. Not only do we let the horse in, we built it in the first place. Time to burn that thing to the ground.
England has a huge Muslim problem. America will too if it doesn't wise up. Some people want to enter our country not for the freedoms we offer, but they mean to do us harm.
Czuch: They just find another site that "refutes" the findings. How many men were involved in Watergate? Just a few. And they couldn't keep their mouths shut as they ratted each other out. So now we are to believe that a major conspiracy involving perhaps hundreds of participants has succeeded in doing the impossible. When something happens in my classroom and I want to know who did it, I know that everyone will rat out the offender. And once the offender is ratted out, he will tell all he knows about others. He's not going down alone. That scenerio is far more believable than a host of offenders keeping themselves collectively quiet about their crimes.
Jim Dandy: It's not garbage to criticize it. Obama and his crew are trying to ram this bill down out throats when clearly it's a huge mess. It's not just Republicans that are calling attention to the problem, economists are too. Why spend all that money without careful analysis of the ramifications of each measure?
Jim Dandy:Not judging his "record" but judging his most recent actions and decisions. Not a good start. He's shown great skill at campaigning, not so much as a leader, so far.
His recent comments aimed at Republicans who had criticized the "stimulus" package as nothing more than a "spending" package displayed a side of Obama people haven't seen much of. He showed a lack of leadership and demonstrated he is not above using mockery and sarcasm to blast his opponents. Yeah, that will win them over.
The problem is, thinking people understand that what the Republicans were pointing out by calling it a "spending" package, is that the so-called "stimulus" package will not do the very thing it is supposed to do. As Bwild has pointed out, it's a pig with lipstick. All the "spending" attached to the stimulus bill is just a repeat of old failed economic policies the democrats are famous for. Pet projects and paybacks to political supporters are NOT going to create the kind of jobs that benefit the man on the street. Most Americans view Obama's plan with doubt and most also agree that the democrats crafted it with unnecessary "spending." The republicans are just trying to draw attention to the fact that spending money for the sake of spending isn't the answer the American people are hoping for. Anyone can "spend" but it takes real leadership to spend it in the right way. Obama has failed in a big way here. This stupid idea (crafted by the dems) will not only fail, but it will put the US economy in a worse state. But hey, Obama can always blame Bush once again.
Bernice:It is very scary times. The far left democrats are very dangerous people. They will change America if they can and destroy the Constitution. And the people will be like lemmings and follow follow follow. Obama's popularity will take a nose dive before his term is into it's 2nd year.
Czuch: Yep, she's using those kids to get rich. She probably knew that she'd make a ton of money doing this. But she put 8 lives at risk. It could have been a far different outcome. They could all be dead or retarded or handicapped in another way. She already had 6 kids. What did she need with 8 more? She's irresponsible to the max.
I did read somewhere that scientists have found a way to fertilize an egg using a woman's DNA (something like that) but it's not a perfected process. They are able to make a "sperm" with another woman's DNA.
Ok, fine. So two lesbians could theoretically have kids this way. Then it would be true that a woman doesn't need a man (except it's men who discovered this process).
And we've already had a pregnant man (sort of) so I guess men don't need women either.
It's a scary world out there! Science is changing everything. And the potential for abuse is staggering.
Snoopy: What she did was irresponsible. She can't afford those kids. Now she has 14. Lives with her parents in a three bedroom. And it's all because she doesn't want to be lonely. She could have gotten a puppy. One person can't possibly take care of all those kids. So the US taxpayers will have to foot the bill.
AFAIK, Britain has a law that you can only implant 2 embryos. The clinic that implanted 8 was irresponsible too. It's not enough to "love" children to raise them properly. They don't stay young and cute. I hope things work out but I feel sad for the kids. If things go bad, they will be the ones to suffer.
Asunto: Re: Pelosi's idea of what should be included in the stimulus package:
Bwild: And Nancy Pelosi stands before the press and says that Americans are losing 500 million jobs a month. Um, there aren't that many people living in the US. Let's see, there are 305,758,372. Kinda like democrats that vote. More vote than are registered. More are registered than the entire population of any given State. So at least her math is consistent!
Czuch: I spend my money when I want to. I just bought my wife a new computer (lap top) and we just purchased round trip flights to Arizona. Car rental too. So that will put some bucks back into the economy. So I've more than spent that money but on my terms and not on the governments. I never buy something just cuz I have the money (the government could learn from that). You should see the truck I drive. I could buy a new one outright but why? Better off in the bank. I say good for me and bernice! ;)
anastasia: that pretty much sums up this stimulus package. It's our money and congress is wasting it. Most news (if not all) agencies agree. It needs serious trimming.
Asunto: Pelosi's idea of what should be included in the stimulus package:
• $2 billion earmark to re-start FutureGen, a near-zero emissions coal power plant in Illinois that the Department of Energy defunded last year because it said the project was inefficient. • A $246 million tax break for Hollywood movie producers to buy motion picture film. • $650 million for the digital television converter box coupon program. • $88 million for the Coast Guard to design a new polar icebreaker (arctic ship). • $448 million for constructing the Department of Homeland Security headquarters. • $248 million for furniture at the new Homeland Security headquarters. • $600 million to buy hybrid vehicles for federal employees. • $400 million for the Centers for Disease Control to screen and prevent STD's. • $1.4 billion for rural waste disposal programs. • $125 million for the Washington sewer system. • $150 million for Smithsonian museum facilities. • $1 billion for the 2010 Census, which has a projected cost overrun of $3 billion. • $75 million for "smoking cessation activities." • $200 million for public computer centers at community colleges. • $75 million for salaries of employees at the FBI. • $25 million for tribal alcohol and substance abuse reduction. • $500 million for flood reduction projects on the Mississippi River. • $10 million to inspect canals in urban areas. • $6 billion to turn federal buildings into "green" buildings. • $500 million for state and local fire stations. • $650 million for wildland fire management on forest service lands. • $1.2 billion for "youth activities," including youth summer job programs. • $88 million for renovating the headquarters of the Public Health Service. • $412 million for CDC buildings and property. • $500 million for building and repairing National Institutes of Health facilities in Bethesda, Maryland. • $160 million for "paid volunteers" at the Corporation for National and Community Service. • $5.5 million for "energy efficiency initiatives" at the Department of Veterans Affairs National Cemetery Administration. • $850 million for Amtrak. • $100 million for reducing the hazard of lead-based paint. • $75 million to construct a "security training" facility for State Department Security officers when they can be trained at existing facilities of other agencies. • $110 million to the Farm Service Agency to upgrade computer systems. • $200 million in funding for the lease of alternative energy vehicles for use on military installations.
Bernice:That is so crazy. Whey did they do that? The US did something similar. We got 1200 dollars from the knucklehead government. They wanted to stimulate the economy. I put it in the bank for a rainy day.
Asunto: Re: Coulter was on a local radio talk show this past morning
Jim Dandy:I doubt that. But she did sound like she had written her response.
I can tell you from experience that what that caller said is so very true. I've seen dozens of examples of that sort of thing. Kid has a kid, is irresponsible, and grandparents raise the child. Meanwhile, the "mother" gets all kinds of government assistance. My brother is one of those grandparents. He's been raising two of his grandkids (and he's a step dad). Coulter is spot on with regard to single parents (statistically speaking). There's always exceptions but exceptions don't make the rule. Society would do well to pay attention to the research she cites.
Asunto: Re: Coulter was on a local radio talk show this past morning
Jim Dandy: I listened to the entire interview. She's great and her thesis is right on. And she was very civil too. The caller had a great line about a boil.....
DEMOCRATS BY THE NUMBER New Townhall.com blogger Dwayne Horner recently compiled a stunning list of the tax transgressions by those writing, creating and implementing the nation's tax policy. And so much more here.
$34,000: the amount of federal taxes that Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner (D) failed to pay during his employment at the International Monetary Fund despite receiving extra compensation and explanatory brochures that described his tax liabilities.
$75,000: the amount of money that the head of the powerful tax-writing committee, Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-NY), was forced to report on his taxes after the discovery that he had not reported income from a Costa Rican rental property. His excuses for the failure started with blaming his wife, then his accountant and finally the fact that he didn't speak Spanish.
$140,000: the amount of back taxes and interest that Cabinet nominee Tom Daschle (D) was forced to cough up after the vetting process revealed significant, unexplained tax liabilities.
$800,000: the amount of "sweetheart" mortgages Senate Banking Chairman Chris Dodd (D-CT) received from Countrywide Financial, the details for which he has refused to release details despite months of promises to do so.