BrainKing - Foros de discusión (Feature requests)

Asunto: Re: Checker markers.

I have played more checker games on this site than anyone else I even played Fencer and resigned to let him win but I do not see any movement in having proper checker markers adopted what is the problem its your turn has over 2.000.000 members it does not appear to be a problem there so whats trhe matter here???????

15. Julio 2004, 19:44:59

cool :o)

15. Julio 2004, 19:41:28

It can be done.

15. Julio 2004, 19:35:21

Asunto: stats

How about "avaerage established rank position"

I mean position rather than bkr
?

15. Julio 2004, 12:55:40

MadMonkey/Fencer - A feature like that would be GREAT for the "Fast Start" tournaments I have. (which I try to limit myself to 5 at a time) :-)

15. Julio 2004, 12:48:19

Yes, it would be possible.

15. Julio 2004, 12:23:11

MadMonkey

Fencer: At present tournaments start when the day/time is reached.
Would it be possible to have them also start is the Max. number of players was reached ?

15. Julio 2004, 10:43:14

Awwww, soomberdy kernt tache der tooth

:·)~

15. Julio 2004, 10:04:21

Modificado por bumble (15. Julio 2004, 10:09:04)

Shadowy Figure: Is that a feature request?

On second thoughts, I've deleted your post.

15. Julio 2004, 08:15:20

Walter Montego

Asunto: Re: I must say shadow ... 0:)

Or as they say,

Figures don't lie, but liars figure.

15. Julio 2004, 05:25:22

Brian1971

Hey Stevie at least you can be proven innocent so Fencer cant ban you. So now I say who is corrupt enough to conspire to fix ratings?? I still need a name. LOL

15. Julio 2004, 05:17:26

nasty LMAO

15. Julio 2004, 05:10:35

Brian1971

Asunto: Re:

Based on your ratings Stevie,it wasnt you involved. LOL. j/k.

15. Julio 2004, 05:00:46

LMAO you had me going for a moment then :oS

15. Julio 2004, 04:58:56

Brian1971

Asunto: I am outraged Stevie...

and not because you just beat me in dark battleboats. I am outraged that you would suggest that Princess kammy would donate bkr to another player. Those 1057 losses were hard fought losses and you know it. Who and I ask who could she be conspiring to help boost their bkr? All I want to know is who is behind that kind of corruption!!!! LOL

15. Julio 2004, 02:05:24

Asunto: Re: I must say shadow ... 0:)

hoy hoy hoy, dano z:)

15. Julio 2004, 01:34:28

Czuch

Asunto: Re: opponets lists in backgammon

That is already possible... Simply go to the head of your games waiting to play, and click on the game time remaining column. It should orgainize all your games by the time remaining before a time out. If the order is from longest to shortest, just click the link again and it will switch to the shortest firsat.

If you want just your backgammon games, you gan play and go to more games of this type, which will take you to the next backgammon game that is closest to timing out :)

15. Julio 2004, 01:27:46

california man

Asunto: opponets lists in backgammon

..I would like to opponets names listed by 'time left to make a move,the sortest time left to be at the top of the list,rather in the middle or at the bottom'

15. Julio 2004, 00:17:21

danoschek

Asunto: I must say shadow ... 0:)

that 62% of all statisticians feel 76% confident about 83% of their statistics. ~*~

14. Julio 2004, 21:52:00

Seriously tho, stats are for the boids :D (My opinions, I make 'em up.)

~ SF

14. Julio 2004, 21:50:19

I know it's discrimination, but I say we MOON (_|_) the Paying Members!!!

*evil laugh*

14. Julio 2004, 16:29:43

Why, Mr. Anderson?

14. Julio 2004, 16:21:04

I hope someone dont show up with that nic now LOL

14. Julio 2004, 16:20:00

ID - Steve and bumble. Stumble!

14. Julio 2004, 16:18:56

You sure we are not the same person now?

14. Julio 2004, 16:18:12

Worrying isn't it? rofl!

14. Julio 2004, 16:17:09

This is getting too much of a habbit Bumble LMAO

14. Julio 2004, 16:14:47

Heck, discriminate away, Steve! I agree with you.

14. Julio 2004, 16:10:56

I know its discrimination, but cant the statistics be for just paying members?

14. Julio 2004, 16:03:48

maybe the 150 wins were to get bkr and the 1057 losses was to donate the bkr to another player ;oÞ

14. Julio 2004, 16:01:23

Czuch

Asunto: Re: Statistics page

It might be cool, but I am not sure if it actually tells us anything about the quality of the players.

For example, I looked at Princess Kammy (since she was nuber 50 on the list) She has a total of 150 win, and 1057 losses.

What am I missing here?

14. Julio 2004, 15:09:06

Caissus

Asunto: Re: Statistics page

Great !,really!

14. Julio 2004, 15:07:55

Asunto: Statistics page

Cool

14. Julio 2004, 14:58:04

The Statistics page is here.

14. Julio 2004, 03:56:25

ughaibu

How about an average of one's best five ratings?

13. Julio 2004, 22:58:43

Jason

1.so if someone only played pente games for example , even if they was number one on two or three of the boards and played nothing else would they not make the top 30 list ?
2. if someone had a rating for every type of game played here (even if most was poor) would they make the top on your list ?

13. Julio 2004, 21:39:35

BBW: Such tables can be generated in real-time, one table is returned in half a second. BK 2.0's database model is prepared for it :-)

13. Julio 2004, 21:36:04

See Fencer - these are some "cool" stats - You should write something which will run stuff like this once a month, and then make a special "Stats" page to show all this kind of stuff!

Hey cool - I'm 5th

13. Julio 2004, 21:31:53

grenv

<And second by >100 points!!

Congrats arpa. I'll have to challenge you to a few games now. ;)

13. Julio 2004, 21:31:03

grenv

LOL.

or select avg(a.rating) as average_bkr...

otherwise the code might become difficult to maintain.

:)

13. Julio 2004, 21:31:03

Of course, grenv is the second :-)

13. Julio 2004, 21:30:19

Asunto: Table of average BKRs (established), 11 or more game types

average_bkr	game_count	user_name
2063.0714	14	arpa
1953.7273	11	grenv
1928.7692	13	Pedro Martinez
1874.4375	16	Jason
1820.1818	11	BIG BAD WOLF
1802.0000	13	pawnme
1796.1154	26	Fencer
1774.0909	11	Brian1971
1773.4167	12	clean4today
1752.3636	11	Czechgirl
1733.6800	25	Hannelore
1715.5000	22	tonyh
1705.1333	15	kitti
1699.1538	13	grillyx
1696.5455	11	Uil
1695.5455	11	ellieoop
1690.8125	16	Watson
1671.0000	15	shaggath
1662.6923	13	Kevin
1621.4167	12	faith
1619.0000	14	goodfoods
1615.9200	25	Stevie
1596.7500	16	lovelysharon
1593.6471	17	MadMonkey
1590.9444	18	Paula29
1588.1875	16	Angus
1587.1429	14	drgnrdr
1566.1429	14	Stinger
1561.3793	29	zetes
1559.2500	12	Krecik

13. Julio 2004, 21:24:28

select avg(a.rating) as total_bkr, count(a.rating) as game_count, b.user_name from game_stats as a, player as b where a.id = b.id and a.game_counted >= 25 group by a.id having count(a.rating) >= 11 order by total_bkr desc

13. Julio 2004, 21:20:28

grenv

This is merely a list of people who play virtually every game. I suppose amongst such players the list is valid.

I think average is better, perhaps with a minimum of 11!

I choose that since I am rated in 11 game types :)

13. Julio 2004, 20:56:02

Caissus

Asunto: Re: Fencer

Like the film "Highlander":There is only one ! :-)

13. Julio 2004, 20:43:01

established.... that is my next goal. I currently have ratings for every game (or will as soon as a few current games are completed) - next goal is to play at least 25 of each game! (ugh - I need more time.)

13. Julio 2004, 20:40:50

So am I the "Brain King"? Ha ha! :-)

13. Julio 2004, 20:39:03

Mely

Asunto: Re: Table of total BKRs (established)

thanks :-)

13. Julio 2004, 20:38:35

But I would have to create a new page for such tables.

13. Julio 2004, 20:35:12