 |
|
 Run around the PondDiscuss about this new multiplayer game or comment current runs. (includes all versions of the game) Game link..... Ponds Ratings link..... Regular Pond Ratings -and- Dark Pond Ratings -and- Run in the Rain Ratings Winners link..... All Winners - (Regular Ponds Only) - (Dark Ponds Only) - (Run in the Rain Only) No tienes autorización para escribir mensajes en este boletín. Para escribir mensajes en este boletín se require un nivel mínimo de membresía de Brain Peón. Modo: Todo el mundo puede escribir
<< < 1 2 3 > >> 15. Octubre 2018, 08:12:25 Asunto: Re: pond's trouble  TAROU: is it better now? 17. Enero 2008, 07:22:32 Asunto: Re: world record? rabbitoid: It might be worth a new tab at the Statistics page.  17. Enero 2008, 07:14:18 Asunto: Re: world record? 25. Octubre 2007, 19:53:25 Asunto: Re: joshi tm: Nobody can do that. 11. Octubre 2007, 21:46:10 Asunto: Re: Reversal of removal of a player from a pond? rod03801:  Only me.1. Febrero 2007, 08:36:37 Asunto: Re: BerniceC: That's easy because Evásek announced that she is leaving BK, so he could deduct she won't play ponds anymore. 4. Julio 2005, 21:12:52 Asunto: Re: NOT at all Walter Montego: Every game is "flawed" in some way. You cannot find a perfect one. Btw, I don't think there is a significant flaw. Every aspect can be considered as a part of the strategy. 1. Julio 2005, 07:03:06 Asunto: Re: Pedro Martínez: Not legalized. But you cannot banish people only because it "looks like" cheating. 25. Junio 2005, 23:08:16 Asunto: Re: what if.... Nothingness: You must finish it with default moves. 13. Junio 2005, 13:42:38 Asunto: Re: Eriisa: Of course it didn't, it needs 16 players. 13. Junio 2005, 13:15:38 Asunto: Re: this rain is weird Mike UK: Absolutely. 13. Junio 2005, 12:43:03 Asunto: Re: this rain is weird rabbitoid: More than 2 players can fall in a round.  13. Junio 2005, 12:22:55 Asunto: Re: 22. Mayo 2005, 15:49:26 Asunto: Re: This is weird Pedro Martínez: Can you give me the pond ID? 17. Mayo 2005, 07:26:15 Asunto: Re: question Nothingness: Sorry! My bad. Ponds are counted, of course. 10. Mayo 2005, 12:55:53 Asunto: Re: Dark Ponds Mike UK: Only names and BKRs of running players are hidden. Points left and bids are visible, so are all information about fallen players. 9. Mayo 2005, 15:18:01 Asunto: Re: rod03801: Add a wolf smiley after every comment and nobody can recognize you.   9. Mayo 2005, 15:15:08 I call you a pesimist. The names of fallen players show up.9. Mayo 2005, 15:06:17 Asunto: Re: Dark rod03801: The names will be replaced by question marks even in the discussion. 2. Mayo 2005, 21:20:01 Asunto: Re: Pond 352 tonyh: I see nothing "whacky". What do you mean? 2. Mayo 2005, 09:03:55 Asunto: Re: Re: Hrqls: It's calculated only when the pond is finished :-)
Statistics - not yet. 2. Mayo 2005, 08:55:28 Asunto: Re: Re: Hrqls: You cannot count it as "win" or "loss". The formula has some input parameters - your current BKR, average BKR of all opponents, current BKR of each opponent, number of "wins" [players with lower final order], number of "draws" [players on the same level as you], number of "losses" [players with higher final order]. It takes all of this, makes some creepy things with them and spits out the result as your new BKR :-) 1. Mayo 2005, 19:13:42 Asunto: Re: rod03801: This one. Yes, the same is applied on normal games but in a simplified way. 1. Mayo 2005, 17:54:59 Asunto: Re: Re: Cathy1: 16 players might be a little better because what really matters is the average BKR of all your opponents. But not only this, of course. 1. Mayo 2005, 17:47:02 Asunto: Re: BIG BAD WOLF: You are guessing right. 1. Mayo 2005, 17:24:08 Asunto: Re: Re: Czuch Chuckers: Not always, it depends on your opponents' BKR. Falling in the pond with low rated players is worse. 1. Mayo 2005, 17:17:29 Not exactly. The formula is more complex in this case but the basic idea is the same. 1. Mayo 2005, 08:03:05 Well, the ratings are based on final positions of the particular pond players. When you have the last round of a finished pond, consider players behind you as your wins, players on the same position as draws and the rest as your losses. And, of course, their current BKR is significant for the BKR result. 21. Abril 2005, 18:13:20 Asunto: Re: Re: BIG BAD WOLF: Is it better now? 27. Marzo 2005, 18:15:36 Asunto: Re: Fencer Czuch Chuckers: 6 players, not 3. Carry on. 27. Marzo 2005, 17:14:34 Asunto: Re: BKR Mely: Nothing, as you can see. 27. Marzo 2005, 17:04:56 Asunto: Re: Fencer Czuch Chuckers: Yes if you give me pond ID and player ID. 16. Marzo 2005, 16:27:26 And the result is?
Complaining is useless. New server is needed. 15. Marzo 2005, 20:45:20 Asunto: Re: question rabbitoid: Because the server was down for two hours, maybe more. 19. Febrero 2005, 12:38:38 Asunto: Re: Fencer redsales: It's worth thinking about.  6. Febrero 2005, 23:30:03 What's the point of this endless discussion? I already have a rating system for pond games, it's just not activated yet. The goal is to keep the things easy and simple, which is the fact certain people still refuse to accept. 2. Febrero 2005, 15:32:08 Yes, Londo came with this proposal, I am aware of it. However, the only list of forbidden things can be found on the User Agreement page. 2. Febrero 2005, 15:09:31 Asunto: Re: Pedro Martínez: Not forbidden, only non-recommended. But there are situations which don't allow to leave some posts on boards, even if somebody already responded to them. << < 1 2 3 > >> |
Fecha y hora
Amigos conectados
Foros favoritos
Comunidades
Consejo del día
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, todos los derechos reservados. Volver a arriba |