 |
|
 Run around the PondDiscuss about this new multiplayer game or comment current runs. (includes all versions of the game) Game link..... Ponds Ratings link..... Regular Pond Ratings -and- Dark Pond Ratings -and- Run in the Rain Ratings Winners link..... All Winners - (Regular Ponds Only) - (Dark Ponds Only) - (Run in the Rain Only) No tienes autorización para escribir mensajes en este boletín. Para escribir mensajes en este boletín se require un nivel mínimo de membresía de Brain Peón. Modo: Todo el mundo puede escribir
<< < 1 2 3 > >> 2. Febrero 2005, 08:35:32 Asunto: Re:  BerniceC: I am afraid Sinay doesn't read this board, you should PM her instead :-) 31. Enero 2005, 08:16:49 Asunto: Re: Hmmm BerniceC: Is it really so difficult to understand that I could have more important things to do than to make a move in a pond? 31. Enero 2005, 08:02:15 Asunto: Re: Hmmm BerniceC: You should read the rules first, before complaining. 25. Enero 2005, 19:11:37 Hey, this is a pond which was finished before the fix was applied. Such ponds must be fixed manually in the database, of course. 24. Enero 2005, 19:52:29 Asunto: Re: Ponds ranking Mely: The formula has been fixed a while ago. 23. Enero 2005, 19:08:47 Asunto: Re: Bry: The basic idea is to take a pond as a tournament. Your final position is used to determine your "wins" and "loses", compared to final positions of other players. 23. Enero 2005, 17:33:40 The rating system for the pond games is still in a test mode. I'll try to do some experiments next week.
Anyway, no results will be lost and everything will be calculated from the very beginning. 23. Enero 2005, 13:55:15 Asunto: Re: pond for dummies EdTrice: Just to be exact, you are not a paying member, you won the membership in my prize tournament. 22. Enero 2005, 20:26:42 Asunto: Re: Knights who fall to pawns Thad: 1) No. 2) No. 22. Enero 2005, 17:32:28 Asunto: Re: Re: EdTrice: Because you cannot eliminate the human factor. Why don't you play one or two ponds to prove your theory? 21. Enero 2005, 19:40:06 No private conversation is expected in the pond game messages. So it's perfectly okay to make it visible for everyone. 12. Enero 2005, 09:09:26 Asunto: Rules I like BBW's (Bry's) proposal:
Starting point Value: Choose between 1,000 - 20,000 (Maybe choices like 1,000, 2,500, 5,000, 7,500, 10,000, 12,500, 15,000, 17,500, 20,000) Bonus Points: Choice between 0 = 500 (maybe choices like 0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500) So the most "unbalanced" game would be start with 1,000 points, and can get up to 500 bonus points - which is how many games will be towards the end of the game anyway! There is no need to make it more complicated. 11. Enero 2005, 10:06:07 Asunto: Re: Points and bonuses Thad: I don;'t follow you. What should be minimum of zero? 11. Enero 2005, 09:48:10 Asunto: Points and bonuses There was an idea to have an option to set the starting points and the bonus value during the pond definition.
Anyway, it should be assured that no future pond game becomes unbalanced because of badly chosen parameters (e.g. starting with 50 points and bonus 5000). That's why this proposal has been created: x = starting points (multiple of 40) x/40 = bonus The current parameters (20000, 500) follow this rule as well. 11. Enero 2005, 09:30:36 Asunto: Re: Antiponds - new idea Mely: Sounds interesting :-) 8. Enero 2005, 15:50:58 The main reason was the BKR and history regeneration. 8. Enero 2005, 13:24:26 Asunto: Re: I cant remember.. Stevie: Yes but there is nothing to rate until at least one pond is finished. 7. Enero 2005, 17:09:45 Asunto: Re: history Mely: Yes. It is planned. 7. Enero 2005, 13:02:57 Asunto: Re: Vikings: The red number next to the Main page link informs you about it. 7. Enero 2005, 13:00:13 Asunto: Re: wooaah! Vikings: Now it's like for Tournaments link, the number shows how many ponds in sign-up status are listed on that page. 6. Enero 2005, 13:10:26 Anyway, it's interesting that even though almost everybody complained about the long runs caused by too many players, there are 6 new ponds with unlimited number of participants :-) 6. Enero 2005, 13:00:18 Wait. There was a small bug in the generator. I used resultCode1 instead of resultCode3. Funny, eh? :-D 6. Enero 2005, 06:59:55 Asunto: Re: furbster: Sorry, I forgot. Doing it now :-) 5. Enero 2005, 19:19:43 Asunto: Re: Fencer Czuch Chuckers: Bad Bishop (and many other Czech players) played this game for several years and I simply trust him that the rules are balanced well. 5. Enero 2005, 13:37:41 Asunto: Re: Fencer Stevie: Bad Bishop already explained why it doesn't matter. 4. Enero 2005, 10:45:03 Modificado por Fencer (4. Enero 2005, 11:05:46) I've resolved the bug with automatic moves. It should be correct in the next round (or the round after the next round). 1. Enero 2005, 09:41:26 Asunto: Re: Bad Bishop: Yes, it can be added later. Not now. 26. Diciembre 2004, 11:11:34 It's just a visual bug, not a glitch in the game. 23. Diciembre 2004, 13:26:21 Asunto: Re: fencer Jason: Yes. After I finish some other things.  22. Diciembre 2004, 13:37:27 Asunto: Re: Thanks Fencer Czuch Chuckers: But it could make problems for people who expect a regular deadline and couldn't make it in time to submit a new move.  21. Diciembre 2004, 14:22:54 Now you can edit your move before the round is finished. Some more statistics will follow soon. 19. Diciembre 2004, 17:41:54 BBW: Yes, this bug has been brought to my attention by Pedro Martinez several hours ago :-) It's already fixed and the next round should be correct. << < 1 2 3 > >> |
Fecha y hora
Amigos conectados
Foros favoritos
Comunidades
Consejo del día
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, todos los derechos reservados. Volver a arriba |