Modificado por Walter Montego (19. Enero 2005, 23:52:57)
Czuch Chuckers: Ain't that the truth?
"So I see", said the blindman as he picked up his hammer and saw.
So we get back to the question of what was the point of all of Ed's talking? And why didn't he just stay quiet about it, fork over $18 for a six month Knight membership under a different handle, win 23 games in a row, and then reveal the secret? Too cheap, or too ingenuous? Or is he up to that right now? I really can't make any sense of it. Maybe you guys can help me out here. Or Ed himself. What gives dude?
In the meantime, it's just a game with a lot of uncertainty and luck in it. Whether or not it is subject to mathematical and game theory analysis is beside the point. So is Backgammon. Why make such a big deal about it Ed? Can't you just play the game and have some fun? Or is your obsession with maintaining your no loss record on this site reaching to picking fights with games that cannot be played perfectly and now you've talked your way into not playing it all because you just can't see that?
Show of hands. All those that are actually playing "Run around the Pond" and not talking about playing it.
(ocultar) Si deseas estar en todo momento al tanto de los últimos mensajes de los tableros de discusión, puedes recibirlos en tu cliente de noticias pinchando con el ratón sobre el logo RSS de la parte derecha superior de cada tablero. (pauloaguia) (mostrar todos los consejos)