 |
|
 BrainKing.comBoard for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future. If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider). World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com Sinulla ei ole oikeutta kirjoittaa tälle alueelle. Tälle alueelle kirjoittamiseen vaadittu minimi jäsenyystaso on Brain-Ratsu. Moodi: Kaikki voivat lähettää viestejä
<< < 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 > >> 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 22:55:28 Thanks.......Do you mean that pounds = lbs so it's also valid that 2.2 lbs = 1 Kg 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 22:51:23 Otsikko: Re: OFF TOPIC but easy to answer......... Muokannut playBunny (15. Heinäkuu 2005, 22:56:33) Chessmaster1000: lbs. That's pounds weight. 2.2 pounds = 1 kg.
Google's quite good for conversions: 1 kg in lbs 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 22:49:28 Otsikko: OFF TOPIC but easy to answer......... Muokannut Chessmaster1000 (15. Heinäkuu 2005, 22:50:13) Sorry for this completely OFF-TOPIC but it's a kind of emergency......
What kind of unit the "lbs" represent? Mass unit, force unit......etc.....? And how many Kilograms (if it's actually a mass unit as i suspect) are 400 lbs? Thanks.......... 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 22:43:32 Otsikko: Re:  nobleheart: OH, sorry, forget I said something...*shrinks back under the table* 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 22:40:37 Otsikko: Re: Pedro Martínez: we are talking about harleys interviews not cheating at this moment. 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 22:39:17 but if its her baby,its up to harley to open it for input. 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 22:38:32 I don't understand the reason for this "voting". If you think somebody's cheating, let Fencer know. Period. Why would BK need some voting? 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 22:38:20 hopefully we are all friendly,democratic. 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 22:37:07 Otsikko: Re:nobleheart: It's Harley's gig. Do you think pawns should vote or be voted for? Just curious. Tuesday: I think the key factor should be who we ALL vote is the most interesting person at the time to be intereviewed.
we should ALL be allowed to be picked. is it not fair? harley,it is your concept? very good idea. 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 22:24:49 Otsikko: Re: Tuesday: Sure... Why not? 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 21:00:14 Otsikko: Re: ScarletRose: maybe an idea for something interesting to do.would be for each member getting to cast a vote on"who should be interveiwsed next". 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 16:45:00 Otsikko: Re: New game with 0 day 1 hour. Jason: You were right! Thank you for your advice.
I have launched a new Janus game with 1 hour for each. I will wait until 17.30h if someone is interested in else I will cancel the challenge. 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 16:22:22 Otsikko: Re: New game with 0 day 1 hour. Jason: Sorry to reply so late. I jumped over your message, sorry. I will say a game during less than 2 hours (1 for each). Probably I didn't click the right boxes? 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 16:19:03 Otsikko: Re:  BIG BAD WOLF: kewlness I didn't know if there was a little poll thingy or not .. 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 16:17:11 Otsikko: Re:  ScarletRose: That is something harley started, and she goes through the trouble of collecting all the questions and such - so I believe she picks who gets interviewed or not.... when she has time and such. 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 16:16:44 Muokannut ScarletRose (15. Heinäkuu 2005, 16:17:13) Sorry Spirou for somewhat barging in on your convo.. I perhaps am ignorant enough to think that several topics can be discussed at one time.. :)
Hope you have a cheery day!  15. Heinäkuu 2005, 16:11:30 Otsikko: Re: ScarletRose: Am I concerned? Not sure due to my so poor english. 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 16:08:34 I've a question.. who determines who is getting interviewed?? And what helps with that choice?? 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 15:33:32 Otsikko: Re: New game with 0 day 1 hour. Muokannut Spirou (15. Heinäkuu 2005, 15:37:39) Fencer: I just create a new game with a time limit 1 hour for the game. In my window I see "Time control: Not used"! I doubt it is exact :-)) 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 15:17:15 Otsikko: Re: New game with 0 day 1 hour. Muokannut Spirou (15. Heinäkuu 2005, 15:17:55) Andre Faria: Yes, a new board for that purpose (oops, Fencer had just recently reduct the number of board!). I think about a board like the "Seeking window in ICC if you know that well know online club where the challenge will be cancelled at will or when we log out BrainKing.
Of course I suppose Fencer wished to know how many persons could be interested in? Well not sure often the offer creates the desire ;-). 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 15:16:54 Otsikko: Re: New game with 0 day 1 hour.  Spirou: if you select Time for move" 0 day 0 hour then i believe that there is no amount of limit at all , could never time out . 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 15:07:45 Otsikko: Re: New game with 0 day 1 hour. Spirou: There could be a board or something where players could agree these games... With no risk of someone lose by timeout... 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 15:05:27 Otsikko: Re: New game with 0 day 1 hour. Andre Faria: Correct! BUT ... how could I know in advance my opponent will agree? ;-) 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 15:04:08 Otsikko: Re: New game with 0 day 1 hour. Spirou: If you agree for a meeting you could agree also with your opponent to complete the game quickly, and the time for game would be useless... 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 15:01:49 Otsikko: New game with 0 day 1 hour. Muokannut Spirou (15. Heinäkuu 2005, 15:04:11) I wish to know what appen if I create a new game with "Time for move" 0 day 0 hour and "Time for game" 0 day and for example 1 hour.
If a kind US (for example) opponent accept my challenge during "my" night, I suppose I lose on time after an hour. If that is right, is it possible to imagine a mechanism to agree for a meeting? I presume I could not be alone wishing sometime to play online. 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 13:38:05 DANG, must Fencer now fear spending the rest of his life in a Czech Republic Jail?
I wonder if he can run BK from his jail cell?   15. Heinäkuu 2005, 02:56:36 maybe we should vote on having fencer delete the profile! lol 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 02:54:26 Otsikko: Re: Nirvana: To remind us that sh edoesn't liek the place  15. Heinäkuu 2005, 02:53:26 Otsikko: Re:  reza: I think if she dislikes the place so much, then why does she keep coming back? 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 02:30:41 Otsikko: Re: Nirvana: I think perhaps Fencer can delet that ID and get rid of it!  15. Heinäkuu 2005, 02:30:19 Otsikko: Re: Rose: I'll hold my tounge. LOL 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 02:29:21 Otsikko: Re: reza: a lot got that message. 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 02:28:56 Otsikko: Re: Pedro Martínez: Who mine? don't get me started. l o l 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 02:27:50 Otsikko: Re: tazman7474: Some folks just aren't happy unless they are stirring up trouble is all.. 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 02:24:42 Otsikko: Re: reza: that's pretty much what i thought too! 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 02:21:36 Otsikko: Re: Funny. I wonder what's that woman's problem. 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 02:21:29 Otsikko: Re: tazman7474: LOL! well, anyone who doesn't want to be a member, can simply not sign in any more!
I don't know what's so complicated about this. 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 02:19:32 Otsikko: Re: reza: i got that too! sounds like someone trying to stir a pot to me! 15. Heinäkuu 2005, 02:17:58 What's this that I got right now?
Anyone wishing to register a complaint about BrainKing.com's lack of a 'Delete Feature' for your account, can easily do so here: Czech Republic Office For Personal Data Protection Visit this website: http://www.uoou.cz/eng/101_2000.php3 Or directly send an e-mail to: info@uoou.cz 14. Heinäkuu 2005, 12:27:16 Otsikko: Re: HI TO ALL  damamaster: Since Turkish Checkers is not the only game in the world, you should have added you were talking about this game. And I already said many times I'd fix this small bug when I have time for it. 14. Heinäkuu 2005, 10:40:28 Otsikko: HI TO ALL on Brainking when the stone had taken there is rule mistake still .ı wrote to Fencer to correct this mistake but he didint ı dont know why.the mistake is on that the players cant prefer less stones if there the much ı meant the players coludnt take 2 stones if there available present 3 or much 11. Heinäkuu 2005, 23:27:14 Otsikko: Re: How can I delete some games in my tournament? Fencer: Thanks. I hope it comes as improved in shortest time. 11. Heinäkuu 2005, 15:52:46 Otsikko: Re: How can I delete some games in my tournament? TC: The checkboxes were added a long time after the tournaments had been introduced, it's just a mix of several features. But it can be improved, of course. 11. Heinäkuu 2005, 15:45:16 Otsikko: Re: How can I delete some games in my tournament? Hrqls: Yes you are right. At the top of tournament page I have seen it. But I think its purpose only for one game type. In principal, to check the games over one, not so practical and using checking boxes are more preferrable! 11. Heinäkuu 2005, 14:33:15 Otsikko: Re: How can I delete some games in my tournament? TC: true .. i had the same problem some times as well .. i think it is caused by the drop down box at the top of the page .. but i am not sure ..
when someone with a bit more knowledge than me doesnt respond you could post this on the feature request board as well or on the bug tracker 11. Heinäkuu 2005, 14:27:57 Otsikko: Re: How can I delete some games in my tournament? Hrqls: Thanks for your advice. But, I would be happy if programm gives a way like this modify needs. When I begin to create my tournament, I checked under the page only backgammon types, but created tournament has all game types! << < 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 > >> |
Päivämäärä ja aika
Ystävät palvelimella
Suosikki keskustelut
Yhteisöt
Päivän vinkki
|
|
Tekijänoikeudet - Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, kaikki oikeudet pidätetään. Takaisin alkuun |