Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.
If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).
Lista keskustelualueista
Sinulla ei ole oikeutta kirjoittaa tälle alueelle. Tälle alueelle kirjoittamiseen vaadittu minimi jäsenyystaso on Brain-Ratsu.
Eddie I hope you won't keep it to yourself..ignore the negative ones. Like you said....you accomplished something in what you enjoy doing! Way to go! : ))))
perhaps you have tried to do your move a 2nd time
after not being sure that it was submitted properly ?
in such a case I too noticed that the played stone
of sudden seemed to change its colour ... but that
'fata morgana' has always vanished next move, for me ... ~*~
I just made a move against Brain08. When I( went to look at it, two strange things happened:
1) Rather than my white stone being there, his black stone was (in K-P) and
2) There was a red sentence saying the game had been suspended.
What is going on here?
Make the pawn a free trial membership for 6 months, those who are really interested will pay for an upgrade to a higher level. Delete all others after that 6 months. I know some will make a new account but with the actuel "pawnship" it is a lifetime free membership! The membership fee for the levels is up to Fencer and Liquid. They have to see it as a kind of business, value for money will make it a success. Asking to much the players will leave, asking for just a pittance BK can not survive by a shortage of money
Well the only reason I really have over 400 games is because I have been unable to play all my games like I use to - or it would be around 200 games - which is a good number for me. And actually I think there should be a limit for rooks - but it should be around 400-500 games - way more then *most* will even get too.
If I were to do things, I would probable make 2 different "pawn" accounts and leave everything else the same.
Free Pawn: 5-10 non-tournament games, 1 tournament at a time (which at most would be 7 additional tournament games) - total 17 possible games at a time, and possible a high move limit like 50 moves per day - way more to play many of their games, but still a limit to make sure they don't use too much of the system.
Super Pawn: A smaller fee - say $6 for 6 months, or $10 for year. 20 non-tournament games, and 1 tournament (with max 7 more tournament games) - for a total of 27 games possible. Very high more limit - like 100 moves per day - again, way above what most pawns use, but will stop the few that may take too much from the server. Also maybe let them enter 1 Fellowship as a guest where they can view/post in their message board, join tournament, but NOT join a fellowship team.
BBW: My membership for the next half year is Brainknight indeed, but look the number of my games 10,12 or 15 (possible are 50). But you have over 400...
Unlimited offers are always bad.Today one player has 200 games next day 400 games and next week with his brother,his friend his neighbour 800 or 1000 games all on the same account.
That is impossible and cannot go !
And to the argument the price is already to high: I know there are everywhere people who want all for free,the best service and the best technic! This is impossible!
But for Brainking counts the maxim too: It must be nice a n d economical,or it will disappear!
To the Brainpawns:Okay they could delete their accounts and make a new,okay they can economize 6 Dollar in the year but they lose their ratings and other.
Okay if they want to economize,they should economize. I think the greater number of pawns would pay this little amount.
If only the half of the pawns pay the small amount then you have in one year the money for a better server.
CaissasDream: I like that the only thing you don't propose to change is the membership that you have! Just find that kind of funny!
Anyway, to limit pawns to a year a free membership might get a few user to pay something so they don't lose their stats, but a majority of the pawns you just delted their account and create a new account. That in my opinoin would cause more of a pain to everyone involved, it would not be worth it. (System having to register new account, other users having to figure out what their new friends name is, etc...)
And as was pointed out about rooks with many games - they can only play so many games per hour - so if they have 500 games going or 150 games going - they are still only going to play XX games per hour. And depending on what opponents are on-line, they can easly still make the same number of moves and using the same amount of the "system", that it really would not matter. (Take up a little more disk space holding the game, but I'm pretty sure that with how cheap disk space is, that is NOT the problem with the current server).
lullobear: These new options that are added do not slow the server down. Fencer has many ideas of things to do for the server THAT WILL slow the server down, and he is holding back on doing any of those until the server issue is fixed.
Otsikko: I don't agree... (maybe I am just a doubting thomas?)
Adding more options doesn't mean worse performance. Adding the ability to have a game unrated doesn't hurt anything... when the game is created, the only thing that would be different is the fact that a flag is set as unrated vs rated. Adding extra options on the games page so that you can "make move and go to certain page" doesn't affect performance, in fact, it should help, since you can get to pages faster without going through more clicks, which means more database queries and more pages to show.
Fencer has added new option to the site a few days ago and is still working on other options. I don't know much about computers but as far as i know every new option costs space and server time on this overloaded server. As i see it: more options (nice) but less access to the site (not so nice). Can somebody convince me that i am wrong?
Otsikko: the price for rook membership is already too high
I strongly disrecommend lacking respect for
non-american loan levels - this is not iyt ... ~*~
PS it's the common, invalid milk-maiden calculation
to assume raising prices means higher income ...
one of the main reasons why CD- and software
companies have problems since years ...
impudent attitude leads to sharing and cheating.
e.g. I simply refuse to pay 50$ for a computer game
- I get it from a friend when he's done. if the price would
be 25$ - four times the sales minimum would be acchieved.
equals double income. sounds odd ? think. ~*~
i am one of the players with over 200 games, just because i have that anount of games does not mean i play them all at once, different players are on at different times of the day, i may have 20 going at one time (if the player's are on line!)
other times, only 2 or 3 players are on line at any one time, so the amount of games cannot make any difference to the server as far as i can work out!
i would be quite happy to pay a higher price for my membership. i have made a donation to help towards this, i have also bought my daughter a membership. but she hardly plays, but the money was sent just the same.. so in my way, i have paid a higher cost for the amount of games i play!
and quite happy about it :)
Otsikko: Re: Money for a new server, player with many games
I do not favor limiting either the advantages or the number of games Rooks can initiate, but I do strongly believe the price for a Rook membership should increase. For what they receive, a more reasonable price would be $45 or $50 per annum.
I have my own complex set of reasons for purchasing a Knight membership, but admit the Rook is by far a much more attractive deal. Why is it that, of the paying members, there are roughly twice as many Rooks as Knights? It is simple really. The benefits for Rooks are a lot greater than those of Knights for only a marginally steeper cost. Current contracts must be obliged, of course, but at some future point a price increase for Rooks should be worked in.
Putting limitations on Pawns is meaningless. It sounds good in theory, but any user can get around it by simply creating another account.
of course it makes no difference altogether,
whether one moves for a few hours in 100 games
or in 500 games - he has always only one of them loaded PERIOD ~*~
I don't agree with the Brainrook aspect. I see no reason to limit games in that way. What kind of performance issues are we talking about if somebody is playing 300 games at the same time? I can't imagine it is a lot... disk space might be the biggest impact...
I personally think Brainrooks should have unlimited games.
Otsikko: Money for a new server, player with many games
It cannot be that there are 6000 user the most play free and pay nothing and some other "Brainrooks" are paying their amount and some of them play so many games 200-400 so that the server is collapsing!
For a player with 200-400 games the brainrook amount is to less!
It cannot be that there is no money for a better server, no money for the programmer who works hard for a nice site and earns nothing for his work!
But he has to make a reset every one or two hours round about the clock because we all can play and play and play....!
And the best is all are crazy and happy if there are players with hundreds or thousands of games!
Have you all considered that fencer at one day says "Good bye",finishs Brainking and then our nice site is away forever!
That`s why I suggest to reform the structure of the membership:
1.Brainpawn: As before but only free for one year!
2.Brainpawn: After one year he pays 6 Dollars in the year, that is really not much!
3.Brainknight: As before
4.Brainrook: As before , but limitation 150 Games
That is a lot of games but if somebody wants to play more games he should buy a second account!
Let us all play 2000 games,and all play 385 games simultaneously!
Perhaps is it good for the overburdens server?
If Eddie can increase the number of synchronous games to 500?
Fencer is sure very glad!
Who has the record?
Congratulations Eddie. I agree with all you wrote. I would say alot of us come here to relax, have fun & play games. You pay & play, great to have members like you :)
(p.s. Wots a win ???)
I am happy to see you got 2000 wins and I am sure it will be 3000 real soon!! All the players here should be happy for you!! But then I only saw 1 that isn't.. that is his/her problem :)
Way to go Eddie.. Don't pay any mind to anyone who says anything negative. At least you arent doing anything illegal online like some ppl do. You are enjoying your self and thats all that matters. I feel sorry for people who dont have anything else to do with their lives but worry about what other people are doing!
feel sorry for someone that likes to play games as a hobby?...thats all this is to me..say whats ya want to whomever ya want it doesnt bother me..i play for fun to relax after long stressful days at my job...if i was or am slowing the site down by playinf so many games all fencer has to do is say so but like everyone else i payed to play here and i feel im getting as much as i can for the money i spent..i hardly believe the games and moves i make slow this site down...this site has lots of content and graphics that fencer has worked hard for us to put in no other site lets us make unlimited tourneys etc...i love this site do to all of its options and its growing and expanding...unfortunetly this site is getting alot of complainers etc that the other sites have had i try hard to stay out of it because it does no good to whine all the time when i can be playing my evenings away relaxing.well whatever i already said more than i wanted to...this site is great...and i will continue to play as much as i can here...thats just one of the things that sites like this are made for in the first place...to play games...dont feel sorry for me uil... of all the things in this world i could be doin...playing and spending my time here is my choice and i enjoy it...see yas in the games...sorry i mentioned i won so many games..i wasnt trying get this kind of attension.. was just for a moment happy i accomplished something in what i enjoy doin...ill keep it to myself from now on....
Gubbe, try to remember my messages as I wrote them. I NEVER promised a new server, i promised to contact some people about it (what i did), but i doubt i can find sponsors to create addicts. Chief KM: I never said I don't like Eddy, I feel sorry for him
At least he is slowing it down doing what was intended for this site, playing games and having fun instead of continual moaning, groaning and complaining. Have a wonderful day all ☺
no Gubbe, but he has played here about 4000 games in that time (385 right now) and playing on some other site: we call that an addict! What do you want, give him an award for slowing down the site the most of all
(piilota) Pelaa peliä reaaliajassa vastustajan kanssa! Se on mahdollista, kun sinä ja vastustajasi valitsette "Pysy tässä" -asetuksen pysyväksi ja käytätte F5-näppäintä sivun uudelleen lataamiseksi! (TeamBundy) (näytä kaikki vinkit)