 |
|
 Feature requestsDo you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board! If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board. For further information about Feature Requests, please visit this link on the Brainking.Info site : http://brainking.info/archives/20-About-feature-requests.html Sinulla ei ole oikeutta kirjoittaa tälle alueelle. Tälle alueelle kirjoittamiseen vaadittu minimi jäsenyystaso on Brain-Ratsu. Moodi: Kaikki voivat lähettää viestejä
<< < 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 > >> 10. Syyskuu 2004, 22:50:54 More important things like autopass type feature for my battleboats variation game idea. 10. Syyskuu 2004, 22:46:58 Fencer said on 26th August that a doubling cube is on the TO DO list but there are more important things he has to do first. 10. Syyskuu 2004, 22:46:54 grenv: Actually, if the code is acting as intended, that is the exact definition of bug free code! Like Fencer said, just because it allows you to perform a move against the official rules of backgammon doesn't make it a bug - it makes it a missing or unimplemented feature or rule. 10. Syyskuu 2004, 22:37:15 Would also need to double the points for a gammon and triple for a backgammon. 10. Syyskuu 2004, 22:36:50 i indeed concur.
You could also implement in single games: Winning a doubled game could count as winning 2 games in the ratings. 10. Syyskuu 2004, 22:15:53 Otsikko: Re: Request for backgammon. You could use that cube in all backgammon variations. I am sure most backgammon enthusists would concer backgammon matches without a double cube is not really backgammon at all. 10. Syyskuu 2004, 22:12:57 Otsikko: Re: Request for backgammon. Agreed. It would add a bit more depth to Crowded Backgammon as well. 10. Syyskuu 2004, 22:10:19 Otsikko: Re: Request for backgammon. I think a doubling cube which has been asked about in the past would be a great addition to multiple game matches. Obviously in single game matches it makes no sense. I would be more inclined to play multiple game matches if the doubling cube was put into play here at brainking. It adds more strategy to backgammon matches as well. 10. Syyskuu 2004, 22:03:10 Otsikko: Request for backgammon. First off, this is a great site, as me being on just about every day will show.
I do, however think the backgammon variations could be improved by the addition of the doubling cube. Any thoughts? 10. Syyskuu 2004, 20:30:57 I respectfully disagree.
If the queen was able to move only like a king, would that be a bug or a missing feature? Just because the code is behaving as the engineer meant it to doesn't mean there is no bug!! 10. Syyskuu 2004, 20:11:52  It's not a bug. Only a missing feature. 10. Syyskuu 2004, 20:03:35 Please fix the bug where you are not forced to use the higher die in backgammon if both can't be used.
Also could you add it to the "Known bugs" tab? thanks 9. Syyskuu 2004, 02:58:12 Muokannut Vikings (9. Syyskuu 2004, 02:58:42) It's probably been brought up before, but, would it be possible to mark the pieces that have been knocked off to the bar differently than the ones that haven't been moved yet in crowded backgammon and gammon race? With multiple games it's hard to keep track of forced moves the other player may or may not have. 8. Syyskuu 2004, 09:53:09 Its been like it since BK2 came out and has been brought up many times, sorry LJ you are slow once again ;oÞ 8. Syyskuu 2004, 06:52:03 actually I kinda think it is cute and if left, it can sorta be classified a "feature"
I like it anyways, just thought I would let others know :) 8. Syyskuu 2004, 06:50:09 Then you should write it to Bug Tracker, it's not a feature request.
Anyway, it's a small detail :-) 8. Syyskuu 2004, 03:31:01 Otsikko: Great Feature dont you just love it how when someone is writing a message it says "browsing waiting games"
LOL I think it is a bug Fencer 6. Syyskuu 2004, 20:44:13 I agree with BuilderQ. If you need time off use a vacation day, there are plenty of them for this purpose. For many people a day off may be a day more likely to be spent playing games ;) 6. Syyskuu 2004, 20:35:03 Otsikko: beecue read the brainking.com board, please - there's a root that I made tree here ... 0:) ~*~ 6. Syyskuu 2004, 20:34:29  Exactly, BuilderQ. That is how it should be fairly handled. 6. Syyskuu 2004, 20:33:06 Why can't players just choose their own holidays by assigning vacation days? 6. Syyskuu 2004, 20:32:58 Otsikko: easter, resp. passah Muokannut danoschek (6. Syyskuu 2004, 20:33:34) is more important for the majority of abrahamians. ~*~ 6. Syyskuu 2004, 20:30:18 It seems to me that if every holiday, of every possible culture were to be "days off", then there wouldn't be many days that AREN'T holidays.
I believe other sites have stopped doing holidays, for this reason. I think the only holiday that really impacts most cultures, is Christmas. 6. Syyskuu 2004, 20:17:14 is the purpose to not count said holidays against game time? 6. Syyskuu 2004, 20:09:49 Otsikko: full featured calendar with all national holidays Muokannut danoschek (6. Syyskuu 2004, 20:10:34) I heard single citizens of the world's second-largest economy
feel neglected. Brainking would be the first gameserver with a complete holiday database, hence patent-worthy. ~*~ 0:) 6. Syyskuu 2004, 17:42:37 Otsikko: interesting Muokannut danoschek (6. Syyskuu 2004, 17:45:28) how many people without own life are busy pondering 24/7.
yet another reason making the boards a misfeature too often. ~*~ 6. Syyskuu 2004, 17:10:25 Does he even know? LOL 6. Syyskuu 2004, 17:05:07 What the heck is he talking about? 6. Syyskuu 2004, 16:05:27 Otsikko: Re: Prizes Muokannut SMART ALX (6. Syyskuu 2004, 16:07:37) Prize tourny's dont give you s#@$ unless you win thats why i'm enjoying are victory HA HA,Did you lose your captain...lmao 6. Syyskuu 2004, 16:03:10 I agree Stardust. I took it the same way myfanwy did - but a :-) would have confirmed it. 6. Syyskuu 2004, 15:59:53 Valid point myfanwy but as stated by Medic,without the use of bodylanguage how can one know for sure in which context something is to be taken?
By the use of little letters like 'lol' perhaps, or :-) :-) 6. Syyskuu 2004, 09:54:34 I must have missed something because I thought Fencer's post was humourous.
"Please be patient as I have to be with you and your *you know what*." The way I read it is that the *you know what* is refering to autopass...and, as everyone that reads this board knows, autopass is the 'dreaded word that shouldn't be mentioned'. And of course, I've just mentioned it! C'est la vie. 6. Syyskuu 2004, 05:40:04 Otsikko: I was not intended to trigger a debate or to widen it innecessarily - just a reminder that this is
feature request - not a 'you know what'-flameup panhandle ... obviously not a non-czech board-edge as alleged once oupon the time ... ~*~ 6. Syyskuu 2004, 05:35:40 I didnt think it was meant that way personally. Its one of those things that you dont have the advantage of body language and voice inflection to give the mood of the sentence. 6. Syyskuu 2004, 02:31:04 Otsikko: no the point is that anybody should be granted Muokannut danoschek (6. Syyskuu 2004, 02:34:23) to request a feature without being attacked personally - fencer did not 'just ask for
patience', he talked back in a haughty way using an uncalled personal snide, a bad example and highly unprofessional especially after becrying board style bitterly before ... ~*~ 6. Syyskuu 2004, 02:14:41  I think the point is that anyone has a right to their opinion, and can state such opinion (as long as within the rules of the site), but that does not mean the Fencer or anyone else will share that opinion, no matter how much you support the site. (if that is where you are trying to go with it.) 6. Syyskuu 2004, 02:12:57 I think you have missed the point 6. Syyskuu 2004, 01:57:35  Nobody said you cannot state your opinion, Fencer only asked for patience. Is that so wrong? 6. Syyskuu 2004, 01:51:19 One other point I would like to make on the subject and that is I have two prize tourneys running at the moment with three years of rook membership up for grabs. I feel that does give me the right to state my opinion. 6. Syyskuu 2004, 01:49:35 Otsikko: *announcement*  Public Relations Skills 101 Scheduled for this coming Tuesday at 7pm.
All those interested meet me in the Lounge @ 10 til.. and those that really need to learn it.. be there at 6:30.. so we can warm ya up!! 5. Syyskuu 2004, 21:13:12 Otsikko: Re: It's certainly not you who should apologize, Doc Agreed Dano! I believe Fencer owes an apology. 5. Syyskuu 2004, 20:54:53 Otsikko: It's certainly not you who should apologize, Doc Slowly I quit wondering why misuse of public
boards seems customary and even encouraged here ... ~*~ 5. Syyskuu 2004, 17:04:50 Otsikko: Re:  In days of yore the KM "Proper Checker Pieces Task Force" nagged him incessantly and it went over like a pregnant pole vaulter. Live and learn. LOL 5. Syyskuu 2004, 16:59:23 why is that??? What is the big deal??? 5. Syyskuu 2004, 16:58:17 Requests for proper checker pieces have historically inflamed Fencer. 5. Syyskuu 2004, 16:50:15 Yea your right Stevie... I am not the one who should apologise. :o) << < 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 > >> |
Päivämäärä ja aika
Ystävät palvelimella
Suosikki keskustelut
Yhteisöt
Päivän vinkki
|
|
Tekijänoikeudet - Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, kaikki oikeudet pidätetään. Takaisin alkuun |